UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

 

 

Filed by the Registrant  x                              Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ¨

Filed by the Registrant  ☒            Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

xDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨Definitive Additional Materials

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

The TJX Companies, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

xNo fee required.Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨No fee required
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

5)

Total fee paid:

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

3)

Filing Party:

 

4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 


LOGO

LOGO

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

April 24, 201526, 2018

Dear Fellow Stockholder:Shareholder:

We cordially invite you to attend our 20152018 Annual Meeting on Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 2015,5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. (local time), to be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts. Please enter through the Northeast Entrance.Hilton Garden Inn Montreal Centre-Ville, 380 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0B1, Canada.

The proxy statement accompanying this letter describes the business we will consider at the meeting. Please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internetonline and telephone voting are attached to your proxy card. If you prefer, you can vote by mail by completing and signing your proxy card and returning it in the enclosedpre-paid return envelope.

We hope that you will be able to join us on June 11th.5th. Thank you for your support of TJX.

Sincerely,

 

 

Sincerely,LOGO

LOGO

LOGO
Bernard CammarataCarol Meyrowitz

Executive Chairman of the Board

  

LOGO

Ernie Herrman

Chief Executive Officer and President

 

Printed on Recycled Paper


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Introduction

1

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors

2

Corporate Governance

5

Beneficial Ownership

14

Executive Compensation

16

Director Compensation

45

Proposal 2 – Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

48

Proposal 3 – Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation

48

Equity Compensation Plan Information

49

Voting Requirements and Proxies

49

Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations

50

Other Matters

50

Directions to the TJX Annual Meeting

51


The TJX Companies, Inc.

NOTICE OF

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSSHAREHOLDERS

June 11, 2015

5, 2018

The 2018 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. will be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusettsthe Hilton Garden Inn Montreal Centre-Ville, 380 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0B1, Canada, on Thursday,Tuesday, June 11, 2015,5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. (local time) to vote on:

 

Election of the directors named in this proxy statement

 

Ratification of appointment of ourPricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 20162019

 

Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the “say-on-pay vote”)say-on-pay vote)

Shareholder proposal for a report on compensation disparities based on race, gender, or ethnicity

Shareholder proposal for amending TJX’s clawback policy

Shareholder proposal for a supply chain policy on prison labor

 

Any other business properly brought before the meeting

StockholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on April 14, 20159, 2018 are entitled to notice of, and entitled to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.of that meeting.

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrateshow that you were a TJX stockholdershareholder at the close of business on April 14, 20159, 2018 or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a stockholder.shareholder. If you are not a stockholdershareholder of record but hold shares through a bank, broker, trustee or nominee,other third party, you will need to bring proof of your beneficial ownership as of April 14, 2015,9, 2018, such as a brokerage account statement showing your ownership on that date or similar evidence of ownership. All stockholdersshareholders will need to check in upon arrival and receive attendee badges for security purposes. Please allow additional time for these procedures.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Ann McCauleyAlicia C. Kelly

Secretary

Framingham, Massachusetts

April 24, 201526, 2018

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

PLEASE VOTE OVERONE OF THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL.FOLLOWING WAYS:

BY MAILONLINEBY PHONEIN PERSON

Sign and Return Proxy Card

Follow instructions provided in proxy materials

at: www.envisionreports.com/TJX

Follow instructions provided in proxy materials

call: 1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

Follow instructions provided in proxy materials

Attend Annual Meeting

Complete and sign ballot to

cast your vote at meeting



LOGO

PROXY OVERVIEW

FISCAL 2018 BUSINESS REVIEW

Financial Results/

Business Execution

Shareholder 
Value Creation
Business/Strategic
Results

•  Over $35 billion net sales, an increase of 8% over fiscal 2017

•  Comparable store sales1 increased 2% over a strong 5% in fiscal 2017

•  Surpassed $5 billion in net sales at HomeGoods, our U.S. home division

•  7.4% total shareholder return

•  Returned $2.4 billion to shareholders through our share repurchase and dividend programs

•  Increased dividend by 20% during fiscal 2018; announced plan to increase an additional 25% in fiscal 2019

•  $49.3 billion market cap at fiscalyear-end

•  Opened our 4,000th store, with 4,070 total stores at fiscal year-end

•  More than 250 stores opened during fiscal 2018

•  Launched a second home store concept in the U.S., Homesense

1Comparable store sales are defined in Appendix A.

During fiscal 2018, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX, the company, or we) solidly executed our business plan and growth strategies, increasing comparable store sales, driven by customer traffic, and growing our store base globally while maintaining focus on driving profitable sales, reinvesting in the business, managing expenses, and returning value to shareholders. At the beginning of fiscal 2019, we announced plans to continue our growth and reinvestment initiatives, including driving comparable store sales and customer traffic gains, increasing our long-term store growth potential for some of our chains, and, in light of U.S. tax law changes, planning a more substantial share buyback program and increase in our quarterly dividends and additional investments in our Associates and our communities. Fiscal 2018 was a 53-week year; fiscal 2017 was a 52-week year.

FISCAL 2018 SHAREHOLDER OUTREACH AND GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Program Outreach. During fiscal 2018, in response to our most recentsay-on-pay vote, the Executive Compensation Committee of our Board led an extensive outreach initiative focused on our executive compensation program to better understand the concerns and perspectives of our broad shareholder base. The resulting changes we made to our fiscal 2019 executive compensation program are presented in our Compensation Discussion & Analysis section (CD&A) along with the discussion of our fiscal 2018 program and results.

Governance Update: Proxy Access. In February 2018, we amended our by-laws to implement proxy access to provide that one or more shareholders (up to 20, collectively), owning at least 3% of TJX’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate for election to the Board and include in TJX’s proxy materials up to the greater of two individuals or 20% of the Board, subject to the provisions in our by-laws. We also continued to discuss and engage on issues of interest to our shareholders throughout the year.

2018 Proxy Statement    1


LOGO

VOTING ITEMS FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERSSHAREHOLDERS

June 11, 2015

PROXY STATEMENT

INTRODUCTION

Why am I receiving this proxy statement?The Board of Directors of The TJX Companies, Inc., (TJX or the company) is sending this proxy statement to you as a shareholder of TJX, is solicitingto solicit your proxy for the 20152018 Annual Meeting to be held on June 11, 2015,5, 2018 to vote on the following items:

 

Election of the directors (Proposal 1) – see page 2named in this proxy statement (see p. 15)

Ratification of appointment of ourPricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016 (Proposal 2) – see page 482019 (see p. 61)
Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the “say-on-pay vote”) (Proposal 3) – see page 48, and also theExecutive Compensationsection, starting on page 16

Any other businessAdvisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (thesay-on-pay vote) (see p. 61)

Three shareholder proposals, if properly brought before the meetingpresented (see proposals starting on p. 62)

Who can vote at the meeting?Stockholders of record

HOW TO VOTE YOUR SHARES

If you owned TJX common stock at the close of business on April 14, 20159, 2018, the record date for our 2018 Annual Meeting, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 682,260,150626,927,947 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

How do I vote?There are multiple ways to vote your shares.

 

If you are a stockholdershareholder of record (meaning you may vote by signing and returninghold TJX shares registered in your name), please follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card by mail or by using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card and other enclosures to indicate how you would like to vote. You may vote over the Internetonline or by telephone, using the toll-free telephone number provided. You may also vote in person at the meeting.

If you are a “street name” holder, meaning you own through a third party like a bankprovided, or broker, please refer to the enclosures provided by that third party with this proxy statement to see how to provide voting instructions for your shares (which may include Internet or telephone voting).

If you hold shares in the TJX stock fund available through the TJX General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan, our U.S. 401(k) plan, or the TJX General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (P.R.), our Puerto Rico savings plan, you may vote your plan sharessign and return the proxy card by submitting voting directions by following the instructions on the voting instruction card provided with this proxy statement. In order to allow sufficient time for the plan shares to be voted by the plan trustee in accordance with your instructions, your voting instructions must be received no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on Sunday, June 7, 2015. If you do not timely submit voting instructions, your plan shares will not be voted.

Please note that the process for Internet and telephone voting is intended to authenticate your identity and permit you to confirm that your voting instructions are accurately reflected. Please seeVoting Requirements and Proxies on page 49 for further information about voting.

Can Imail. You can change or revoke my proxy?Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meetingmeeting by voting later online or by Internet or telephone, returning a later-dated proxy card by mail, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of TJX at our corporate offices at 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

If you are aWhat constitutesstreet name holder(meaning you own TJX shares through a quorumbank, broker, or other third party), please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card you received with this proxy statement to have your shares voted and, if needed, to change or revoke your selections (or contact your bank, broker, or other third party holder for the meeting?A majorityinstructions). You also should have a choice of the shares outstanding and entitledmethods to vote your shares and to change or revoke your voting instructions before the meeting.

With proper documentation, you may also vote in person at the meeting is requiredmeeting. Please see Voting Requirements and Practices on p. 69 for a quorum for the meeting.more information.

This proxy statement, the proxy card, and the Annual Report to StockholdersShareholders for our fiscal year ended January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 (fiscal 2015)2018) are being first mailed to stockholdersshareholders on or about the date of the notice of meeting, April 24, 2015.26, 2018.

OTHER INFORMATION

Please note below other topics included in this proxy statement that may be of interest. This list does not cover all information included in this proxy statement that you should consider. You should review the entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares.

•   Board Responsibilities (see p. 3)

•   Compensation Discussion and Analysis (see p. 21)

•   Board Service at TJX (see p. 5)

•   Corporate Responsibility (see p. 12)

•   Board Committees and Meetings (see p. 8)

•   Communicating with Our Board (see p. 12)

•   Nominees and Their Qualifications (see p. 15)

•   Voting Requirements and Practices (see p. 69)

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON JUNE 11, 2015:5, 2018: THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT ANDFORM 10-K FOR FISCAL 20152018 ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.ENVISIONREPORTS.COM/TJX

2    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Integrity has always been a core tenet of TJX. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in compliance with all laws and regulations that relate to our businesses. Our core Board practices and policies are reflected in our Corporate Governance Principles and Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our Board also maintains written charters for each of our Board committees, discussed further below.

BOARD RESPONSIBILITIES

Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing the business and affairs of the company, and, as part of this responsibility, for regularly monitoring the effectiveness of management’s implementation of strategy, policies, and decisions. The Board, with management, also believes that the interests of our shareholders are enhanced by responsibly considering the interests of our customers, Associates, suppliers, service providers, and communities where we operate.

During the year, our Board reviews with management our strategies, including our plans to drive profitable sales and increase market share, while reinvesting in the business and managing expenses. The Board also oversees management succession planning and has oversight responsibility for our enterprise risk management, discussed below. In addition, as discussed further below, the Board considers Board succession planning and composition.

RISK OVERSIGHT

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular communications with the full Board. The committees escalate risks to the full Board as they determine to be appropriate. In general terms:

The Board reviews strategic, financial, and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans; any major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects, or reputation (including those related to human capital management, supply chain, and environmental sustainability); significant acquisitions and divestitures; and senior management succession planning. The Board receives regular reports from our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer.

The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, compliance with orders, data security, and cybersecurity, and helps oversee management’s processes to identify the material risks that we face as a company, including through our enterprise risk management program. The Audit Committee receives regular reports from our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer.

The Corporate Governance Committeereviews risks related to Board and CEO evaluations, management succession, and Board composition.

The Executive Compensation Committee (ECC) reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of our compensation programs, plans, and arrangements.

The Finance Committeereviews risks related to financing plans, investment policies, capital structure and liquidity; tax strategies; foreign currency exchange and commodity hedging policies; insurance programs; and investment performance, asset allocation strategies, and funding of our pension and retirement benefit plans.

2018 Proxy Statement    3


LOGO

LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Board has separated the role of CEO and Chairman. Carol Meyrowitz has served as Chairman of the Board since June 2016 and as Executive Chairman since the beginning of fiscal 2017 when Ernie Herrman succeeded her as Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Meyrowitz has wide-ranging,in-depth knowledge of our business arising from her many years of service to TJX. As Executive Chairman, she has provided, and is expected to continue to provide, effective leadership to the Board as well as support for management as an active and integral member of the executive team.

As provided in our Corporate Governance Principles, because our current Chairman is not independent, our independent directors have elected an independent Lead Director, John F. O’Brien, to serve as a liaison between the independent directors, the Executive Chairman, and management. As Lead Director, Mr. O’Brien provides independence in TJX’s Board leadership through his review and approval of Board meeting agendas, his participation in management business review meetings, and his leadership of the independent directors. His role is described further below.

The Board believes that the separate roles of Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Lead Director are in the best interests of TJX and its shareholders.

Independent Lead Director Role

•  Meet at least quarterly with our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, and with other senior officers as necessary;

•  Generally attend regular management business review meetings;

•  Schedule meetings of the independent directors;

•  Preside at meetings of the Board in absence of the Executive Chairman, including meetings of the independent directors;

•  Approve Board meeting schedules and agendas;

•  Attend the meetings of each Board committee; and

•  Undertake other responsibilities designated by the independent directors, or as otherwise considered appropriate.

4    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

BOARD SERVICE AT TJX

LOGO

Board Independence

As provided in our Corporate Governance Principles, at leasttwo-thirds of the members of our Board should be independent directors. An independent director is one who the Board has affirmatively determined has no material relationship with TJX (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards in our Corporate Governance Principles that are based on the independence standards required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for its listed companies. As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board considers the Corporate Governance Committee’s independence assessment and recommendation and reviews any transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles (see Transactions with Related Persons, p. 13). To the extent there were any such relationships or transactions, the Board considers whether they are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that 9 directors of our current11-member Board are independent: Zein Abdalla, José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, Jackwyn L. Nemerov, John F. O’Brien, and Willow B. Shire. None of these directors had any relationship with TJX that implicated our categorical standards of independence. Carol Meyrowitz, as Executive Chairman, and Ernie Herrman, as Chief Executive Officer and President, are executive officers of TJX and are therefore not independent.

Board Diversity

As a global company with approximately 249,000 Associates at our fiscal year-end, we consider diversity among our Associates, customers, vendors, and other business associates to be part of who we are and core to our culture. At the Board level and throughout our organization, we strive to promote the benefits of leveraging differences, fostering inclusion, and promoting a talented and diverse workforce. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender, and ethnicity/race and that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experiences, and educational backgrounds to provide sound, expert, and prudent guidance on our operations, strategy, and interests.

The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy that is applied when evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, but takes diversity, including geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity, into account among the many factors it considers. Each individual is evaluated in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that the Committee believes can best continue the success of our business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its collective

2018 Proxy Statement    5


LOGO

diversity of experience. The Committee considers whether candidates have a general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large, global, and complex publicly traded company in today’s business environment; understanding of our business and industry; professional background and leadership experience; experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies; and personal accomplishments.

We value the many kinds of diversity reflected in our Board and nominees.

Board Composition

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Board Assessment

The Board believes it is important to have highly engaged directors and that the Board’s composition be aligned with the changing needs of the company for current and future business environments. We have a regular, comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance and composition of our Board. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the Board as a whole, our Chairman, our independent Lead Director, and each of our individual directors.

Currently, our process, which we review annually through the Corporate Governance Committee, includes both self-assessments and peer review of individual directors and of the Board overall, including an assessment of skills and overall effectiveness, and a consideration of the current and future needs of the Board. In addition, each of our independent committees conducts an annual self-assessment of the committee and the chair, with a process overseen by the Corporate Governance Committee.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals to be director nominees who, in the opinion of the Committee, have high personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values; have demonstrated ability and judgment; and will be committed to collectively serving the long-term best interests of our shareholders. The Corporate Governance Committee considers a range of factors when considering individual candidates. These factors include professional experience, particularly in light of our business and current needs for the Board, independence, and geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity (discussed above). The Committee seeks nominees who have established strong professional reputations with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business, such as:

•   international operations and growth;

•   marketing and brand management;

•   sales, buying, and distribution;

•   accounting, finance, and capital structure;

•   succession planning;

•  strategic planning and leadership of complex
organizations;

•  human resources and talent development
practices;

•  risk oversight;

•  strategy, growth, and innovation.

6    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Finding Candidates. The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by shareholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means that may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as chief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries; considering recommendations from a range of sources, such as the Board of Directors, management or other Associates, shareholders, and industry contacts; and engaging a third-party search firm to expand our search and assist in compiling information about possible candidates.

The Corporate Governance Committee has a policy for shareholder recommendations of candidates for director nominees, which is available on our website. Any shareholder may submit, in writing, one candidate for consideration for each shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate must submit the recommendation by a date not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX:

Office of the Secretary/ Legal Department

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

As described in the policy, a recommendation must provide specified information about, certifications from, and consents and agreements of, the candidate. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by shareholders in the same manner as candidates from other sources. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Majority Voting

Ourby-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles require any incumbent nominee for director to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to the Secretary of TJX at least 14 days in advance of the distribution date for proxy solicitation materials for the shareholder meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. This resignation would be effective only if (a) the director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election and (b) the Board accepts the resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of this kind of resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and its shareholders and will take what it deems to be appropriate action, which may include accepting or rejecting the resignation or taking further measures to address those concerns that were the basis for the underlying shareholder vote.

Board Service Policies

Under our Corporate Governance Principles, directors who are CEOs of public companies should not serve on more than two boards of public companies besides their own, and no director should serve on more than five boards of public companies, including the TJX Board. Under our Audit Committee Charter, members of the Audit Committee should not serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that anon-employee director is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times the annual retainer paid to the director within five years of initial election to the Board. New board members are also expected to acquire at least $10,000 of our common stock outright upon joining the Board. As described further in the CD&A, our executive officers are also subject to stock ownership guidelines. As of April 9, 2018, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with our ownership guidelines.

2018 Proxy Statement    7


LOGO

Board Attendance. During fiscal 2018, our Board met six times. The independent directors also met separately at regularly scheduled executive sessions. It is our policy, included in our Corporate Governance Principles, that all directors standing for reelection are expected to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. All directors who stood for reelection at the 2017 Annual Meeting were in attendance.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS

The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, Finance, and an Executive Committee, each described in more detail below. All members of the Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, and Finance Committees arenon-employee directors and meet the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with NYSE listing standards for that committee. The Executive Committee includes our Executive Chairman who is not independent. While each committee has specific, designated responsibilities, each committee may act on behalf of the entire Board to the extent designated by the respective charter or otherwise by the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and makes recommendations on the composition of our standing committees.

Our committees regularly invite other Board members to join their meetings and, as necessary, otherwise report on their activities to the entire Board. The table below provides information about membership and meetings of these committees during fiscal 2018:

  Name

 

    

Audit

 

    

Corporate

 

Governance

    

Executive

 

Compensation

    

Finance

 

    

Executive

 

  Zein Abdalla

 

         +

 

         +

 

     

  José B. Alvarez1

 

    +

 

         +

 

          

  Alan M. Bennett

 

              *

 

    +

 

     

  David T. Ching

 

    +

 

    +

 

               

  Ernie Herrman

 

                         

  Michael F. Hines

 

    *

 

              +

 

     

  Amy B. Lane

 

    +

 

              *

 

    +

 

  Carol Meyrowitz

 

                        *

 

  Jackwyn L. Nemerov

 

              +

 

          

  John F. O’Brien

 

                        +

 

  Willow B. Shire

 

         *

 

    +

 

          

  Number of meetings during fiscal 2018

 

    12

 

    4

 

    8

 

    4

 

    

 

*Committee Chairman

1Mr. Alvarez is not standing for election at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Mr. Hines, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Mr. Ching; Ms. Lane

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements and oversight of the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and discussing with management, internal auditors, and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;

8    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;

overseeing the audit process, including the annual audit;

overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;

establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters;

selecting, retaining, negotiating, and approving the compensation of, overseeing, and if necessary, replacing, the independent registered public accounting firm;

pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

other matters as the Board considers appropriate.

As part of these responsibilities, in addition to assuring the regular rotation of the lead partner of the independent auditor, as required by law, the Audit Committee, including its Chairman, is involved in the selection of, and reviews and evaluates the performance of, the independent auditor, including the lead audit partner, and further considers whether there should be regular rotation of the audit function among firms. Please see the Audit Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Shire, Chairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Ching

The Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

recommending director nominees to the Board;

developing, recommending to the Board, and reviewing corporate governance principles;

in concert with the Board, reviewing our policies with respect to significant issues of corporate social and public responsibility, including political contributions and activities, environmental and sustainability activities, and charitable giving;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors and the structure and frequency of Board meetings;

reviewing the functions, duties, and composition of the committees of the Board and compensation for Board and committee members;

recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, each individual director, the Chairman, the independent Lead Director, and each committee and its chair;

establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and

overseeing the maintenance and presentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Please see the Corporate Governance Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mr. Bennett, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Ms. Nemerov; Ms. Shire

The ECC’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and approving the structure and philosophy of compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, and senior Associates;

2018 Proxy Statement    9


LOGO

approving the compensation and benefits, including awards of stock options, bonuses, and other awards and incentives, of our executive officers and other Associates in those categories as are from time to time identified by the ECC;

determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including awards of stock options, bonuses, and other awards and incentives, based on the evaluation by the Corporate Governance Committee of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and such other factors as the ECC deems relevant;

determining the performance goals and performance criteria under our incentive plans;

approving the terms of employment of our executive officers, including employment and other agreements with such officers;

overseeing the administration of our incentive plans and other compensatory plans and funding arrangements; and

reviewing and undertaking other matters that the Board or the ECC deems appropriate, such as the review of our succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

Pursuant to its charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and is permitted by applicable law, regulations, and listing standards.

The ECC also reviews our compensation policies and practices for our Associates to determine whether they give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. See Compensation Program Risk Assessment, below.

Please see the ECC charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

FINANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Lane, Chairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Bennett; Mr. Hines

The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our financing plans and strategies; financial condition; capital structure; tax strategies, liabilities, and payments; dividends; stock repurchase programs; and insurance programs;

approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies, commodity hedging policies, capital investment criteria, and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and

reviewing investment policies as well as the performance and actuarial status of our pension and other retirement benefit plans.

Please see the Finance Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Ms. Meyrowitz, Chairman; Ms. Lane; Mr. O’Brien

The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the Board.

10    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

COMPENSATION PROGRAM RISK ASSESSMENT

As part of our regular enterprise risk assessment process overseen by the Board and described above, we review the risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. In fiscal 2018, the ECC reviewed TJX’s Associate compensation policies and practices and determined that they do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The ECC’s assessment considered what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive and broad-based compensation plans and arrangements worldwide; how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated, and managed; and whether those potential risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX.

The assessment was led by our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, whose responsibilities include leadership of our enterprise risk management process, and included consultation with and input from, among others, executive officers, senior human resources and financial executives, the ECC’s independent compensation consultant, and internal and external legal counsel. The assessment considered, among other things, factors intended to mitigate risk at TJX, including:

•  Board and committee oversight;

•  the ECC’s use of an independent compensation consultant;

•  compensation mix, caps on payouts, and emphasis on objective performance-based pay;

•  market checks;

•  Associate communications and training; and

•  company policies, internal controls, and risk management initiatives.

The assessment also considered the balance of potential risks and rewards related to our compensation programs and the role of those programs in implementing our corporate strategy.

CODES OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND OTHER POLICIES

Global Code of Conduct for Associates. We have a Global Code of Conduct for our Associates that sets out our expectations that Associates conduct business with honesty and integrity and treat others with dignity and respect. Our Global Code of Conduct prohibits harassment, discrimination, and retaliation and addresses professional conduct, including employment policies, ethical business dealings, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, intellectual property rights, and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. We have a Code of Conduct helpline to allow Associates to voice their concerns. We also have procedures for Associates to report complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters, which are available on our website, tjx.com.

Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. As noted above, we have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is designed to promote honest and ethical conduct; compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and the avoidance of conflicts of interest for our Board members. We also have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior operating, financial, and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and the Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as required, within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a posting on our website or by filing a Current Report on Form8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

Our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation, and Finance Committees are available on our website, tjx.com, in the Investors section under Governance: Governance Documents. Information appearing on tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

2018 Proxy Statement    11


LOGO

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

For more than 40 years, TJX has been focused on delivering great value to our customers through the combination of brand, fashion, price, and quality. At the same time, we are committed to our corporate responsibility mission of bringing value to our many important stakeholders—our Associates, customers, communities, vendors, and shareholders.

With our long-held principles of respect, honesty, and integrity, central to our efforts, our Corporate Responsibility program has evolved over time and has reflected our ‘smart for business, good for the world’ thinking. We categorize our global corporate responsibility efforts under four strategic pillars:

Our Workplace, which reflects our commitment to our Associates worldwide, including fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment and creating opportunities through training and development. We are committed to creating a workplace where all Associates feel welcomed at the company, valued for their contributions, and fully engaged with our business.

Our Communities, which focuses on our mission to help vulnerable families and children access the resources and opportunities they need to build a better future. Through charitable giving, volunteer efforts, community partnerships, andin-store fundraising, we seek to support organizations that provide basic needs for those in poverty, education and training forat-risk young people, research and care for life-threatening illnesses, and safety from domestic violence.

Environmental Sustainability, which reflects our longstanding commitment to pursue initiatives that are smart for our business and good for the environment. We have continually focused on meaningful initiatives that are aligned with our business goals to help reduce our environmental impact, drive operational cost reductions, and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to environmental sustainability. Key initiatives include increasing energy efficiency, reducing fuel usage, recycling and waste management, and greener building designs. We remain focused on reducing our carbon footprint and are driving towards the achievement of our greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. We are pleased to report we remain on track to meet our 2020 GHG reduction target, established in 2014, and we have begun the process of considering options for our next quantitative emissions reduction goal.

Responsible Business, which reflects our commitment to operating responsibly, sourcing ethically, and ensuring strong corporate governance and compliance. We believe that operating our business responsibly and ethically positions us to address the interests of our stakeholders while also creating long-term value for our shareholders.

We remain focused on continuously enhancing our programs and making a positive, sustainable impact on the world in which we live and conduct our business. To learn more about our evolving efforts, please visit the Responsibility section of our website at tjx.com/responsibility.

COMMUNICATING WITH OUR BOARD

We are interested in hearing from our shareholders and communicate regularly with shareholders throughout the year. Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, thenon-management directors or the independent directors as a group, the Lead Director, or any other specified individual director or directors.

To contact us, address your correspondence to the individual or group you would like to reach and send it to us, c/o Office of the Secretary/Legal Department:

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

The Secretary will forward these communications to the relevant group or individual. Shareholders and others can communicate complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters by writing to the

12    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Audit Committee, c/o Corporate Internal Audit Director, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Under its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which, in addition to TJX, any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers (or their immediate family members), or any greater than 5% shareholders (or their immediate family members) is a participant and has a direct or indirect material interest, as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates, or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside, or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal 2018, asister-in-law of Mr. Sherr and a daughter of Ms. Meyrowitz were employed by TJX. They received compensation from us for fiscal 2018 and the beginning of fiscal 2019 totaling approximately $281,720 and $133,920, respectively, consistent with other Associates at their levels and responsibilities. They also participated in company benefit plans generally available to similarly situated Associates. As described below in Beneficial Ownership, The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that it was the beneficial owner of more than 5% of TJX’s outstanding common stock. TJX expects to pay The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its affiliates approximately $1,885,420 for services primarily provided during fiscal 2018 and the first quarter of fiscal 2019 in connection with TJX’s retirement savings plans (including recordkeeping, trustee, and related services). Our Corporate Governance Committee discussed and approved or ratified these transactions, consistent with our review process described above.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee operates in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the NYSE and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that two of our members (Mr. Hines and Ms. Lane) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

We met 12 times during fiscal 2018, including 4 meetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for fiscal 2018 with management and PwC. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and the potential effects of any disclosed relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors, and PwC TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget, and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and audit results.

We reviewed and discussed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB Auditing Standard 1301, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without

2018 Proxy Statement    13


LOGO

management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019, subject to ratification by TJX’s shareholders.

Audit Committee

Michael F. Hines,Chairman

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane

AUDITOR FEES

The aggregate fees that TJX was billed for professional services rendered by PwC for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were:

  (In thousands)

 

  

2018

 

   

2017

 

 

  Audit

 

  $

 

8,730

 

 

 

  $

 

8,262

 

 

 

  Audit Related

 

   

 

476

 

 

 

   

 

790

 

 

 

  Tax

 

   

 

871

 

 

 

   

 

840

 

 

 

  All Other

 

   

 

66

 

 

 

   

 

55

 

 

 

  Total

 

  $

 

10,143

 

 

 

  $

 

9,947

 

 

 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, review of documents filed with the SEC, review of and opinions on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and, in fiscal 2017, providing a comfort letter in connection with TJX’s issuance of notes.

Audit related fees were for consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit plan and medical claims audits.

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, transfer pricing and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.

All other fees were primarily for services related to our environmental sustainability program.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the company’s retention of PwC. The Audit Committeepre-approves all audit services and all permittednon-audit services by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chairman, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions orcontribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services, or human resource consulting. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates whether TJX’s use of PwC for permittednon-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s provision ofnon-audit services, which were approved in advance, was compatible with their independence.

14    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

PROPOSAL 1 -1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

NomineesBoard Independence

As provided in our Corporate Governance Principles, at leasttwo-thirds of the members of our Board should be independent directors. An independent director is one who the Board has affirmatively determined has no material relationship with TJX (either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company). To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards in our Corporate Governance Principles that are based on the independence standards required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for its listed companies. As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board considers the Corporate Governance Committee’s independence assessment and Their Qualificationsrecommendation and reviews any transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles (see Transactions with Related Persons, p. 13). To the extent there were any such relationships or transactions, the Board considers whether they are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that 9 directors of our current11-member Board are independent: Zein Abdalla, José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, Jackwyn L. Nemerov, John F. O’Brien, and Willow B. Shire. None of these directors had any relationship with TJX that implicated our categorical standards of independence. Carol Meyrowitz, as Executive Chairman, and Ernie Herrman, as Chief Executive Officer and President, are executive officers of TJX and are therefore not independent.

Board Diversity

As a global company with approximately 249,000 Associates at our fiscal year-end, we consider diversity among our Associates, customers, vendors, and other business associates to be part of who we are and core to our culture. At the Board level and throughout our organization, we strive to promote the benefits of leveraging differences, fostering inclusion, and promoting a talented and diverse workforce. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender, and ethnicity/race and that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experiences, and educational backgrounds to provide sound, expert, and prudent guidance on our operations, strategy, and interests.

The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy that is applied when evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, but takes diversity, including geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity, into account among the many factors it considers. Each individual is evaluated in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that the Committee believes can best continue the success of our business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its collective

2018 Proxy Statement    5


LOGO

diversity of experience. The Committee considers whether candidates have a general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large, global, and complex publicly traded company in today’s business environment; understanding of our business and industry; professional background and leadership experience; experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies; and personal accomplishments.

We seekvalue the many kinds of diversity reflected in our Board and nominees.

Board Composition

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Board Assessment

The Board believes it is important to have highly engaged directors and that the Board’s composition be aligned with the changing needs of the company for current and future business environments. We have a regular, comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance and composition of our Board. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the Board as a whole, our Chairman, our independent Lead Director, and each of our individual directors.

Currently, our process, which we review annually through the Corporate Governance Committee, includes both self-assessments and peer review of individual directors and of the Board overall, including an assessment of skills and overall effectiveness, and a consideration of the current and future needs of the Board. In addition, each of our independent committees conducts an annual self-assessment of the committee and the chair, with a process overseen by the Corporate Governance Committee.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals to be director nominees who, in the opinion of the Committee, have high personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values; have demonstrated ability and judgment; and will be committed to collectively serving the long-term best interests of our shareholders. The Corporate Governance Committee considers a range of factors when considering individual candidates. These factors include professional experience, particularly in light of our business and current needs for the Board, independence, and geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity (discussed above). The Committee seeks nominees who have established strong professional reputations sophistication and experience in the retail and consumer industries. We also seek nominees with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business, such as:

•   international operations and growth;

•   marketing and brand management;

•   sales, buying, and distribution;

•   accounting, finance, and capital structure;

•   succession planning;

•  strategic planning and leadership of complex
organizations;

•  human resources and talent development
practices;

•  risk oversight;

•  strategy, growth, and innovation.

6    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Finding Candidates. The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by shareholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means that may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as international operationschief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries; considering recommendations from a range of sources, such as the Board of Directors, management or other Associates, shareholders, and growth; marketingindustry contacts; and brand management; sales, buyingengaging a third-party search firm to expand our search and distribution; accounting, financeassist in compiling information about possible candidates.

The Corporate Governance Committee has a policy for shareholder recommendations of candidates for director nominees, which is available on our website. Any shareholder may submit, in writing, one candidate for consideration for each shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate must submit the recommendation by a date not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX:

Office of the Secretary/ Legal Department

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

As described in the policy, a recommendation must provide specified information about, certifications from, and capital structure; strategic planningconsents and leadershipagreements of, complex organizations; human resourcesthe candidate. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by shareholders in the same manner as candidates from other sources. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and development practices;may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Majority Voting

Ourby-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles require any incumbent nominee for director to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to the Secretary of TJX at least 14 days in advance of the distribution date for proxy solicitation materials for the shareholder meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. This resignation would be effective only if (a) the director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election and strategy, growth(b) the Board accepts the resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of this kind of resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and innovation. Our nominees holdits shareholders and will take what it deems to be appropriate action, which may include accepting or have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizationsrejecting the resignation or in businesses relatedtaking further measures to substantive areas important toaddress those concerns that were the basis for the underlying shareholder vote.

Board Service Policies

Under our business, and in these positions have gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. Our nominees also have experience working with or servingCorporate Governance Principles, directors who are CEOs of public companies should not serve on more than two boards of public companies besides their own, and no director should serve on more than five boards of public companies, including the TJX Board. Under our Audit Committee Charter, members of the Audit Committee should not serve on the audit committee of more than two other public companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that anon-employee director is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times the annual retainer paid to the director within five years of initial election to the Board. New board members are also expected to acquire at least $10,000 of our common stock outright upon joining the Board. As described further in the CD&A, our executive officers are also subject to stock ownership guidelines. As of April 9, 2018, all of our directors and board committees of other public companies, and each ofexecutive officers were in compliance with our nominees has an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends. In addition, our nominees have prior service onownership guidelines.

2018 Proxy Statement    7


LOGO

Board Attendance. During fiscal 2018, our Board which has provided them with exposure to bothmet six times. The independent directors also met separately at regularly scheduled executive sessions. It is our business and the industrypolicy, included in which we compete. We believeour Corporate Governance Principles, that all our nominees possessdirectors standing for reelection are expected to attend the professional and personal qualifications necessaryannual meeting of shareholders. All directors who stood for board service and have highlighted noteworthy attributes for each directorreelection at the 2017 Annual Meeting were in the individual biographies below.attendance.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS

The individuals listed below have been nominatedBoard of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, Finance, and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 2016 Annual Meetingan Executive Committee, each described in more detail below. All members of Stockholdersthe Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, and until their successorsFinance Committees are duly electednon-employee directors and qualified. All of our nominees are current directors. Other than William H. Swanson, who was electedmeet the independence standards adopted by the Board in January 2015,compliance with NYSE listing standards for that committee. The Executive Committee includes our Executive Chairman who is not independent. While each committee has specific, designated responsibilities, each committee may act on behalf of the entire Board to the extent designated by the respective charter or otherwise by the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and makes recommendations on the composition of our standing committees.

Our committees regularly invite other Board members to join their meetings and, as necessary, otherwise report on their activities to the entire Board. The table below provides information about membership and meetings of these committees during fiscal 2018:

  Name

 

    

Audit

 

    

Corporate

 

Governance

    

Executive

 

Compensation

    

Finance

 

    

Executive

 

  Zein Abdalla

 

         +

 

         +

 

     

  José B. Alvarez1

 

    +

 

         +

 

          

  Alan M. Bennett

 

              *

 

    +

 

     

  David T. Ching

 

    +

 

    +

 

               

  Ernie Herrman

 

                         

  Michael F. Hines

 

    *

 

              +

 

     

  Amy B. Lane

 

    +

 

              *

 

    +

 

  Carol Meyrowitz

 

                        *

 

  Jackwyn L. Nemerov

 

              +

 

          

  John F. O’Brien

 

                        +

 

  Willow B. Shire

 

         *

 

    +

 

          

  Number of meetings during fiscal 2018

 

    12

 

    4

 

    8

 

    4

 

    

 

*Committee Chairman

1Mr. Alvarez is not standing for election at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Each director attended at least 75% of all were electedmeetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Mr. Hines, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Mr. Ching; Ms. Lane

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements and oversight of the financial reporting process. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and discussing with management, internal auditors, and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;

8    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;

overseeing the audit process, including the annual audit;

overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;

establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters;

selecting, retaining, negotiating, and approving the compensation of, overseeing, and if necessary, replacing, the independent registered public accounting firm;

pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

other matters as the Board considers appropriate.

As part of these responsibilities, in addition to assuring the regular rotation of the lead partner of the independent auditor, as required by law, the Audit Committee, including its Chairman, is involved in the selection of, and reviews and evaluates the performance of, the independent auditor, including the lead audit partner, and further considers whether there should be regular rotation of the audit function among firms. Please see the Audit Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Shire, Chairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Ching

The Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

recommending director nominees to the Board;

developing, recommending to the Board, by our stockholders. Bernard Cammarata, after more than 25 years on our Board and nearly 40 years of servicereviewing corporate governance principles;

in concert with the Company, has decidedBoard, reviewing our policies with respect to retire as Chairmansignificant issues of corporate social and public responsibility, including political contributions and activities, environmental and sustainability activities, and charitable giving;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors and the structure and frequency of Board meetings;

reviewing the functions, duties, and composition of the committees of the Board effective atand compensation for Board and committee members;

recommending processes for the 2015 Annual Meetingannual evaluations of Stockholders. After his retirement fromthe performance of the Board, Mr. Cammarata will remain witheach individual director, the Company in an advisory role as FounderChairman, the independent Lead Director, and Executive Advisor.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as director.

Zein Abdalla, 56

Director since 2012

Mr. Abdalla was the President of PepsiCo, Inc., a leading global food, snackcommittee and beverage company, from September 2012 through his retirement in December 2014, prior to which he served as CEO of PepsiCo Europe, a division of PepsiCo, starting in November 2009 and as President, PepsiCo Europe Region starting in January 2006. Mr. Abdalla previously held a variety of senior positions at PepsiCo since he joined that company in 1995, including as General Manager of PepsiCo’s European Beverage Business, General Manager of Tropicana Europe and Franchise Vice Presidentits chair;

establishing performance objectives for Pakistan and the Gulf region. Mr. Abdalla’s executive experience with a large global company has given him expertise in corporate management, including in emerging markets, operations, brand management, distribution and global strategy.

José B. Alvarez, 52

Director since 2007

Mr. Alvarez has been a member of the faculty of the Harvard Business School since 2009. From August 2008 through December 2008, Mr. Alvarez was the Global Executive Vice President for Business Development for Ahold, a global supermarket retail company. From 2001 to August 2008, he held various executive positions with Stop & Shop/ Giant-Landover, Ahold’s U.S. subsidiary, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover from 2006 to 2008 and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Logistics from 2004 to 2006. Previously, he served in executive positions at Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. and began his career at the Jewel Food Stores subsidiary of American Stores Company in 1990. Mr. Alvarez is also a director of United Rentals, Inc. and served on the board of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. from 2011 until 2013. Mr. Alvarez’s long career in retail has given him broad experience in large retail chain management, including store management, supply chain, logistics, distribution and strategy.

Alan M. Bennett, 64

Director since 2007

Mr. Bennett served as the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of H&R Block Inc., a tax services provider, from July 2010 to May 2011 and was previously Interimthe Chief Executive Officer from November 2007 through August 2008. He was Senior Vice Presidentagainst such objectives; and Chief Financial Officer

overseeing the maintenance and a Memberpresentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Please see the Corporate Governance Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mr. Bennett, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Ms. Nemerov; Ms. Shire

The ECC’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and approving the structure and philosophy of compensation of the Office of the Chairman of Aetna, Inc., a diversified healthcare benefits company, from 2001 to 2007, and previously held other senior financial management positions at Aetna after joining in 1995. Mr. Bennett held various senior management roles in finance and sales/marketing at Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation, formerly Armstrong Rubber Company, from 1981 to 1995 and began his career with Ernst & Ernst (now Ernst & Young LLP). Mr. Bennett is also a director of Halliburton Company and Fluor Corporation and was a director of H&R Block from 2008 to 2011. Mr. Bennett’s senior leadership roles in two significant financial businesses provide him with executive experience in managing very large businesses and change management as well as financial expertise including financial management, taxes, accounting, controls, finance and financial reporting.

David T. Ching, 62

Director since 2007

Mr. Ching was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, from 1994 to January 2013 and has consulted through DTC Associates LLC, focusing on management consulting and technology services, since 2013. Previously, Mr. Ching was the General Manager for British American Consulting Group, a software and consulting firm focusing on the distribution and retail industry. He also worked for Lucky Stores Inc., a subsidiary of American Stores Company from 1979 to 1993, including serving as the Senior Vice President of Information Systems. Mr. Ching’s strong technological experience and related management positions in the retail industry provide Mr. Ching expertise including information systems, information security and controls, technology implementation and operation, reporting and distribution in the retail industry.

Michael F. Hines, 59

Director since 2007

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to March 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Hines is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc., where he serves as non-executive Chairman, and Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management and financial management.

Amy B. Lane, 62

Director since 2005

Ms. Lane was a Managing Director and Group Leader of the Global Retailing Investment Banking Group at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., from 1997 until her retirement in 2002. Ms. Lane previously served as a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers, Inc., where she founded and led the retail industry investment banking unit. Ms. Lane is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc., NextEra Energy, Inc. and a member of the board of trustees of Urban Edge Properties. Ms. Lane’s experience as the leader of two investment banking practices covering the global retailing industry has given her substantial experience with financial services, capital markets, finance and accounting, capital structure, acquisitions and divestitures in that industry as well as management, leadership and strategy.

Carol Meyrowitz, 61

Director since 2006

Ms. Meyrowitz has been Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, and senior Associates;

2018 Proxy Statement    9


LOGO

approving the compensation and benefits, including awards of TJX since January 2007, a director since September 2006stock options, bonuses, and also servedother awards and incentives, of our executive officers and other Associates in those categories as Presidentare from October 2005time to January 2011. She served as Senior Executive Vice Presidenttime identified by the ECC;

determining the compensation of TJX from 2004 until January 2005, Executive Vice President of TJX from 2001 to 2004 and President of Marmaxx from 2001 to January 2005. From January 2005 until October 2005, she was employed in an advisory role for TJX and consulted for Berkshire Partners LLC, a private equity firm. From

1983 to 2001, she held various senior management and merchandising positions with Marmaxx and with Chadwick’s of Boston and Hit or Miss, former divisions of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz is also a director of Staples, Inc. and was a director of Amscan Holdings, Inc. from 2005 to 2012. Asthe Chief Executive Officer, including awards of stock options, bonuses, and other awards and incentives, based on the evaluation by the Corporate Governance Committee of the Company, and throughperformance of the many other positions Ms. Meyrowitz has held with TJX, Ms. Meyrowitz has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects of off-price retail, including innovation, strategy, buying, distribution, marketing, real estate, finance and accounting, and international operations.

John F. O’Brien, 72

Director since 1996

Mr. O’Brien is the retired Chief Executive Officer and Presidentsuch other factors as the ECC deems relevant;

determining the performance goals and performance criteria under our incentive plans;

approving the terms of Allmerica Financial Corporation (now The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.), an insuranceemployment of our executive officers, including employment and diversified financial services company, holding those positions from 1995 to 2002. Mr. O’Brien previously held executive positions at Fidelity Investments, an asset management firm, including Group Managing Directorother agreements with such officers;

overseeing the administration of FMR Corporation, Chairmanour incentive plans and other compensatory plans and funding arrangements; and

reviewing and undertaking other matters that the Board or the ECC deems appropriate, such as the review of Institutional Services Company and Chairman of Brokerage Services, Inc. Mr. O’Brien serves as our Lead Director. Mr. O’Brien is also non-executive Chairman and a director of Cabot Corporation, a director of LKQ Corporation and a director of a family of 93 registered mutual funds managed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment management advisory firm. Mr. O’Brien has substantial executive experience with two financial services businesses, giving him expertise including general management and oversight with respect to strategy, financial planning, insurance, operations, finance and capital structure.

Willow B. Shire, 67

Director since 1995

Ms. Shire was an executive consultant with Orchard Consulting Group from 1994 until January 2015, specializing in leadership development and strategic problem solving. Previously, she was Chairpersonsuccession plan for the Computer Systems Public Policy Project within the National Academy of Science. She also held various positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer hardware manufacturer, for 18 years, including Vice President and Officer, Health Industries Business Unit. Through her consulting experience and prior business experience, Ms. Shire brings expertise in leadership development, talent assessment, change management, human resources and development practices, cultural assessment and strategic problem solving.

William H. Swanson, 66

Director since February 2015

Mr. Swanson was the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers.

Pursuant to its charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and is permitted by applicable law, regulations, and listing standards.

The ECC also reviews our compensation policies and practices for our Associates to determine whether they give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. See Compensation Program Risk Assessment, below.

Please see the ECC charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

FINANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Lane, Chairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Bennett; Mr. Hines

The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our financing plans and strategies; financial condition; capital structure; tax strategies, liabilities, and payments; dividends; stock repurchase programs; and insurance programs;

approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies, commodity hedging policies, capital investment criteria, and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and

reviewing investment policies as well as the performance and actuarial status of Raytheon Company, a technologyour pension and innovation leader specializing in defense, securityother retirement benefit plans.

Please see the Finance Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Ms. Meyrowitz, Chairman; Ms. Lane; Mr. O’Brien

The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and civil markets throughouthas the world, from July 2003 until March 2014 and served as Chairmanauthority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the boardBoard.

10    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

COMPENSATION PROGRAM RISK ASSESSMENT

As part of Raytheonour regular enterprise risk assessment process overseen by the Board and described above, we review the risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. In fiscal 2018, the ECC reviewed TJX’s Associate compensation policies and practices and determined that they do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The ECC’s assessment considered what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive and broad-based compensation plans and arrangements worldwide; how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated, and managed; and whether those potential risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX.

The assessment was led by our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, whose responsibilities include leadership of our enterprise risk management process, and included consultation with and input from, January 2004 until his retirement in September 2014. Mr. Swanson had a careeramong others, executive officers, senior human resources and financial executives, the ECC’s independent compensation consultant, and internal and external legal counsel. The assessment considered, among other things, factors intended to mitigate risk at TJX, including:

•  Board and committee oversight;

•  the ECC’s use of an independent compensation consultant;

•  compensation mix, caps on payouts, and emphasis on objective performance-based pay;

•  market checks;

•  Associate communications and training; and

•  company policies, internal controls, and risk management initiatives.

The assessment also considered the balance of more than 42 years with Raytheon, during which he held a wide range of leadership positions including serving as President of Raytheon from July 2002 to May 2004, Executive Vice President of Raytheonpotential risks and President of its Electronic Systems division from January 2000 to July 2002, and Executive Vice President of Raytheon and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Raytheon Systems Company from January 1998 to January 2000. Mr. Swanson is also a director of NextEra Energy, Inc. Mr. Swanson’s qualifications include expertise in strategic planning, global business operations and extensive leadership experience from serving as chief executive of a Fortune 200 company.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Integrity has been a core tenet of TJX since our inception. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in compliance with all laws and regulations that relaterewards related to our businesses.compensation programs and the role of those programs in implementing our corporate strategy.

CODES OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND OTHER POLICIES

Global Code of Conduct for Associates. We have Corporate Governance Principles, a Global Code of Conduct for our Associates that sets out our expectations that Associates conduct business with honesty and integrity and treat others with dignity and respect. Our Global Code of Conduct prohibits harassment, discrimination, and retaliation and addresses professional conduct, including employment policies, ethical business dealings, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, intellectual property rights, and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. We have a Code of Conduct helpline to allow Associates to voice their concerns. We also have procedures for Associates to report complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters, which are available on our website, tjx.com.

Code of Ethics for TJX Executiveswritten charters for each and Director Code of our Board committeesBusiness Conduct and Ethics. As noted above, we have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The current versionsEthics that is designed to promote honest and ethical conduct; compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and the avoidance of these documentsconflicts of interest for our Board members. We also have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, and other itemssenior operating, financial, and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and the Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as required, within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a posting on our website or by filing a Current Report on Form8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

Our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation, and Finance Committees are available on our website, tjx.com, in the Investors section under Governance: Governance Documents. Information appearing on tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

2018 Proxy Statement    11


LOGO

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

For more than 40 years, TJX has been focused on delivering great value to our customers through the combination of brand, fashion, price, and quality. At the same time, we are committed to our corporate responsibility mission of bringing value to our many important stakeholders—our Associates, customers, communities, vendors, and shareholders.

With our long-held principles of respect, honesty, and integrity, central to our efforts, our Corporate Responsibility program has evolved over time and has reflected our ‘smart for business, good for the world’ thinking. We categorize our global corporate responsibility efforts under four strategic pillars:

Our Workplace, which reflects our commitment to our Associates worldwide, including fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment and creating opportunities through training and development. We are committed to creating a workplace where all Associates feel welcomed at the company, valued for their contributions, and fully engaged with our business.

Our Communities, which focuses on our mission to help vulnerable families and children access the resources and opportunities they need to build a better future. Through charitable giving, volunteer efforts, community partnerships, andin-store fundraising, we seek to support organizations that provide basic needs for those in poverty, education and training forat-risk young people, research and care for life-threatening illnesses, and safety from domestic violence.

Environmental Sustainability, which reflects our longstanding commitment to pursue initiatives that are smart for our business and good for the environment. We have continually focused on meaningful initiatives that are aligned with our business goals to help reduce our environmental impact, drive operational cost reductions, and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to environmental sustainability. Key initiatives include increasing energy efficiency, reducing fuel usage, recycling and waste management, and greener building designs. We remain focused on reducing our carbon footprint and are driving towards the achievement of our greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. We are pleased to report we remain on track to meet our 2020 GHG reduction target, established in 2014, and we have begun the process of considering options for our next quantitative emissions reduction goal.

Responsible Business, which reflects our commitment to operating responsibly, sourcing ethically, and ensuring strong corporate governance and compliance. We believe that operating our business responsibly and ethically positions us to address the interests of our stakeholders while also creating long-term value for our shareholders.

We remain focused on continuously enhancing our programs and making a positive, sustainable impact on the world in which we live and conduct our business. To learn more about our evolving efforts, please visit the Responsibility section of our website at tjx.com/responsibility.

COMMUNICATING WITH OUR BOARD

We are interested in hearing from our shareholders and communicate regularly with shareholders throughout the year. Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, thenon-management directors or the independent directors as a group, the Lead Director, or any other specified individual director or directors.

To contact us, address your correspondence to the individual or group you would like to reach and send it to us, c/o Office of the Secretary/Legal Department:

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

The Secretary will forward these communications to the relevant group or individual. Shareholders and others can communicate complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters by writing to the

12    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Audit Committee, c/o Corporate Internal Audit Director, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Under its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which, in addition to TJX, any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers (or their immediate family members), or any greater than 5% shareholders (or their immediate family members) is a participant and has a direct or indirect material interest, as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates, or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside, or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal 2018, asister-in-law of Mr. Sherr and a daughter of Ms. Meyrowitz were employed by TJX. They received compensation from us for fiscal 2018 and the beginning of fiscal 2019 totaling approximately $281,720 and $133,920, respectively, consistent with other Associates at their levels and responsibilities. They also participated in company benefit plans generally available to similarly situated Associates. As described below in Beneficial Ownership, The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that it was the beneficial owner of more than 5% of TJX’s outstanding common stock. TJX expects to pay The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its affiliates approximately $1,885,420 for services primarily provided during fiscal 2018 and the first quarter of fiscal 2019 in connection with TJX’s retirement savings plans (including recordkeeping, trustee, and related services). Our Corporate Governance Committee discussed and approved or ratified these transactions, consistent with our review process described above.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee operates in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the NYSE and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that two of our members (Mr. Hines and Ms. Lane) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

We met 12 times during fiscal 2018, including 4 meetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for fiscal 2018 with management and PwC. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and the potential effects of any disclosed relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors, and PwC TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget, and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and audit results.

We reviewed and discussed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB Auditing Standard 1301, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without

2018 Proxy Statement    13


LOGO

management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019, subject to ratification by TJX’s shareholders.

Audit Committee

Michael F. Hines,Chairman

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane

AUDITOR FEES

The aggregate fees that TJX was billed for professional services rendered by PwC for fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017 were:

  (In thousands)

 

  

2018

 

   

2017

 

 

  Audit

 

  $

 

8,730

 

 

 

  $

 

8,262

 

 

 

  Audit Related

 

   

 

476

 

 

 

   

 

790

 

 

 

  Tax

 

   

 

871

 

 

 

   

 

840

 

 

 

  All Other

 

   

 

66

 

 

 

   

 

55

 

 

 

  Total

 

  $

 

10,143

 

 

 

  $

 

9,947

 

 

 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, review of documents filed with the SEC, review of and opinions on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and, in fiscal 2017, providing a comfort letter in connection with TJX’s issuance of notes.

Audit related fees were for consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit plan and medical claims audits.

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, transfer pricing and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.

All other fees were primarily for services related to our environmental sustainability program.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the company’s retention of PwC. The Audit Committeepre-approves all audit services and all permittednon-audit services by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chairman, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to our governance can be found on our corporate website, www.tjx.com, as described belowbookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions orcontribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services, or human resource consulting. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates whether TJX’s use of PwC for permittednon-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s provision ofnon-audit services, which were approved inOnline Availability of Information. advance, was compatible with their independence.

14    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Independence

Independence Determination.  OurAs provided in our Corporate Governance Principles, provide that at leasttwo-thirds of the members of our Board willshould be independent directors. TheAn independent director is one who the Board evaluates any relationships of each directorhas affirmatively determined has no material relationship with TJX and makes(either directly or as a partner, shareholder, or officer of an affirmative determination whether or not each director is independent.organization that has a relationship with the company). To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical independence standards which are available in our Corporate Governance Principles that are based on our website, www.tjx.com.the independence standards required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) for its listed companies. As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board consideredconsiders the recommendation of our Corporate Governance CommitteeCommittee’s independence assessment and reviewedrecommendation and reviews any transactions and relationships between each non-management director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX. The purpose of this review was to determine whetherTJX, in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles (see Transactions with Related Persons, p. 13). To the extent there were any such relationships or transactions, and if so,the Board considers whether they wereare inconsistent with a determination that the director wasis independent.

As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that nine9 directors of our current11-member Board (82%) are independent: Zein Abdalla, José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, Jackwyn L. Nemerov, John F. O’Brien, and Willow B. Shire and William H. Swanson. The same determination was made previously with respect to Dawn Lepore, who served on our Board until June 2014. EachShire. None of these directors methad any relationship with TJX that implicated our categorical standards of independence. Bernard Cammarata,Carol Meyrowitz, as Executive Chairman, and Carol Meyrowitz,Ernie Herrman, as Chief Executive Officer and President, are employed byexecutive officers of TJX and are therefore not independent. Mr. Cammarata is retiring from

Board Diversity

As a global company with approximately 249,000 Associates at our fiscal year-end, we consider diversity among our Associates, customers, vendors, and other business associates to be part of who we are and core to our culture. At the Board effective atlevel and throughout our organization, we strive to promote the 2015 Annual Meetingbenefits of leveraging differences, fostering inclusion, and thereforepromoting a talented and diverse workforce. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender, and ethnicity/race and that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experiences, and educational backgrounds to provide sound, expert, and prudent guidance on our operations, strategy, and interests.

The Corporate Governance Committee does not standing for reelection.have a formal diversity policy that is applied when evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, but takes diversity, including geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity, into account among the many factors it considers. Each individual is evaluated in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that the Committee believes can best continue the success of our business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its collective

2018 Proxy Statement    5


LOGO

diversity of experience. The Committee considers whether candidates have a general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large, global, and complex publicly traded company in today’s business environment; understanding of our business and industry; professional background and leadership experience; experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies; and personal accomplishments.

We value the many kinds of diversity reflected in our Board and nominees.

Board NomineesComposition

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Board Assessment

The Board believes it is important to have highly engaged directors and Service at TJXthat the Board’s composition be aligned with the changing needs of the company for current and future business environments. We have a regular, comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance and composition of our Board. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the Board as a whole, our Chairman, our independent Lead Director, and each of our individual directors.

Currently, our process, which we review annually through the Corporate Governance Committee, includes both self-assessments and peer review of individual directors and of the Board overall, including an assessment of skills and overall effectiveness, and a consideration of the current and future needs of the Board. In addition, each of our independent committees conducts an annual self-assessment of the committee and the chair, with a process overseen by the Corporate Governance Committee.

Director Qualifications and Nominations.  

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals to be director nominees who, in the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee, have high personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values; have demonstrated ability perspective and judgmentjudgment; and will be effective incommitted to collectively serving the long-term best interests of our stockholders. As described below inBoard Expertise and Diversity, theshareholders. The Corporate Governance Committee considers a range of factors whenconsideringwhen considering individual candidates, includingcandidates. These factors include professional experience, personal integrity and potential contributions to the Board as a whole. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee considers each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skillsparticularly in light of our business including thoseand current needs for the Board, independence, and geographic, gender, age, ethnic, and racial diversity (discussed above). The Committee seeks nominees who have established strong professional reputations with experience in substantive areas that are identified in the biographical information contained above underNominees and Their Qualifications.important to our business, such as:

•   international operations and growth;

•   marketing and brand management;

•   sales, buying, and distribution;

•   accounting, finance, and capital structure;

•   succession planning;

•  strategic planning and leadership of complex
organizations;

•  human resources and talent development
practices;

•  risk oversight;

•  strategy, growth, and innovation.

6    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Finding Candidates. The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by stockholders,shareholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means that may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as chief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries; considering proposalsrecommendations from a range of sources, such as the Board of Directors, management or other Associates, stockholdersshareholders, and industry contacts; and engaging a third-party search firm to expand our search and assist in compiling information about possible candidates. Mr. Swanson was recommended to the Committee for consideration as a board nominee by our Chief Executive Officer, reviewed by our Corporate Governance Committee and then elected by the full Board effective the beginning of fiscal 2016.

The Corporate Governance Committee has a policy with respect to submission by stockholdersfor shareholder recommendations of candidates for director nominees, which is available on our website. Any stockholdershareholder may submit, in writing, one candidate for consideration for each stockholdershareholder meeting at which directors are to be electedelected. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate must submit the recommendation by noa date not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to stockholdersshareholders in connection with the previous year’s Annual Meeting.annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX,

TJX:

Office of the Secretary/ Legal Department

The TJX Companies, Inc.,

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. A01701

As described in the policy, a recommendation must includeprovide specified information about, certifications from, and consents and agreements of, the candidate, as described in the policy.candidate. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by stockholders or othersshareholders in the same manner as candidates from other sources. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Board Expertise and Diversity. As a global company with approximately 198,000 Associates at our fiscal year end, we consider diversity among our Associates, customers and vendors to be part of who we are and core to our culture. At the Board level and throughout the organization we strive to promote the benefits of leveraging differences and promoting a talented and diverse workforce. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender and ethnicity/race and that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance on our operations and interests. In evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, but takes into account many factors, including general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in today’s business environment, understanding of our business and industry, professional background and leadership experience, experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies, personal accomplishment, independence and geographic, gender, age, ethnic and racial diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that the Committee believes can best perpetuate the success of our business and represents stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its collective diversity of experience. All of our directors are financially literate, and, as described in our Audit Committee Report, two members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts. We value the many kinds of diversity reflected in our Board and nominees.Majority Voting

OurMajority Voting.by-laws Our by-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles require any incumbent nominee for director to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to the Secretary of TJX at or priorleast 14 days in advance of the distribution date for proxy solicitation materials for the shareholder meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. This resignation would be effective only if (a) the director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election and (b) the Board accepts the resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of this kind of resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of stockholders,shareholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and its stockholdersshareholders and will take what it deems to be appropriate action, which may include accepting or rejecting the resignation or taking further measures to address those concerns that were the basis for the underlying stockholdershareholder vote.

Board Service Policies. It is our policy that no director shall be nominated who has attained the age of 75 prior to or on the date of his or her election. Policies

Under our Corporate Governance Principles, directors who are CEOs of public companies should not serve on more than two boards of public companies besides their own, and no director should serve on more than five boards of public companies.companies, including the TJX Board. Under our Audit Committee Charter, members of the Audit Committee should not serve on the audit committee of more than two audit committees of other public companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, and the Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that anon-employee director is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times the annual retainer paid to the director within five years of initial election to the Board. New board members are also expected to acquire at least $10,000 of our common stock outright upon joining the Board. As described further in the CD&A, our executive officers are also subject to stock ownership guidelines. As of April 9, 2018, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with our ownership guidelines.

Board Committees and Meetings

2018 Proxy Statement    7


LOGO

Board Attendance.Attendance. During fiscal 2015,2018, our Board met sevensix times. Each of our directors attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member. The independent directors also met separately at regularly scheduled executive sessions. It is our policy, included in our Corporate Governance Principles, that all directors standing for reelection are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders. All directors who stood for reelection at the 20142017 Annual Meeting were in attendance.

BOARD COMMITTEES AND MEETINGS

The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, Finance, and an Executive Compensation and Finance.Committee, each described in more detail below. All members of the Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive Compensation, and Finance Committees are independent directors.non-employee directors and meet the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with NYSE listing standards for that committee. The Executive Committee includes our Executive Chairman who is not independent. While each committee has specific, designated responsibilities, each committee may act on behalf of the entire Board to the extent designated by the respective charter or otherwise by the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and makes recommendations on the composition of our standing committees.

Our committees regularly invite other Board members to join their meetings and, as necessary, otherwise report on their activities to the entire Board. The table below provides information about membership and meetings of these committees during fiscal 2015:2018:

 

Name1

 Audit Corporate
Governance
 Executive Executive
Compensation
 Finance

Name

    

Audit

 

    

Corporate

 

Governance

    

Executive

 

Compensation

    

Finance

 

    

Executive

 

Zein Abdalla

  +             +

 

         +

 

     

José B. Alvarez

 +   +  

José B. Alvarez1

    +

 

         +

 

          

Alan M. Bennett

    * +              *

 

    +

 

     

Bernard Cammarata

   *   

David T. Ching

 + +        +

 

    +

 

               

Ernie Herrman

                         

Michael F. Hines

 *    +    *

 

              +

 

     

Amy B. Lane

 +  +  *    +

 

              *

 

    +

 

Dawn Lepore2

     +

Carol Meyrowitz

                              *

 

Jackwyn L. Nemerov

              +

 

          

John F. O’Brien

   + +                          +

 

Willow B. Shire

  *  +           *

 

    +

 

          

Number of meetings during fiscal 2015

 12 4 0 6 4

Number of meetings during fiscal 2018

    12

 

    4

 

    8

 

    4

 

    

 

*Committee Chairman

1Mr. Alvarez is not standing for election at the 2018 Annual Meeting.

Each director attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member.

 

 

* Committee Chair.AUDIT COMMITTEE

1.

Mr. Swanson joined the Board and the Executive Compensation Committee as of the start of fiscal 2016.

2. Ms. Lepore served on the Board and the Finance Committee until June 2014.

Audit Committee. (Mr. Hines,Chair; Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Mr. Ching; Ms. Lane) Lane

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the company’s financial statements and oversight of the financial reporting process. Each member of the Audit Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by members of the committee annually. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and discussing with management, internal auditors, and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;

 

8    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;

 

overseeing the internal and external audit process, including the scope and implementation of the annual audit;

 

overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;

selecting, retaining, approving the compensation of, overseeing and if necessary, replacing the independent registered public accounting firm, evaluating the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the lead audit partner;

 

establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters;

selecting, retaining, negotiating, and approving the compensation of, overseeing, and if necessary, replacing, the independent registered public accounting firm;

pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

 

reviewing other matters as the Board deemsconsiders appropriate.

InAs part of these responsibilities, in addition to assuring the regular rotation of the lead partner of the independent auditor, as required by law, the Audit Committee, including its Chair, has beenChairman, is involved in the selection of, and reviews and evaluates the performance of, the independent auditor, including the lead audit partner, and further considers whether there should be regular rotation of the audit function among firms. Please see the Audit Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

Executive Compensation Committee. (Mr. Bennett,Chair;

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Shire, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez;Abdalla; Mr. O’Brien; Ms. Shire; Mr. Swanson) Ching

The Executive Compensation Committee, orCorporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

recommending director nominees to the ECC, is responsible for overseeing executive compensation and benefits. Each member of the ECC is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted byBoard;

developing, recommending to the Board, and those required by NYSE listing standards. The ECC operates underreviewing corporate governance principles;

in concert with the termsBoard, reviewing our policies with respect to significant issues of a written charter which is reviewed bycorporate social and public responsibility, including political contributions and activities, environmental and sustainability activities, and charitable giving;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors and the membersstructure and frequency of Board meetings;

reviewing the functions, duties, and composition of the committees of the Board and compensation for Board and committee annually. Pursuantmembers;

recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, each individual director, the Chairman, the independent Lead Director, and each committee and its chair;

establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and

overseeing the maintenance and presentation to itsthe Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Please see the Corporate Governance Committee charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and is permitted by applicable law, regulations and listing standards. available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Mr. Bennett, Chairman; Mr. Alvarez; Ms. Nemerov; Ms. Shire

The ECC’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and approving the structure and philosophy of compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, other executive officers, and senior Associates;

2018 Proxy Statement    9


LOGO

 

approving the compensation and benefits, including awards of stock options, bonuses, and other awards and incentives, of our executive officers and other Associates in those categories as are from time to time identified by the ECC;

 

determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including awards of stock options, bonuses, and other awards and incentives, based on the evaluation by the Corporate Governance Committee of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and such other factors as the ECC deems relevant;

 

determining the performance goals and performance criteria under our incentive plans;

 

approving the terms of employment of our executive officers, including employment and other agreements with such officers;

 

overseeing the administration of our incentive plans and other compensatory plans and funding arrangements; and

reviewing and undertaking other matters that the Board or the ECC deems appropriate, such as the review of our succession plan for the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers;officers.

Pursuant to its charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and

overseeing the administration of our incentive plans is permitted by applicable law, regulations, and other compensatory plans and funding arrangements.
listing standards.

The ECC also reviews our compensation policies and practices for our Associates to determine whether they give rise to risks whichthat are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.company. SeeCompensation Program Risk Assessment,below.

Corporate Governance Committee. (Ms. Shire,Chair;Please see the ECC charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

FINANCE COMMITTEE

Ms. Lane, Chairman; Mr. Abdalla; Mr. Ching) The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending nominees to serve as members of our Board and for overseeing our corporate governance practices. Each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with NYSE listing standards. The Corporate Governance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. The Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

recommending director nominees to the Board;

developing and reviewing corporate governance principles;

reviewing our policies with respect to corporate public responsibility, including charitable and political contributions and political advocacy;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors, including retirement policies, the size of the Board and the meeting frequency of the Board, and reviewing the functions, duties and composition of the committees of the Board and compensation for Board and committee members;

recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, the Chairman, the independent Lead Director and each committee and its chair;

establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and

overseeing the maintenance and presentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Executive Committee. (Mr. Cammarata,Chair; Ms. Lane; Mr. O’Brien) The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the Board.

Finance Committee. (Ms. Lane,Chair; Mr. Bennett; Mr. Hines) Hines

The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Finance Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things:

 

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our financing plans and strategies; financial condition; capital structure; tax strategies, liabilities, and payments; dividends; stock repurchase programsprograms; and insurance programs;

 

approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies, commodity hedging policies, capital investment criteria, and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and

 

reviewing investment policies as well as the performance and actuarial status of our pension and other retirement benefit plans.

Board Leadership Structure. Our Board annually elects a Chairman ofPlease see the Finance Committee charter, available on our website, tjx.com, for further details.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Ms. Meyrowitz, Chairman; Ms. Lane; Mr. O’Brien

The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board of Directors. Consistent with our Corporate Governance Principles, because our current Chairman, Bernard Cammarata, is not independent, our independent directors have elected an independent Lead Director, John F. O’Brien. In his role as Lead Director, among other duties, Mr. O’Brien:

meets at least quarterly with our Chief Executive Officer, and with other senior officers as necessary;

attends regular management business review meetings;

scheduleson specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the independent directors, presides at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including meetings of the independent directors;

serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and Company management and approves meeting schedules and agendas;

attends the meetings of each Board committee; and

undertakes other responsibilities designated by the independent directors.

The Board believes that the separate roles of Mr. Cammarata, Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. O’Brien have been in the best interests of TJX and its stockholders. Mr. Cammarata has wide-ranging, in-depth knowledge of our business arising from his many years of service to TJX and, as a result, has provided effective leadership for the Board and support for Ms. Meyrowitz and other management. With Mr. Cammarata’s retirement, the Board plans to elect Ms. Meyrowitz to the additional position of Chairman at the Board meeting immediately following the annual meeting of stockholders. Given her close involvement with the operations of TJX and her deep knowledge of our Company, our industry and our Board, the Board believes that it will continue to receive effective leadership with Ms. Meyrowitz serving as its Chairman as well as CEO, and that combining the roles at this time

is in the best interests of the stockholders and TJX. Mr. O’Brien will continue to serve as Lead Director and provide independence in TJX’s Board leadership, as provided in the Corporate Governance Principles, through his review and approval of Board meeting agendas, his participation in management business review meetings and his leadership of the independent directors.Board.

 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

10    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

COMPENSATION PROGRAM RISK ASSESSMENT

 

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports at Board meetings. In general terms:

•      The Boardreviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans, any major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects or reputation, acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning and receives regular reports from our Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk.

•      The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, compliance with orders and data security and receives regular reports from our Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk.

•      The ECC reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of compensation programs, plans and arrangements.

•      The Corporate Governance Committee reviews risks related to Board and CEO evaluations and management succession.

•      The Finance Committee reviews risks related to financing plans, investment policies, capital structure and liquidity, foreign exchange and commodity hedging, and investment performance, asset allocation strategies and funding of our benefit plans.

Compensation Program Risk Assessment. As part of our regular enterprise risk assessment process overseen by the Board and described above, we review the risks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. In fiscal 2015,2018, the ECC reviewed TJX’s Associate compensation policies and practices and determined that they do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The ECC’s assessment considered (a) what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive and broad-based compensation plans and arrangements worldwide, (b)worldwide; how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated, and managedmanaged; and (c) whether those potential risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX.

The assessment was led by our Chief Risk and Compliance Officer, and Director of Enterprise Risk, whose responsibilities include leadership of our enterprise risk management process, and included consultation with and input by,from, among others, executive officers, senior human resources and financial executives, the ECC’s independent compensation consultant, and internal and external legal counsel. This process included:The assessment considered, among other things, factors intended to mitigate risk at TJX, including:

 

a review of our compensation programs and practices, including our historical compensation practices;

•  Board and committee oversight;

•  the ECC’s use of an independent compensation consultant;

•  compensation mix, caps on payouts, and emphasis on objective performance-based pay;

•  market checks;

•  Associate communications and training; and

•  company policies, internal controls, and risk management initiatives.

analysis of programs or program features and practices that could potentially encourage excessive or unreasonable risk-taking of a material nature;

a review of business risks that these program features could potentially encourage;

identification of factors that mitigate business risks, including, among others, a review of compensation design and elements of the compensation programs; the balance among these program elements; role of compensation consultants and other advisors; authority and discretion of the Board, the ECC and other Board committees in compensation; controls and procedures; program and cultural elements and potential for individual or group influences; and

consideration ofThe assessment also considered the balance of potential risks and rewards related to our compensation programs and itsthe role of those programs in implementation ofimplementing our corporate strategy.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics and Other Policies

CODES OF CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND OTHER POLICIES

Global Code of Conduct for AssociatesAssociates.. We have a Global Code of Conduct for our Associates that requiressets out our expectations that Associates to conduct our business with integrity.honesty and integrity and treat others with dignity and respect. Our Global Code of Conduct coversprohibits harassment, discrimination, and retaliation and addresses professional conduct, including employment policies, ethical business dealings, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, intellectual property rights, and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. We have a Code of Conduct helpline to allow Associates to voice their concerns. We also have procedures for Associates to report complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters, which are available on our website, www.tjx.com.tjx.com.

Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and Director Code of Business Conduct and EthicsEthics.. As noted above, we have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is designed to promote honest and ethical conduct; compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations; and the avoidance of conflicts of interest for our Board members. We also have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior operating, financial, and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We also have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that promotes honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and the avoidance of conflicts of interest for our Board members. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives orand the Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, as required, within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a posting on our website posting or by filing a Current Report on Form8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors.

ONLINE AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

Our Corporate Governance Principles, provide that a director is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times the annual retainer paid to the directors within five yearsGlobal Code of initial election to the Board. New board members are also expected to acquire initially at least $10,000Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our common stock outright upon joining the Board. As described further on page 27 in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section, our executives are also subject to stock ownership guidelines. As of April 14, 2015, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with our ownership guidelines.

Board Annual Performance Reviews. We have a comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance of our Board and our directors. OurAudit, Corporate Governance, Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the entire Board, our Chairman, our independent Lead Director, each of our committeesExecutive, Executive Compensation, and its chair, and each of our individual directors. We review our process annually. In addition, each of our independent committees conducts an annual self-assessment.

Environmental Sustainability. As part of our continued commitment to corporate responsibility, TJX has long pursued initiatives thatFinance Committees are good for the environment as well as our profitability. We believe in the value of environmentally sound business practices throughout our operations, including energy and water conservation as well as recycling and waste reduction efforts. We understand that strong, sustainable business practices are important to our stakeholders, including stockholders, Associates, customers and the communities in which we work, and we work hard to evolve and improve our programs each year. Our corporate responsibility report, which highlights efforts we have made in these initiatives, is available on our website, www.tjx.com,tjx.com, in the Investors section under Governance: Governance Documents. Information appearing on tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

2018 Proxy Statement    11


LOGO

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

For more than 40 years, TJX has been focused on delivering great value to our customers through the combination of brand, fashion, price, and quality. At the same time, we are committed to our corporate responsibility mission of bringing value to our many important stakeholders—our Associates, customers, communities, vendors, and shareholders.

With our long-held principles of respect, honesty, and integrity, central to our efforts, our Corporate Responsibility section.program has evolved over time and has reflected our ‘smart for business, good for the world’ thinking. We categorize our global corporate responsibility efforts under four strategic pillars:

 

Online Availability of Information

Our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees are available on our website, www.tjx.com in the Corporate Responsibility: Attention to Governance section. Information appearing on www.tjx.com is not a part of, and is not incorporated by reference in, this proxy statement.

Communications

Our Workplace, which reflects our commitment to our Associates worldwide, including fostering a diverse and inclusive work environment and creating opportunities through training and development. We are committed to creating a workplace where all Associates feel welcomed at the company, valued for their contributions, and fully engaged with our Boardbusiness.

Our Communities, which focuses on our mission to help vulnerable families and children access the resources and opportunities they need to build a better future. Through charitable giving, volunteer efforts, community partnerships, andin-store fundraising, we seek to support organizations that provide basic needs for those in poverty, education and training forat-risk young people, research and care for life-threatening illnesses, and safety from domestic violence.

Environmental Sustainability, which reflects our longstanding commitment to pursue initiatives that are smart for our business and good for the environment. We have continually focused on meaningful initiatives that are aligned with our business goals to help reduce our environmental impact, drive operational cost reductions, and demonstrate our ongoing commitment to environmental sustainability. Key initiatives include increasing energy efficiency, reducing fuel usage, recycling and waste management, and greener building designs. We remain focused on reducing our carbon footprint and are driving towards the achievement of our greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. We are pleased to report we remain on track to meet our 2020 GHG reduction target, established in 2014, and we have begun the process of considering options for our next quantitative emissions reduction goal.

Responsible Business, which reflects our commitment to operating responsibly, sourcing ethically, and ensuring strong corporate governance and compliance. We believe that operating our business responsibly and ethically positions us to address the interests of our stakeholders while also creating long-term value for our shareholders.

We remain focused on continuously enhancing our programs and making a positive, sustainable impact on the world in which we live and conduct our business. To learn more about our evolving efforts, please visit the Responsibility section of our website at tjx.com/responsibility.

COMMUNICATING WITH OUR BOARD

We are interested in hearing from our shareholders and communicate regularly with shareholders throughout the year. Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Board, thenon-management directors or the independent directors as a group, specified individual directors or the Lead Director, by writingor any other specified individual director or directors.

To contact us, address your correspondence to suchthe individual or group you would like to reach and send it to us, c/o Office of the Secretary, Secretary/Legal Department:

The TJX Companies, Inc.,

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. 01701

The Secretary will forward suchthese communications to the relevant group or individual at or prior to the next Board meeting. Stockholdersindividual. Shareholders and others can communicate complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters by writing to the

12    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Audit Committee, c/o Corporate Internal Audit Director, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

Transactions with Related Persons

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Under its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, that Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which, in addition to TJX, is a participant and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers 5% stockholders and(or their immediate family membersmembers), or any greater than 5% shareholders (or their immediate family members) is a participant and has a direct or indirect material interest, as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates, or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside, or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Corporate Governance Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee. During fiscal 2015, Charles Bairos, brother-in-law2018, asister-in-law of Mr. Sherr and a daughter of Ms. Meyrowitz our CEO, and Barbara House, sister-in-law of Mr. Sherr, an executive officer, were employed by TJX. They received compensation from us for fiscal 2018 and the beginning of fiscal 2019 totaling approximately $281,720 and $133,920, respectively, consistent with other Associates at their respective levels and responsibilities, totaling approximately $173,151 and $201,857, respectively, for fiscal 2015, including salary and incentive compensation (cash and equity).responsibilities. They each also participated in company benefit plans generally available to similarly situated Associates. Lisa Cammarata, daughter of Mr. Cammarata, our Chairman, is an executive andAs described below in Beneficial Ownership, The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that it was the beneficial owner of onemore than 5% of the vendors from whichTJX’s outstanding common stock. TJX acquires merchandise from timeexpects to time. During fiscal 2015, TJX purchasedpay The Vanguard Group, Inc. and its affiliates approximately $4.7 million in merchandise from that vendor and$1,885,420 for services primarily provided during fiscal 2016 to2018 and the datefirst quarter of this proxy statement, approximately $0.8 million.fiscal 2019 in connection with TJX’s retirement savings plans (including recordkeeping, trustee, and related services). Our Corporate Governance Committee discussed and approved or ratified these transactions, consistent with our review process described above.

Audit Committee Report

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee operates in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the NYSE and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that two of our members (Mr. Hines and Ms. Lane) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

We met 12 times during fiscal 2015,2018, including four4 meetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, or PwC, TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for fiscal 20152018 with management and PwC. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence and the potential effects of any disclosed

relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors, and PwC TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget, and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.results.

We reviewed and discussed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB Auditing Standard 16,1301, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without

2018 Proxy Statement    13


LOGO

management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 20152018 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016,2019, subject to ratification by TJX’s stockholders.shareholders.

Audit Committee

Michael F. Hines,ChairChairman

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane

Auditor Fees

AUDITOR FEES

The aggregate fees that TJX paidwas billed for professional services rendered by PwC for fiscal 20152018 and fiscal 20142017 were:

 

In thousands2015 2014         

(In thousands)

  

2018

 

   

2017

 

 

Audit

$6,588  $5,482            $

 

8,730

 

 

 

  $

 

8,262

 

 

 

Audit Related

 1,017   403             

 

476

 

 

 

   

 

790

 

 

 

Tax

 861   495             

 

871

 

 

 

   

 

840

 

 

 

All Other

 73   227             

 

66

 

 

 

   

 

55

 

 

 

Total

$8,539  $6,607            $

 

10,143

 

 

 

  $

 

9,947

 

 

 

 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, review of documents filed with the SEC, review of and opinions on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and, in fiscal 2017, providing a comfort letter in connection with TJX’s issuance of notes.

 

Audit related fees were for services related to medical claims audits for fiscal 2014, consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit plan audits for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2015, and due diligence assistance for fiscal 2015.medical claims audits.

 

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, transfer pricing and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.

 

All other fees were primarily for services related to training for TJX’s internal audit department and advisory services in our on-going development of TJX’s conflict minerals program in compliance with Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.environmental sustainability program.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company’scompany’s retention of PwC. The Audit Committee of the Board pre-approves all audit services and all permittednon-audit services

by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chair,chairman, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions orcontribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to the audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services, or human resource consulting. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates whether TJX’s use of PwC for permittednon-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. The Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s provision ofnon-audit services, which were approved in advance, was compatible with their independence.

14    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees and Their Qualifications

The individuals listed below have been nominated and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

Our nominees have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizations, and in these positions have gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. We believe that all our nominees possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service. All of our nominees were previously elected to the Board by our shareholders.

Please see the Board Service at TJX section, above, for additional information about director qualifications and how we assess our nominees and think about Board composition. In addition, we have highlighted qualifications for each director in the individual biographies below.

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees.

Zein Abdalla, 59

Director since 2012

Mr. Abdalla was the President of PepsiCo, Inc., a leading global food, snack, and beverage company, from September 2012 through his retirement in December 2014, prior to which he served as CEO of PepsiCo Europe, a division of PepsiCo, starting in November 2009 and as President, PepsiCo Europe Region starting in January 2006. Mr. Abdalla previously held a variety of senior positions at PepsiCo since he joined that company in 1995, including as General Manager of PepsiCo’s European Beverage Business, General Manager of Tropicana Europe, and Franchise Vice President for Pakistan and the Gulf region.

Mr. Abdalla is also a director of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation.

Mr. Abdalla’s executive experience with a large global company has given him expertise in corporate management, including in emerging markets, operations, brand management, distribution, and global strategy.

Alan M. Bennett, 67

Director since 2007

Mr. Bennett served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of H&R Block, Inc., a tax services provider, from July 2010 until his retirement in May 2011 and was previously Interim Chief Executive Officer from November 2007 through August 2008. He was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a Member of the Office of the Chairman of Aetna Inc., a diversified healthcare benefits company, from 2001 to 2007, and previously held other senior financial management positions at Aetna after joining in 1995. Mr. Bennett held various senior management roles in finance and sales/marketing at Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation, formerly Armstrong Rubber Company, from 1981 to 1995 and began his career with Ernst & Ernst (now Ernst & Young LLP).

Mr. Bennett is also a director of Halliburton Company and Fluor Corporation.

Mr. Bennett’s senior leadership roles in two significant financial businesses provide him with executive experience in managing very large businesses and change management as well as financial expertise including financial management, taxes, accounting, controls, finance, and financial reporting.

2018 Proxy Statement    15


LOGO

David T. Ching, 65

Director since 2007

Mr. Ching was Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, from 1994 to January 2013 and has consulted through DTC Associates LLC, focusing on management consulting and technology services, since 2013. Previously, Mr. Ching was the General Manager for British American Consulting Group, a software and consulting firm focusing on the distribution and retail industry. He also worked for Lucky Stores Inc., a subsidiary of American Stores Company from 1979 to 1993, including serving as the Senior Vice President of Information Systems.

Mr. Ching’s strong technological experience and related management positions in the retail industry provide him expertise including in information systems, information security and controls, technology implementation and operation, reporting, and distribution in the retail industry.

Ernie Herrman, 57

Director since 2015

Mr. Herrman has been Chief Executive Officer of TJX since January 2016, a director since October 2015, and President since January 2011. He served as Senior Executive Vice President, Group President from August 2008 to January 2011, with responsibilities for Marmaxx, HomeGoods, and TJX Canada; President of Marmaxx from 2005 to 2008; and Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer of Marmaxx from 2004 to 2005. From 1989 to 2004, he held various merchandising positions with TJX.

As Chief Executive Officer and President of TJX, and through the many other positions Mr. Herrman has held with the Company, Mr. Herrman has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects ofoff-price retail, including merchandising, management, leadership development, strategy, international operations, marketing, real estate, buying, and distribution.

Michael F. Hines, 62

Director since 2007

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to March 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Mr. Hines is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc. and Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.

Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management, and financial management.

16    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Amy B. Lane, 65

Director since 2005

Ms. Lane was a Managing Director and Group Leader of the Global Retailing Investment Banking Group at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., from 1997 until her retirement in 2002. Ms. Lane previously served as a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers, Inc., where she founded and led the retail industry investment banking unit.

Ms. Lane is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc., NextEra Energy, Inc., and a member of the board of trustees of Urban Edge Properties.

Ms. Lane’s experience as the leader of two investment banking practices covering the global retailing industry has given her substantial experience with financial services, capital markets, finance and accounting, capital structure, acquisitions, and divestitures in that industry as well as management, leadership, and strategy.

Carol Meyrowitz, 64

Director since 2006

Ms. Meyrowitz has been Executive Chairman of the Board since January 2016 and a director since September 2006. She served as Chairman of the Board from June 2015 to January 2016 and as Chief Executive Officer of TJX from January 2007 to January 2016. In previous roles, Ms. Meyrowitz served as President of TJX from October 2005 to January 2011, Senior Executive Vice President of TJX from 2004 until January 2005, Executive Vice President of TJX from 2001 to 2004, and President of Marmaxx from 2001 to January 2005. From January 2005 until October 2005, she was employed in an advisory role for TJX and consulted for Berkshire Partners LLC, a private equity firm. From 1983 to 2001, Ms. Meyrowitz held various senior management and merchandising positions with Marmaxx and with Chadwick’s of Boston and Hit or Miss, former divisions of TJX.

Ms. Meyrowitz was also a director of Staples, Inc. from 2007 to 2017.

As Executive Chairman of the Board of TJX, and through the many other positions Ms. Meyrowitz has held with TJX, Ms. Meyrowitz has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects ofoff-price retail, including innovation, strategy, buying, distribution, marketing, real estate, finance and accounting, and international operations.

Jackwyn L. Nemerov, 66

Director since 2016

Ms. Nemerov was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Ralph Lauren Corporation, a global leader in premium lifestyle products, from November 2013 until November 2015. She served as Executive Vice President of Ralph Lauren Corporation from September 2004 until October 2013 and was a member of Ralph Lauren Corporation’s board of directors from 2007 until September 2015. Prior to her tenure there, she held multiple positions in the retail industry, including President and Chief Operating Officer of the Jones Apparel Group from 1998 to 2002.

Ms. Nemerov’s extensive retail, brand management and operations experience, as well as her related management positions in the apparel and retail industry, provide her with valuable expertise in supply chain management, manufacturing, merchandising, and licensing in the retail industry.

2018 Proxy Statement    17


LOGO

John F. O’Brien, 75

Director since 1996

Mr. O’Brien is the retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Allmerica Financial Corporation (now The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.), an insurance and diversified financial services company, holding those positions from 1995 to 2002. Mr. O’Brien previously held executive positions at Fidelity Investments, an asset management firm, including Group Managing Director of FMR Corporation, Chairman of Institutional Services Company, and Chairman of Brokerage Services, Inc. Mr. O’Brien serves as our Lead Director.

Mr. O’Brien is also a director of Cabot Corporation, a director of LKQ Corporation, and a director of a family of 86 registered mutual funds managed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment management advisory firm.

Mr. O’Brien has substantial executive experience with two financial services businesses, giving him expertise including general management and oversight with respect to strategy, financial planning, insurance, operations, finance, and capital structure.

Willow B. Shire, 70

Director since 1995

Ms. Shire was an executive consultant with Orchard Consulting Group from 1994 to January 2015, specializing in leadership development and strategic problem solving. Previously, she was Chairperson for the Computer Systems Public Policy Project within the National Academy of Science. She also held various positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer hardware manufacturer, for 18 years, including Vice President and Officer, Health Industries Business Unit.

Through her consulting experience and prior business experience, Ms. Shire brings expertise in leadership development, talent assessment, change management, human resources and development practices, cultural assessment, and strategic problem solving.

18    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

The following table shows, as of April 14, 2015,9, 2018, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each director,director/ director nominee and executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group.group:

 

 

Name

Number of Shares(1)Shares

 

 

Zein Abdalla

14,075

20,985

 

José B. Alvarez

38,225

44,074

 

Alan M. Bennett

41,525

49,902

 Bernard Cammarata(2)

2,682,474

David T. Ching

41,144

44,869

 

Scott Goldenberg

115,474

50,345

 

Ernie Herrman

711,325

312,246

 

Michael F. Hines

49,761

58,235

 

Amy B. Lane

55,778

55,894

 

Michael MacMillan

64,259

88,667

 

Carol Meyrowitz

740,344

231,143

 

Jackwyn L. Nemerov

3,475

John F. O’Brien

110,105

119,020

 

Richard Sherr

145,000

40,000

 

Willow B. Shire

70,374

78,853

 William H. Swanson

4,464

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17(16 Persons)(3)

 5,124,736

1,384,195

The total number of shares beneficially owned by each individual and by the group above constitutes, in each case, less than 1% of the outstanding shares. Reflectsshares of TJX. The amounts above reflect sole voting and investment power except as indicatednoted below. The shares listed in footnotes below.the table above include:

 

(1)Shares listed:

Include vestedVested deferred shares (and(including estimated deferred shares for accumulated dividends) held by the following directors: Mr. Abdalla 4,951;8,539; Mr. Alvarez 36,262;41,210; Mr. Bennett 36,262;44,803; Mr. Ching 23,730;28,133; Mr. Hines 38,498;47,136; Ms. Lane 33,220;38,577; Ms. Nemerov 2,176; Mr. O’Brien 51,133;56,726; Ms. Shire 52,747; Mr. Swanson 38259,727; and all directors and executive officers as a group 277,185. Shares include 1,263 estimated327,027.

1,099 deferred shares (and(including estimated deferred shares for accumulated dividends) that are scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 14, 20159, 2018 held by each of Mr. Abdalla, Mr. Alvarez, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Ching, Mr. Hines, Ms. Lane, Mr. O’Brien, Ms. Shire; 382 held by Mr. Swansonnon-executive director; and 10,4869,891 held by all directors and executive officers as a group.

 

Include11,347 shares of common stock over which Mr. Abdalla and his spouse share voting and dispositive power.

Shares of common stock that the following persons had the right to acquire on April 14, 20159, 2018 or within 60 days thereafter through the exercise of options: Mr. Goldenberg 16,802;19,501; Mr. Herrman 191,325; Ms. Lane 6,500;182,246; Mr. MacMillan 8,404;27,487; Ms. Meyrowitz 297,298;155,066; and all directors and executive officers as a group 565,141.506,630.

Include performance-basedPerformance-based restricted shares that were subject to forfeiture restrictions as of April 14, 2015:9, 2018: Mr. Goldenberg 94,000;30,000; Mr. Herrman 520,000; Mr. MacMillan 40,000; Ms. Meyrowitz 250,000;130,000; Mr. Sherr 145,000;40,000; and all directors and executive officers as a group 1,216,000. 220,000.

40,000 performance-based deferred shares for Mr. MacMillan and 50,000 for all directors and executive officers as a group scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 9, 2018.

Shares listed do not include, unvested performance-based deferred stock awardsif not scheduled to vest within 60 days of April 14, 2015.

9, 2018, unvested performance-based deferred share awards, performance share unit awards, or restricted stock unit awards.

 

(2)Includes 116,694 shares owned by a charitable foundation of which Mr. Cammarata is a trustee and 416,387 shares held in family trusts of which Mr. Cammarata is a trustee. Does not include 3,216 shares owned by Mr. Cammarata’s spouse as to which Mr. Cammarata disclaims beneficial ownership.

2018 Proxy Statement    19


LOGO

 

(3)Includes 16,000 shares owned jointly and over which an executive officer and spouse share voting and dispositive power.

The following table shows, as of April 14, 2015,9, 2018, each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% or more of our outstanding common stock:

 

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Number of SharesPercentage of Class Outstanding

FMR LLC(1)

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

58,061,8248.4%

The Vanguard Group(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

40,793,8645.9%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

40 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

35,732,4755.2%

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares  

 

Percentage of

Class

Outstanding

 

 

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(1)

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

 

 

 

 

48,569,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.7

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(2)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

 

 

 

 

45,354,058

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.2

 

 

(1)Amounts above based on ownership of FMR LLC at December 31, 2014 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2015, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 4,887,711 of the shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 58,061,824 of the shares.

(2)Amounts above based on ownership of The Vanguard Group, at December 31, 2014 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2015, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 1,196,300 of the shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 39,660,054 shares and shared dispositive power over 1,133,810 shares.

(3)Amounts above based on ownership of BlackRock, Inc., and certain subsidiaries at December 31, 20142017 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2015,2018, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 29,500,938914,106 of the shares, shared voting power with respect to 163,971 of the shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 47,518,514 of the shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,051,154 of the shares.

(2)Amounts based on ownership of BlackRock, Inc. and certain subsidiaries at December 31, 2017 as indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 23, 2018, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 37,718,738 of the shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 35,732,47545,354,058 of the shares.

Section

SECTION 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our common stock with the SEC and the NYSE. To facilitate compliance, we have undertaken the responsibility to prepare and file these reports on behalf of our officers and directors. Based on our records and other information, all reports for fiscal 2018 were timely filed, other than a delay in filing a Form 4 to report transfersreporting the transfer of shares for equivalent valueheld by Mr. Abdalla from direct to Mr. Cammarata from three family trusts and to report the surrender of shares toindirect shared ownership.

20    The TJX for tax withholding upon vesting of Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based restricted stock award in March 2015.Companies, Inc.


LOGO

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our CD&A reviews the objectives and elements of TJX’s executive compensation program, describes the related processes of our Executive Compensation DiscussionCommittee (ECC), and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section provides details ofdiscusses the fiscal 2018 compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), listed below. It also explains the actions our ECC took in response to the shareholder feedback we received during our extensive shareholder outreach on executive compensation during fiscal 2015 for our fiscal 2015 named executive officers: Carol Meyrowitz, Chief Executive Officer; Ernie Herrman, President; Michael MacMillan, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President; Richard Sherr, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President; and Scott Goldenberg, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.

This section is organized into the following parts:

> Executive Summary: Performance and Program Highlights

> Overview of Process: How Compensation Decisions Are Made

> Compensation Program Elements

> Related Policies and Considerations

> Executive Summary: Performance and Program Highlights

TJX is the leading off-price apparel and home fashions retailer in the United States and worldwide. Our management has led very strong performance at TJX through weak and strong economies. We believe our compensation program is critical to motivating our management to achieve our business goals. We also believe that a key component to our success is maintaining the ability to develop new and existing talent to execute our business model and long-term, global strategy. Our overall compensation philosophy is to create a balanced program to attract and retain top talent, motivate executives to achieve our business objectives, reward performance, and maintain shareholder-friendly pay practices that help align the interest of our Associates and shareholders.

Fiscal 2015 was a successful year for TJX, reflecting our management’s strong execution of our business model.2018.

 

TJX Market Capitalization FY11 - FY15  NEO  Title

Ernie Herrman

Chief Executive Officer and President

Scott Goldenberg

Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Carol Meyrowitz

Executive Chairman

Michael MacMillan

Senior Executive Vice President, Group President

Richard Sherr

Senior Executive Vice President, Group President

WHERE WE ARE TODAY

TJX is the leading internationaloff-price apparel and home fashions retailer. We have a long, successful track record of strong financial performance, including 22 consecutive years of annual comparable store sale increases, and an executive team with deep experience inoff-price retailing. Having a highly-engaged senior leadership team with the ability to execute our distinctive and flexible retail business model has always been critical to our business. Accordingly, our executive compensation program is designed to drive long-term profitable and sustainable growth, foster management stability, and support our leadership succession plans.

Fiscal 2018 Shareholder Outreach Initiative

We have followed a consistent approach to the design of our executive compensation program for many years. The history of our say-on-pay results before 2017 demonstrated strong shareholder support for our program over several years, with support averaging over 95% between 2011 and 2016. But in response to the lower level of support for our 2017 say-on-pay vote, the ECC led an extensive shareholder outreach initiative during fiscal 2018. This outreach focused on better understanding the concerns and perspectives of our shareholders, including those who did not support our say-on-pay vote in 2017. The ECC then made design changes to our fiscal 2019 program that respond to the shareholder feedback we received.

 

LOGO

Fiscal 2015

$29.1 B

Net Sales2018 Executive Compensation Shareholder Outreach At-A-Glance (May 2017 - April 2018)

 

LOGO

 Entire process overseen by our ECC

 

16%

Total Stockholder Return

 Reached out to shareholders representing over 50% of shares outstanding, including many who voted againstsay-on-pay

 

$45.2 B

Market Cap

 Held discussions with shareholders representing over 37% of shares outstanding and with proxy advisory firms

 

176 / 3,395

Net New Stores/Total Stores

 Included representatives from HR, legal, and investor relations; several discussions led by our ECC Chairman

 Reported detailed feedback from each discussion to the ECC for its consideration

This executive compensation outreach initiative was in addition to our regular, ongoing shareholder engagement.

2018 Proxy Statement    21


LOGO

What We reached $29.1 billion in net sales, 6% more than last year.Heard and How We addedResponded

We heard a netrange of 176 new stores indifferent perspectives on our executive compensation program from shareholders during our fiscal 2015, continuing2018 outreach, all of which were considered by the ECC.

We received considerable positive feedback about the overall program and support for our growth across our geographies. Our total stockholder return was 16% for fiscal 2015 on top of 28% for the year before. Our market capitalization continued to grow, from $40.4 billion in fiscal 2014 to $45.2 billion at the end of fiscal 2015.

Our three- and five-year compound annual growth rate for shareholder return of 26% and 30%, respectively, again exceeded the performance of the general market (S&P 500) and that of our compensation peer group discussed in this proxy statement. In the same periods, our adjusted earnings per share growth of 17% surpassed that of our peer group.

Total Stockholder Return Growth RatesAdjusted EPS Growth Rates*

LOGO

LOGO

Our CEO’s compensation continued to be alignedmanagement team, consistent with our strong performance.priorsay-on-pay results. Additionally, many of our larger shareholders agreed with the ECC on the importance of having a stable senior leadership team with the knowledge and expertise to execute our distinctiveoff-price business model successfully over the long-term.

LOGO

Our plan-basedHowever, we also heard some common concerns about specific aspects of our program’s design, discussed below, as well as comments cautioning us against overcomplicating our program or introducing too many changes. Based on this feedback, the ECC examined ways to improve our compensation for fiscal 2015 reflectsprogram without compromising its strengths, including its focus on our strong performance.core business goals, promoting stability, and driving performance, as well as its overall emphasis on long-term performance incentives. As a result, we made some important modifications to our program, summarized below, and updated our disclosure in several key areas.

 

What We Heard

How We Responded

Annual Cash Incentive Plan

Single Metric

 

119.62%We have a long-standing practice of usingpre-tax income as the only type of performance metric in our incentive plans. Shareholders indicated they generally prefer to see a mix of incentive plan metrics that balance growth, profitability, and returns.

Multiple Metrics

 

Payout for above target

corporate performance for FY15

Long Term Cash Incentive PlanOur new incentive program includes a balance of growth, profitability, and return metrics, including measures based on:

 

125.49%•  Earnings per share (EPS) growth

•  Return on invested capital (ROIC)

•  Pre-tax income

•  Sales

 

Payout

Performance Vesting for above target

performance for FY13- FY15 cycle

Performance-BasedLong-Term Stock Awards

 

üHistorically, we have used a single long-term stock award that was 100% performance-based, but that vested in full at a threshold level of performance below target. Shareholders expressed some concerns about the rigor of this approach to performance vesting.

New Design for Long-Term Stock Awards

 

Performance conditionsOur new long-term performance share units (PSUs) increase the overall rigor of the program and will vest in full only if performance goals are achieved at target, with upside or downside for performance above or below target—providing for more performance sensitivity and a wider range of potential pay outcomes.

satisfied for periods ending in FY15

Fiscal 2017 Annual Incentive Target

Shareholders expressed some concerns about our fiscal 2017 annual incentive dollar target being set below prior year results.

New Incentive Targets

Our fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019 annual incentive targets were set higher than prior year targets and prior year actual results. We have also enhanced our disclosure on how we set goals.

In making these changes, the ECC focused on designing the new program in a way that reflects shareholder concerns and strengthens our ability to drive the execution of ouroff-price business model over the long term, support sustained growth, and continue decades of proven success in all types of business and retail environments.

22    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

 

 

*Notes on Charts:

1. Adjusted earnings per share (EPS)Fiscal 2019 Executive Compensation Program

The key components of TJX and several of the peer group members exclude from diluted EPS from continuing operations computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) the positive and negative effects of items that affect comparability between periods. Peer group average includes only those companies with positive adjusted EPS in the most recent fiscal year or comparable period. Our fiscal 2011 adjusted EPS of $1.75 does not include the negative impact of $0.11 per share from operating losses and closing costs of A.J. Wright stores and $0.01 per share benefit for a reduction for Computer Intrusion related costs from GAAP EPS of $1.65. Our fiscal 2012 adjusted EPS of $1.99 excludes the negative impact of $0.06 per share from the A.J. Wright consolidation from GAAP EPS of $1.93. Our fiscal 2013 adjusted EPS of $2.47 excludes an estimated $0.08 per share benefit from the 53rd week from GAAP EPS of $2.55. Our fiscal 2014 adjusted EPS of $2.83 excludes an $0.11 per share tax benefit from GAAP EPS of $2.94. Our fiscal 2015 adjusted EPS of $3.16 excludes the impact of a second quarter debt extinguishment charge of $.01 per share from GAAP EPS of $3.15.

2. In the CEO Pay for Performance chart, Total Compensation for our CEO for each fiscal year consists ofexecutive compensation program continue to be base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term incentives, both cash incentives (MIP and LRPIP) with performance periods ending in that fiscal year, stock options valued at grant date and performance-based stock awards valued at grant date and allocated to the year of the related performance and service (seeReporting of Performance-Based Stock Awards, below). Reconciliations of adjusted EPS are included in the note above. Information reflected in this chart differs from, and is not a substitute for, the information presented in the Summary Compensation Table on page 30 of this proxy statement.

3. In the Fiscal 2015 Compensation Elements chart on page 18, Other NEO Average includes all named executive officers other than the CEO. Target compensation for both the CEO and other NEOs consists of annual salary, target cash incentive awards with performance periods ending in fiscal 2015 (fiscal 2015 MIP and fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP), performance-based stock awards with performance periods ending in fiscal 2015 (valued at grant date fair value) and fiscal 2015 option awards (valued at grant date fair value).

TJX Compensation Program Highlights

Our compensation program emphasizes variable, performance-based compensation. These elements constituted aequity. The most significant portion of total target compensation for our named executive officers in fiscal 2015, as shown below.

Fiscal 2015 Compensation Elements*

LOGO

*SeeNotes on Charts on page 17 for more information.

Key Principles

Our program is designedNEOs continues to be balanced, transparent and aligned with our core business goals.

Our program is heavily weighted to at-risklong-term performance-based incentive compensation with payout based on performance.
compensation.

We seek to maintain shareholder-friendly pay practices and to align the interestThe following summarizes what’s new for fiscal 2019. The key features of our Associatesnew program—including the new mix of metrics and shareholders.

Key Program Elementsnew design for our long-term incentives—were reviewed as part of our outreach process, and Objectivesshareholders generally expressed support for these overall design changes during our fiscal 2018 outreach.

NEW MIX OF PERFORMANCE METRICS

The table below describesECC conducted anin-depth review of various possible performance metrics in light of the key elements ofshareholder preferences we heard and our compensationbusiness strategy. After careful consideration, the ECC determined that the fiscal 2019 program for our named executive officers. In addition toNEOs will include the more specific objectives summarized below, all elements offollowing performance metrics in our program are intended to help us attract and retain talented individuals.incentive plans:

 

 

ElementPerformance Metric

 

  

 

ObjectivesWhy It’s Included

 

  

 

BalanceHow It Will Be Used

 

 
SalaryPre-Tax Income  

 

•  Provide a base levelReflects divisional profitability, including bothtop-line performance and effective management of compensation that reflects individual responsibilities.expenses

 

•  Recognize individual performanceHighly relevant to our business, well understood, and achievement.a key driver for all TJX management

•  Primary, but not sole, metric in our annual MIP program, weighted at 80%

•  Three-year cumulative metric in our long-term cash program (LRPIP)

New

Total Sales

•  Demonstratestop-line growth

•  Highly visible and easy to understand

•  Secondary measure in our MIP program, weighted at 20%

•  Limited upside from sales; MIP payout formula restricts sales impact to maintain overall emphasis on profitability

New

EPS Growth

•  Maintains critical focus on profitable growth

•  Reinforces attention to capital discipline and corporate-level results

•  Important measure internally and externally

•  Primary measure in our new long-term PSU program

•  Excludes the impact of certain unplanned items, such as unbudgeted buybacks and unanticipated changes in corporate tax rates

New

ROIC

•  Reinforces attention to capital investments and generating appropriate returns

 

 

  FixedShorter-
term
Cash

Annual Cash

Incentives (MIP)

•  Incentivize performance to reach or exceedSecondary measure in our short-term, annual financial objectives, primarily within each business division. Encourage engagement and teamwork within division.new long-term PSU program

 

•  Reward achievement of financial goals for the current fiscal year, on a divisional or company-wide basis.Used as downward-only modifier

 

VariableShorter-
term
Cash

Long-Term Cash

Incentives (LRPIP)

•      Incentivize performance to reach or exceed our longer term financial objectives across the Company. Foster teamwork across divisions.

•      Reward company-wide achievement of multi-year financial goals (typically over three fiscal years).

•      Provide longer-term retention incentives.

VariableLonger-
term
Cash

Equity Incentives

(Options and

Performance-Based

Stock Awards)

•      Reward corporate performance reflected in stock performance.

•      Provide longer-term retention incentives.

Variable

Longer-
term

Equity

2018 Proxy Statement    23

In addition, we provide health and welfare, deferred compensation and retirement benefits, as well as limited perquisites, to further support our competitive position and promote retention. We also provide relocation-related benefits, including tax equalization, to facilitate deployment of our Associates in global service.


LOGO

 

What We Do
Pay for PerformanceüOur short- and long-term cash incentive compensation is tied directly to achievement of objective, Board-approved performance metrics based on core business goals.
Award LimitsüIncentive plan payouts for our named executive officers can be decreased but not increased and are subject to limits on maximum payout.
Performance-Based AwardsüAll of our stock awards for named executive officers have performance-based vesting conditions; none are solely time-based.
Stock Ownership GuidelinesüWe have stock ownership guidelines of 5x base salary for our CEO, 3x base salary for other executive officers and 5x annual retainer for non-employee directors.
Clawback PolicyüWe have a policy for recovery of incentive compensation that applies to all executive officers.
Independent Compensation ConsultantüOur Executive Compensation Committee (ECC) directly engages an independent compensation consultant. The ECC’s consultant does not provide other services to management.
Annual Compensation Risk AssessmentüWe conduct a risk assessment of our compensation programs on an annual basis.
Annual Say-on-PayüOur Board elected to have our executive compensation program considered by shareholders annually through our say-on-pay vote (see Proposal 3). We have received more than 97% approval each year we have presented it to our shareholders.

NEW LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS (PSUs)

Starting in fiscal 2019, NEOs will be eligible to receive new long-term equity award grants in the form of PSUs. PSUs will make up the largest portion of their target long-term incentives. PSUs granted in fiscal 2019 will be earned based on the achievement of challenging EPS compound annual growth rate (CAGR) goals measured at the end of a three-year performance cycle (fiscal 2019-2021). The new PSUs will also be subject to a downward ROIC modifier, which means that if the company does not achieve its ROIC goals, award payouts will be adjusted downward by 20%.

 

Step 1

Step 2
Level of EPS
Performance1
Payout as a
Percentage of Target2
ROIC
Performance Modifier

Below Threshold

<87% of target

0%

Below

Target Range:

Reduce by 20%

Threshold

87% of target

25%

Target

100%

100%

At or Above

Target Range:

No Modification

Maximum

>130% of target

200%

Performance level expressed as a percent of target based on EPS at the end of the fiscal 2019-2021 performance period, which corresponds to the target EPS CAGR goal for the period.
2Before ROIC modifier. Payout levels based on EPS performance will be interpolated on a straight-line basis for performance between threshold and target or between target and maximum.

The EPS growth target goal for fiscal 2019-2021 is aligned with our long range business plan, with the target reflecting meaningful growth over the three-year period. The threshold level reflects the minimal level of growth during the three-year period required for any payout, and the maximum level is intended to be a significant stretch goal for the period. The ROIC modifier is intended to ensure that a full payout based on EPS results will be made only if we also generate meaningful returns over the three-year period.

Compared to the design of our previous performance-based stock awards (PBSAs), which were intended to serve as vehicles for stability and retention and not solely as performance incentives, the new PSU design adds more performance sensitivity and increases the overall rigor of the program. The number of PSUs eligible to vest will be reduced for performance below target, and a higher threshold level of performance is required for any of the PSUs to vest, as compared to our prior PBSAs (as illustrated below).

LOGO

*Performance level for PSUs expressed as a percent of target based on EPS at the end of the fiscal 2019-2021 performance period, which corresponds to the target EPS CAGR goal for the period.

24    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

2019 TARGET TOTAL COMPENSATION PAY MIX

Key elements of our fiscal 2019 target compensation mix for our NEOs are as follows:

Consistent with shareholder feedback and our historical practice, long-term incentives continue to represent the largest percentage of target total compensation, and the new PSU awards will make up the greatest portion of target total compensation for fiscal 2019.

Performance-based incentives, including the target value of PSUs and LRPIP, will comprise 80% of the total target long-term incentive value.

To maintain an appropriate degree of stability within the program and support our management continuity, which is a longstanding, key component of our leadership strategy, starting in fiscal 2019 the mix of long-term incentives will also include restricted stock units (RSUs). These RSUs will be limited to 20% of the total target long-term incentive value and will generally be scheduled to vest three years from the grant date.

Stock option grants, which were a relatively small portion of target total compensation under the previous compensation program, have been eliminated to simplify the program.

While the mix of our long-term incentive vehicles has changed, the total target grant value of our fiscal 2019 long-term incentives for our CEO and Executive Chairman has not increased.

The charts below show the mix of fiscal 2019 target total compensation for our CEO and our other NEOs.

LOGOLOGO

2018 Proxy Statement    25


LOGO

Continued Focus on Good Compensation Governance

Our compensation governance practices over the past several years, highlighted in the table below, reflect the effective oversight of the ECC:

What We Do and What We Don’t Do

  ✓  Pay for performance, directly tying incentive compensation to the achievement of objective performance metrics
  ✓   What We Don’t DoAward limits on maximum plan payouts
  ✓  Emphasis on long-term opportunities for equity and cash incentives
  ✓  Stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers andnon-employee directors
  ✓  Clawback policy applicable to our executive officers
  ✓  Independent compensation consultant engaged by and reporting directly to our ECC
  ✓  Annual compensation risk assessment
  ✓  Annual shareholdersay-on-pay vote
  LOGO    

Golden Parachute Tax

Gross-ups

×We do not provideNo change of control excise tax gross-ups.gross-ups

  LOGO   

No single-trigger severance benefits upon a change of control
  LOGO    Single-Trigger Severance following ChangeNo automatic full acceleration of Control×Severance benefits are payable to our named executive officers followingequity awards upon a change of control, only upon involuntary termination of employment or termination by the executive for “good reason.”awards granted since September 2015
  LOGO   No hedging or pledging of company stock by our executive officers
  LOGO    Hedging or Pledging of Company Stock×Our policies prohibit our executives from hedging or pledging TJX securities.No dividends on unearned stock awards
  LOGO   No repricing or exchange of underwater stock options without shareholder approval

Pay Dividends on Unearned Awards×Dividends or dividend equivalent payments on performance-based stock awards to our executive officers are deferred until the underlying award vests.
Repricing or Exchange of Underwater Stock Options×

Our Stock Incentive Plan (SIP) prohibits any amendment providing for the payment or provision of other consideration on termination or cancellation of any underwater stock option without stockholder approval.

Stockholder ResponseFOCUS ON GOAL-SETTING

Our stockholders have shown strong approvalEach year, the ECC sets objective business performance targets and the amounts payable at different levels of performance under each of our executive compensation program. Holdersincentive plans. These goals are part of more than 97%our strategic planning process, and are derived from our Board-approved annual and multi-year business plans. Our incentive plan targets are generally set at levels that align with the financial guidance we provide to investors. At the time the goals are established, the ECC considers a variety of qualitative and quantitative factors, including:

estimated long-term trends in sales, comparable store sales, profitability, and earnings;

maturity of our various businesses;

strategic investments to support our growth;

external influences (such as market competition, currency volatility, and wage pressures);

balance of potential business risks, performance, and rewards;

historical performance against targets and relative to peers and the market; and

degree of difficulty in achieving proposed levels of performance.

Historically, this process has led to year-over-year increases in our annual corporate MIP targets over the past five years, demonstrating the rigor and consistent growth in these programs over time.

As part of the shares voting ongoal-setting process, at the proposal have approved our advisory “say-on-pay” proposal each year since 2011 when we first asked stockholders to vote on an advisory say-on-pay proposal.time the goals are established the ECC also establishes definitions of the applicable financial metrics (including, for example, planned exchange rates for foreign currency translation) and automatic adjustments (including, for example, for unplanned changes in accounting standards, acquisitions, or dispositions) that would apply during the performance period. The ECC believes thatuses these definitions and adjustments to better align our incentive plans with how we evaluate our business operations and trends and, in some cases, to allow certain strategic decisions to be made in the long-term interests of TJX without being influenced by incentive plan results. The effect of these items on our incentive plan results reflect our stockholders’ supportis included in the details below. The ECC has not made any discretionary increases to incentive plan payouts for our approach to executive compensation, including the focus on incentive components linked to our performance, and has been mindful of this stockholder support when acting on compensation matters.

NEOs in recent years.

> Overview of Process: How Compensation Decisions Are Made26    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS

THE ROLE OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The ECC, an independenta committee of our Board of Directors is responsible forcomposed entirely of independent directors, oversees the compensation design and for approving compensation forof our executive officers. The ECC has usedofficers, including the same principle of compensation design for many years: establish a program of total compensation competitive with our peers, heavily weighted toward objective, performance-based incentives that focus on execution and reward achievement of our core business goals.NEOs. In determining the overall level of executive compensation and establishing the design and mix of its specific elements, the ECC follows a thoughtful and deliberate process and considers various quantitative and qualitative factors, such as company and divisional performance, as:

individual executive performance and responsibilities

market data and peer practices its experience with existing compensation programs, results of our advisory votes on executive compensation, the limitation on income tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)), recruitment, retention and

succession planning contractual obligations, promotions,and organizational changes relocations

internal consistency with our broad-based practices and transitional roles.programs
company and divisional performance

our business culture and core values

shareholder feedback, including oursay-on-pay vote

employment terms and contractual negotiations

risk mitigation strategies; balance of potential risks and rewards

The ECC has an annual cycle ofapproaches executive compensation actionsas part of the overall strategic framework for total rewards at TJX. This framework applies to all TJX associates and also acts to address any special actionsreflects our global total rewards principles, which include sharing in connection with management changes; employment agreements; retirement plans, deferred compensationthe success of the company, encouraging teamwork and other benefits;collaboration across a diverse workforce, and other ECC charter responsibilities. The ECC typically reviewsbeing fair and approves elements of compensation for our named executive officers on the annual schedule below:equitable.

By the beginning of the fiscal year

•    Review and approve peer group for new fiscal year

By the end of the first fiscal quarter

•    Establish award opportunities and goals for new MIP and LRPIP performance periods

•    Grant performance-based stock awards

•    Approve salary adjustments

In September

•    Grant stock options

After the fiscal year end

•    Certify performance results for completed performance cycles (for MIP, LRPIP and performance-based stock awards)

As discussed further below, theThe ECC consults with and reviews data from an independent compensation consultant, discussed further below, to assess the overall competitiveness of our executives’ individualNEOs’ compensation and our executive compensation program overall and to determine the appropriate levels and the mix of individual compensation components.

RoleIn addition to any special actions the ECC may take throughout the year in connection with its other charter responsibilities, the ECC typically reviews and approves elements of Executivesour NEOs’ compensation using the following general process:

LOGO

THE ROLE OF EXECUTIVES

Our executive officers play a limited role in determining executive compensation. Our CEO provides an annual self-assessment to the Corporate Governance Committee and makes recommendations to the ECC regarding compensation of our other named executive officers. These recommendations are based on annual performance reviews completed by the executive to whom each named executive officer directly reports. The ECC also receives a performance evaluation of our CEO, including her achievement of performance objectives set by the Corporate Governance Committee, which does not make compensation recommendations. The ECC considers these performance reviews and recommendations, among other factors, in establishing base salaries, cash incentive opportunities and equity grants forinvites our executive officers. More generally, executive officers to attend portions of its meetings, and they participate in our strategic planning process, discuss business and organizational strategies with the Board, and recommend to the Board, for its review and approval, the annual and multi-year business plans for TJX and itsour divisions. These Board-approved plans areform the basis for the performance targets of our short- and long-term incentive performanceplans, and those targets and the stock award performance criteria, which are approved by the ECC. The ECC regularly meetsalso receives individual performance evaluations, based in part on executive session (withoutself-assessments, of our management directors present)CEO and invitesExecutive Chairman from the Corporate Governance Committee (which does not make executive officerscompensation recommendations). For each of our other NEOs, the CEO makes compensation recommendations to attend other portionsthe ECC based in part on the individual annual performance evaluations of its meetings.

these executives. These evaluations from the Corporate Governance Committee and the CEO take into account the NEO’s individual responsibilities, performance, and

Compensation Consultants

2018 Proxy Statement    27


LOGO

support of TJX’s cultural values. The ECC hasconsiders these executives’ performance evaluations and the authority, without Board or management approval, to retain and terminateCEO’s recommendations, among other factors, in establishing compensation consultants and advisors and to determine their fees and terms of engagement. for our NEOs.

THE ROLE OF COMPENSATION CONSULTANTS

The ECC engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC or PM&P,(Pearl Meyer) to serve as the independent compensation consultant to the ECC for fiscal 2015. PM&P2018. Pearl Meyer attended all of the ECC’s meetings during the fiscal year and was available to the ECC on an ongoing basis throughout the year. Pearl Meyer provided industry, peer, and market data and advised the ECC on a variety of matters, including the design and competitive positioning of key compensation elements (base salary, annual bonus, and long-term cash and equity incentives) for our named executive officersNEOs and other senior management,management; short-term and long-term relationships between NEO pay and corporate performance relative to our peers; the establishment and evaluation of a compensation peer group,group; the design and competitive positioning of our new compensation program for fiscal 2019; employment agreement terms,terms; aggregate equity usage and program review, practicesusage; and updates on practices, trends, and regulatory developments.developments as well as on otherpay-related matters. The ECC usesused this information to determineand advice from Pearl Meyer as a reference in making its executive compensation decisions and determinations about the design, overall level and appropriate mix of fixed and variable compensation, appropriate plan metrics, short-termgoals and long-term incentive opportunitiesformulas, and cash and equity-based opportunities and to determine individual compensation components, including benefits and perquisites. PM&P

Pearl Meyer did not perform any services for TJX other than work for or requested by the ECC and for the Corporate Governance Committee with respect to compensation of directors. PM&Pon director compensation. Pearl Meyer reported directly to the ECC, which determined the scope of PM&P’sPearl Meyer’s engagement and its fees.

The ECC regularly reviews the services provided to the ECC by outside consultants and believes that PM&P is independent in providing executive compensation consulting services.consultants. During fiscal 2015,2018, the ECC reviewed its existing relationship with PM&P,Pearl Meyer, including potential conflicts of interest, and determined that PM&P’sPearl Meyer’s work for the ECC did not raise any conflicts of interest and that PM&PPearl Meyer continued to be an independent advisor to the ECC.

During fiscal 2015, our management engaged The Hay Group as a compensation consultant to review our broader-based equity and cash incentive programs for eligible Associates, including our named executive officers. The Hay Group conducted its analysis of the broader programs based on interviews with management and ECC members and peer and market data. After the ECC considered factors relevant to the independence of The Hay Group and determined that its work did not raise any conflict of interest, The Hay Group presented its findings to the ECC as a supplement to the analysis and advice from PM&P.THE ROLE OF OUR PEER GROUP

Peer Group

As described above, theThe ECC uses data from a peer group to provide context forinform its compensation decision-making for our named executive officers.NEOs. The ECC regularlyannually assesses this peer group and considers revisions. Before the start of fiscal 2015, advised by PM&P, the ECC reviewed the composition of itsthis peer group. During fiscal 2017, the ECC considered what would be an appropriate peer group to be considered in establishingevaluate fiscal 2018 compensation practices and evaluating fiscal 2015 compensation for our named executive officers andpay levels. After consultation with Pearl Meyer, the ECC determined that the following group of 1916 large, publicly traded consumer-oriented companies listed below would be appropriate:appropriate to use for fiscal 2018.

FY 18 Peer Companies

 

Fiscal 2015 Peer Group
    Best Buy 
Amazon.com, Inc.L BrandsKimberly-Clark CorporationNikeRoss Stores Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.Kohl’s CorporationStaples, Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.L Brands, Inc.Starbucks Corporation
eBay, Inc.Lowe’s Companies, Inc.Target Corporation
The Gap, Inc.Macy’s, Inc.Walgreen Co.
Home Depot, Inc.Nike, Inc.YUM! Brands, Inc.
    Gap

Lowe’s

NordstromStarbucks
    Kimberly-ClarkMacy’sPepsiCoTarget
    Kohl’sMcDonaldsProcter & GambleThe Home Depot

FY 18 Peer Company Comparison

 

Peer Data

 

 

 

    Revenue ($B)*    

 

 

 

    Market Cap ($B)*    

 

Median

   $  25.5  $40.7

TJX

   $  32.7  $49.0

TJX Percentile Rank

   59th   56th
*Revenue is trailing four quarters at the end of 2016. Market cap is as of December 30, 2016. 

28    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

 

The ECC determined thatestablished the above group was an appropriatefiscal 2018 peer group for TJX for fiscal 2015 based on criteria that includedafter taking into account TJX’s growth and continued global focus, coupled with challenges facing smaller peers in the following:domestic retail industry. Criteria used in constructing the peer group included:

 

industry similarity, targeting retail companies and also considering consumer product companies that met complexity criteria;

revenues ranging from approximatelyone-third to three times our annual revenue (generally between approximately $9 billion and $80 billion at the time of the analysis);revenue;

 

market capitalization ranging from approximatelyone-fourth to four times our market capitalization (generally between approximately $10 billion and $160 billion at the time of the analysis);capitalization;

 

comparability of business model, including levels of operational complexity, reflected by factors such as geographic span,significant global operations, brand and/or product line diversity, e-commerce strategy, businessmultiple segments, and other strategic and operational factors that contribute to business complexity;e-commerce strategy; and

 

considerations of financial performance metrics, including operating and market performance.

Compared to our fiscal 2017 peer group, the fiscal 2018 peer group removed five companies that in the judgment of the ECC no longer fit our size and business focus criteria: Amazon.com, Inc.; Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.; eBay, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; and YUM! Brands, Inc. The ECC considered allalso added three companies that it determined are more comparable in size, scale, and global focus: McDonald’s Corporation; PepsiCo, Inc.; and The Procter & Gamble Company. As shown in the table above, TJX was above the median of these criteria and constructed the fiscal 20152018 peer group to reflect a level of business complexityin both revenue and performance more similar to TJX’s (which resulted in removing J.C. Penney and adding eBay, Inc. and Walgreens as compared to the fiscal 2014 peer group).market cap.

Although theThe ECC uses peer group data to provideinform the competitiveness of compensation and program design and believes that this data provides important context for its own determinations, itcompensation decisions. At the same time, the ECC recognizes that ouroff-price retail business model, in combination with our size and global focus, is distinct from other companies and the ECC does not rely on strict benchmarking or target compensation or any element of NEO compensation for our named executive officers by reference to any specified level atof compensation within the peer group. The ECC has also supplemented peer group data from time to time with additional case studies and market data to provide further context for its compensation decisions.

> Compensation Program ElementsCONSIDERATIONS FOR EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN COMPENSATION

CompensationMs. Meyrowitz assumed the role of Executive Chairman at the start of fiscal 2017 and is an active and integral member of the executive management team in addition to serving as Chairman of the Board. Our Board believes strongly that Ms. Meyrowitz, who has wide ranging,in-depth knowledge of our business and the retail industry overall, continues to play a critical role as an executive at TJX in addition to providing effective leadership to the Board. In her role as Executive Chairman, she serves as a key resource in the areas of merchandising, marketing, and internal training, and provides support to our CEO, CFO, and other members of senior management, with an emphasis on strategic initiatives and long-term company strategy.

The ECC recognizes that the role of executive chairman varies across companies. In establishing compensation for Ms. Meyrowitz, the ECC, advised by Pearl Meyer, evaluated other Fortune 200 companies with executive chairman positions and took into account the degree of active involvement that Ms. Meyrowitz would have as part of the management team at TJX relative to other executive chairman roles that may be more limited or transitional in nature.

2018 Proxy Statement    29


LOGO

FISCAL 2018 REVIEW

During fiscal 2018, we solidly executed our business plan and growth strategies, increasing comparable store sales, driven by customer traffic, and growing our store base globally while maintaining focus on driving profitable sales, reinvesting in the business, managing expenses, and returning value to shareholders. These and other events during the year contributed to our annual incentive plan results, as described below. At the beginning of fiscal 2019, we announced plans to continue our growth and reinvestment initiatives, including driving comparable store sales and customer traffic gains, increasing ourlong-term store growth potential for some of our chains and, in light of U.S. tax law changes, planning a more substantial share buyback program and increase to our quarterly dividends and additional investments in our Associates and our communities.

FISCAL 2018 BUSINESS REVIEW

(53 weeks)

Financial Results/

Business Execution

Shareholder 
Value Creation
Business/Strategic
Results

•  Over $35 billion net sales, an increase of 8% over fiscal 2017

•  Comparable store sales1 increased 2% over a strong 5% in fiscal 2017

•  Surpassed $5 billion in net sales at HomeGoods, our U.S. home division

•  7.4% total shareholder return

•  Returned $2.4 billion to shareholders through our share repurchase and dividend programs

•  Increased dividend by 20% during fiscal 2018; announced plan to increase an additional 25% in fiscal 2019

•  $49.3 billion market cap at fiscalyear-end

•  Opened our 4,000th store, with 4,070 total stores at fiscal year-end

•  More than 250 stores opened during fiscal 2018

•  Launched a second home store concept in the U.S., Homesense

1Comparable store sales are defined in Appendix A.

LOGOLOGO

LOGO

*See Appendix A for notes on Annual Sales Growth chart and reconciliations of adjusted EPS to GAAP EPS.

30    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

FISCAL 2018 INCENTIVE PLAN PERFORMANCE

Our performance in fiscal 2018 led to the following results under our performance-based incentive plans:

Actual results were below our target for our namedannual incentive plan (MIP). Results were impacted by a goodwill impairment charge taken during the fourth quarter related to our prior acquisition of Sierra Trading Post and challenges from severe weather during the year. Consistent with our pay for performance focus, below-target performance for corporate MIP target resulted in below-target payouts for our NEOs.

Actual results were above target for our fiscal 2016-2018 performance cycle, reflecting the consistency and strength of the company’s performance over the longer term. This performance resulted in above target payouts for our long-term cash incentive plan (LRPIP) and full performance vesting for the long-term PBSAs on that cycle.

Additional details about these performance results and the payouts for each NEO are included below.

CEO TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION

The chart below shows the total direct compensation1 of our CEO, including results of ournon-equity incentive compensation payouts, compared to recent years.

LOGO

1  Total direct compensation for each fiscal year consists of the following elements: base salary,

     annual cash incentives earned (MIP), and long term incentives, consisting of equity awards valued

     at grant date (PBSAs granted during the fiscal year for Mr. Herrman or allocated to the year of the

     related service and performance for Ms. Meyrowitz and stock options granted during the fiscal

     year); and long-term cash earned (LRPIP with performance periods ending in that fiscal year).

2018 Proxy Statement    31


LOGO

FISCAL 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Our fiscal year 2018 executive officers includescompensation program consisted of base salary incentiveand annual and long-term incentives as summarized below:

Base Salary

•  Provide a base level of compensation to reflect individual responsibilities, experience, and value in the marketplace

•  Recognize individual performance

Annual Cash

Incentives

Management Incentive Plan (MIP)

•  Incentivize performance to reach or exceed our annual financial objectives

•  Encourage engagement, teamwork, and collaboration within divisions

•  Reward achievement of financial goals for the current year

Long Term
Incentives

Equity: PBSAs and Stock Options

•  Align executive interests with shareholders

•  Reward corporate performance reflected in stock performance

•  Support longer-term retention objectives

Cash: Long Range Performance Incentive Plan (LRPIP)

•  Incentivize performance to reach or exceed our longer-term financial objectives across the company

•  Foster teamwork and collaboration across divisions

•  Reward company-wide achievement of multi-year financial goals

•  Support longer-term retention objectives

Our program also includes health and welfare, deferred compensation, (both cash and equity)retirement benefits, as well as relocation-related benefits and other benefits, each oflimited perquisites. Our overall executive compensation program is intended to sustain our competitive position, promote Associate engagement and retention, foster alignment with shareholder interests, and support effective leadership development, succession planning, and leadership transitions, which is described further below. Rather than applying a set formula, the ECC evaluates and balances the overall mix of compensation elements.we believe are critical to our success.

32    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Base Salary

Each of our named executive officers receives a base salary in cash during the fiscal year that is intended to

Base salaries provide competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain the executive at a level commensurate with his or herour executives and to reflect individual responsibilities, performance, experience, and value in the marketplace. Base salaries are typically reviewed on an annual basis in connection with individual performance evaluations and may be reviewed in connection with new employment agreements, new positions, or other significant changes in responsibilities. Base salaries atorganizational changes. For fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019, the end of fiscal 2015 are listed below.

    Base Salaries at Fiscal 2015 Year End    

Carol Meyrowitz

$  1,575,000

Ernie Herrman

$  1,340,000

Michael MacMillan

$     970,000

Richard Sherr

$     820,000

Scott Goldenberg

$     675,000

The ECC approved base salariessalary increases as part of our annual individual performance and salary review process for each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, who did not receive salary increases for fiscal 20152019, and Mr. MacMillan, whose compensation arrangements reflect his move to Canada during fiscal 2018 and his scheduled retirement during fiscal 2019. Salary reviews are based on various factors, including assessment of individual performance and responsibilities, our fiscal 2014prior year performance, contractual obligations, and overall competitiveness. The ECC approved salary increases for eachcompetitiveness of our named executive officers as part of our annual individual performance and salary review process described above.compensation.

Base Salaries at Fiscal 2018 Year-End

 

 

Ernie Herrman

  $1,600,000 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $1,040,000 

Michael MacMillan

  CAD$1,418,280 

Richard Sherr

  $1,050,000 

Scott Goldenberg

  $900,000 

 

Annual Cash Incentives

A portion of each named executive officer’s compensation consists of cash incentives granted under ourIncentives: Management Incentive Plan (MIP) and Long Range Performance Incentive Plan (LRPIP). Awards under these plans require achievement, at levels specified by

The objective of the ECC, of performance goals based on performance measures approved by our stockholders. Performance results for both MIP and LRPIP must be certified by the ECC, which has the authority to reduce but not increase the awards to our named executive officers. All MIP and LRPIP awards are subject to a maximum individual payout limit under plan terms (no more than $5.5125 million for fiscal 2015 MIP and no more than $5 million for the fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP cycle). Our cash incentives granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2015 were intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

Annual Cash Incentives (MIP). The short-termannual cash incentive awards made under our MIP are designedis to motivate our named executive officersNEOs and other key Associates to achieve or exceed a fiscal year performance target

pre-established set in advance by the ECC for the fiscal year. Each individual MIP award has a target award opportunity, expressed as a percentageECC.

Key Features of base salary earned during the fiscal year,MIP:

Broad-based program that extends throughout our global organization, emphasizing team-based execution of our business strategies

Performance tied to objective annual business goals

Performance results must be certified by the ECC

No discretionary increases for fiscal year goals2018 MIP payments to our NEOs

Maximum individual payout limits apply to all awards (for fiscal 2018, no more than $6,318,408, and no more than 200% of each individual award opportunity)

Performance goals: For fiscal 2018, the ECC determined that for one or more ofMIP, annual adjustedpre-tax income was an appropriate and effective measure to motivate, focus, and reward operational performance across the divisions (divisional goals) or a combination of our four major divisions (corporate goals). The goals and target opportunitiescompany, particularly for our named executive officers for fiscal 2015 are shown below.

Fiscal 2015 MIP: Target Opportunities and Goals
  

Name

  

% of Salary

 

$ Target

   Goals

Carol Meyrowitz

  150% $    2,362,503    Corporate

Ernie Herrman

  100% $1,327,693    Corporate

Michael MacMillan

    55% $529,270    75% TJX Europe; 25% Corporate 

Richard Sherr

    55% $446,770    75% Marmaxx; 25% Corporate

Scott Goldenberg

    55% $364,905    Corporate

For each fiscal year, the ECC pre-establishes the divisional and corporate performance targets, the amounts payable at different levels of performance, specified rates for converting foreignmanagement.Pre-tax income (to remove the intra-year impact of changes in currency exchange rates) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent (but objectively determinable) events that may affect performance. For fiscal 2015, the MIP performance targets were set at specified levels of pre-tax income for each division (or, for corporate awards, a specified level of consolidated pre-tax income for the Marmaxx, HomeGoods, TJX Europe and TJX Canada divisions), adjusted to exclude in each case capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense, and U.S. e-commerce and to reflect the pre-established exchange rates. As annual pre-tax income is a profitability measure, it reflects other metrics, such as revenue and operating expenses, and is used across ourthe company to plan, manage, and evaluate our business. The ECC continued to view adjusted annual pre-tax incomebelieves that it is a key measure of our success, as an appropriate metric to motivateit reflectstop-line performance, effective management of expenses and reward year-over-year performanceprofitability; promotes consistency of focus across the company particularlyover short- and long-term performance periods; and is objective and understandable by our participants.

Our NEOs’ fiscal 2018 MIP award opportunities were tied to the aggregate of all divisional MIP goals, which we refer to as the corporate goal, to emphasize each NEO’s accountability to the business as a whole. MIP goals are generally intended to reflect the company’s strategic planning for the next fiscal year and are built from Board-approved annual business plans for our management.divisions. In setting these goals,the corporate MIP goal for fiscal 2018, the ECC believed that the various targets weretarget was challenging but reasonably achievable (considering, among other things, anticipated wage pressures, market volatility, and currency exchange volatility), and that the payout formulas reflected an appropriatepay-for-performance sensitivity based on the maturity and expected growth of each division. As a result of this

2018 Proxy Statement    33


LOGO

process, the ECC established fiscal 2018 corporate MIP performance targets that were higher than both fiscal 2017 corporate MIP performance targets and fiscal 2017 corporate MIP actual results, even after accounting for the estimated benefit of the fiscal 2018 53rd week. The ECC also established a maximum payout percentagespecified rates for converting foreign income (to remove the impact of 200%.translational foreign exchange) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent events that may affect performance.

The fiscal 20152018 MIP performance levels and corresponding payout percentages are shown below, including the thresholdsperformance target, threshold (the level of performance at or below which no payout would be made), and maximumsmaximum (the level at or above which the award payout would be the maximum under the award terms). After the end of the fiscal year,2018, our actual performance iswas measured against the pre-established performance targetstarget and MIP performance results arewere certified by the ECC. Participants are eligible

Fiscal 2018 MIP Goals

   

Payout Opportunity

(as a % of Target)

   Performance Goals:
AdjustedPre-Tax Income*
 
Performance Level    

Dollars

(in 000s)

   % of
Target
 

Threshold

   0  $3,970,415    88.89

Target

   100  $4,466,717    100

Maximum

   200  $4,838,943    108.33

* Our Fiscal 2018 corporate MIP goal for all NEOs consisted of a consolidated adjustedpre-tax income goal for all TJX divisions, which included all of our businesses: Marmaxx (T.J. Maxx and Marshalls), HomeGoods, TJX International (including TJX Europe (T.K. Maxx and Homesense) and Trade Secret in Australia (rebranded as T.K. Maxx during fiscal 2018)), TJX Canada and oure-commerce businesses (including Sierra Trading Post). Under the termspre-established by the ECC, MIP performance goals and results were adjusted to reflect thepre-established currency exchange rates (to remove the impact of translational foreign exchange) and to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense, andmark-to-market impact of inventory derivatives.

 

Performance results for fiscal 2018: Adjustedpre-tax income, which included the impact of the Sierra Trading Post impairment charge taken during the year, was $4,324,884, or 96.82% of target performance. This corresponded to receive theira final MIP payout percentage of 71.42%. Consistent with our pay for performance philosophy, the below-target results resulted in below-target MIP payouts for our NEOs, as detailed below.

Award opportunities and payouts: Each MIP award has a target award ifopportunity, expressed as a percentage of the individual’s base salary earned during the fiscal year. The ECC approved these individual award opportunities at the beginning of fiscal 2018 based on a variety of factors, including an assessment of overall competitiveness, mix of compensation elements, contractual obligations, and individual responsibilities. The fiscal 2018 MIP performance equals the target performance. The payout formulas pre-establishedaward earned by the ECC determine payout percentages for performance above or below target.

  
Fiscal 2015 MIP Performance Goals Fiscal 2015 MIP Performance Results

(in 000s)

 

 

                               (in 000s)                            

 

   

Threshold

(Payout % = 0%)

 

Target

(Payout % = 100%)

  

Maximum

(Payout % = 200%)

 MIP Performance  Payout %
      (% of Target)       (% of Target)    (% of Target)    

Corporate

 $ 3,397,173   87.5% $ 3,882,456   $ 4,270,682   110.0% $ 3,958,610    101.96% 119.62%

TJX Europe

 £169,271   80.0% £211,586   £241,811   114.3% £202,930    95.90% 79.55%

Marmaxx

 $ 2,434,048   88.9% $ 2,738,287   $ 2,966,466   108.3% $ 2,760,805    100.82% 109.87%

The payout of each individual MIP awardNEO was determined by applying the applicablecorporate MIP payout percentage of 71.42% to the individual’s target opportunity. Basedaward opportunity, as shown below.

34    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Fiscal 2018 MIP Opportunities and Payouts

   

Target

(as a % of Base Salary)

  

Target1

(as a $ amount)

  Actual
Amount Earned
 

Ernie Herrman

  150  $2,428,848   $1,734,683 

Carol Meyrowitz

  150  $1,580,770   $1,128,986 

Michael MacMillan2

  55  $   603,181   $   430,792 

Richard Sherr

  55  $   588,607   $   420,383 

Scott Goldenberg

  55  $   498,173   $   355,795 

1 Target amount based on actual U.S. salary earned during fiscal 2018, a53-week year, plus, in the case of Mr. MacMillan, an amount based on his annual CAD salary adjusted to reflect his period of service in Canada during fiscal 2018.

2 For Mr. MacMillan, CAD-denominated amounts were converted to USD at the average annual exchange rate of $0.7753 per CAD for fiscal 2018.

 

 

Long-Term Incentives

One of the key objectives of our long-term incentive programs is to strengthen the retention, succession planning, and stability of our leadership team, which has been a critical factor and key driver for the success of TJX. We use a mix of long-term vehicles to incentivize our executives, foster teamwork that drives execution of our business goals, and align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our shareholders.

Key Equity Grant Practices:

All equity awards are subject to individual award limits under the plan.

All stock awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2018 have three-year performance goals.

Noone-time equity grants were made to our NEOs during fiscal 2018.

All equity awards since September 2015 are “double-trigger” (no automatic full acceleration upon on a change of control).

All options have an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the NYSE on the grant date.

Equity awards are granted under our Stock Incentive Plan (SIP) and generally granted at our regularly scheduled ECC meetings, held at approximately the same times each year. The ECC does not have any programs, plans, or practices of timing these equity grants in coordination with the release of materialnon-public information.

Performance-Based Stock Awards (PBSAs). PBSAs include performance-based vesting conditions linked to TJX’s financial performance, resultsservice-based vesting conditions that provide important retention incentives, and retirement terms that support our succession planning process. Because our PBSAs granted prior to fiscal 2019 were designed to serve as a vehicle for fiscal 2015,stability and retention, and not solely as a performance incentive, targets for full PBSA vesting were set at a level below our cash incentive targets with no above-target opportunity. Vesting of these awards is subject to satisfaction of service requirements specified in the named executive officersawards (described below on p. 48) as well as the performance criteria described below.

2018 Proxy Statement    35


LOGO

Performance Vesting Criteria
for Long-Term PBSAs Granted Before Fiscal 20191
Full VestingPartial Vesting

Achievement of at least 87% of the targeted cumulativepre-tax income performance for the applicable three-year cycle2

Achievement of at least 60% of the targeted cumulativepre-tax income performance for

the applicable three-year cycle2

1 Applicable to fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based PBSAs granted in March 2015; fiscal 2017-2019 LRPIP-based PBSAs granted in March 2016; and fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP-based PBSAs granted in April 2017.

2 Full performance vesting requires a LRPIP payout of not less than 67% for the applicable cycle, and partial performance vesting requires a LRPIP payout above threshold level for the applicable cycle. For fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based PBSAs, reflects the applicable divisional weightings (described further below) and assumes that each division performed at the same level against its target.

Fiscal 2018 PBSAs

In April 2017, the ECC granted PBSAs to our NEOs, with corporate MIP goals earned awards equal to 119.62%the size of their targeteach award opportunities. Mr. MacMillan earned an award equal to 89.57% of his target award opportunity (79.55% payout for 75% of his awarddetermined based on TJX Europe plus 119.62% payout for 25%factors including the executive’s responsibilities, contractual obligations, the potential value of his awardeach grant, and the overall competitiveness and mix of our executive compensation. Each April 2017 PBSA included a fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP-based performance goal with a three-year vesting period, described in the table above.

Fiscal 2018 PBSAs

    Number of Shares   Grant Date Fair Value* 

Ernie Herrman

   117,325    $9,000,001 

Carol Meyrowitz

   65,181    $5,000,035 

Michael MacMillan

   40,000    $3,068,400 

Richard Sherr

   40,000    $3,068,400 

Scott Goldenberg

   40,000    $3,068,400 

* Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of April 2017 PBSAs as determined for financial reporting purposes. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note H to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018.

 

Previously Granted PBSAs

Each of our NEOs, other than Ms. Meyrowitz, held previously granted PBSAs with performance-based vesting criteria that were satisfied based on corporate results).fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP performance payout of 121.37%, as described further below. These PBSAs remained subject to service-based vesting conditions after fiscal 2018 year-end, as described in footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards table.

The career shares award granted to Mr. Sherr earned an award equalHerrman during fiscal 2016 in connection with the CEO transition is scheduled to 112.30%vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026 withpro-rated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to his target award opportunity (109.87% payoutcontinued employment with TJX. The remaining service condition for 75%the PBSA granted to Ms. Meyrowitz during fiscal 2016 in connection with the CEO transition was satisfied at the end of his award basedfiscal 2018.

36    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Stock Options. Stock options help align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders because they only deliver value to the extent the value of our stock appreciates. The ECC determined the number of stock options granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2018 by setting a fixed dollar value for each NEO (other than Ms. Meyrowitz) and dividing this value by the closing price of our common stock on Marmaxx plus 119.62% for 25% of his award basedthe NYSE on corporate)the grant date ($73.21). The actual MIP award earnedfixed dollar value established for each NEO is a function of internal compensation levels and historical practices and was reviewed by each namedthe ECC for overall market competitiveness. Stock options generally vest in equal annual installments over three years from the grant date. As noted above, stock options have been eliminated for our NEOs in our new fiscal 2019 executive officer for fiscal 2015 is included in the Non-Equitycompensation program.

Fiscal 2018 Stock Option Awards

    Number of Shares   Grant Date Fair Value1 

Ernie Herrman

   43,220    $618,910 

Carol Meyrowitz2

        

Michael MacMillan

   19,540    $279,813 

Richard Sherr

   22,540    $322,773 

Scott Goldenberg

   19,540    $279,813 

1 Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of September 2017 option awards as determined for financial reporting purposes. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note H to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018.

 

2Under the terms of her employment agreement effective at the beginning of fiscal 2017, Ms. Meyrowitz is not eligible for new option grants.

 

 

Long Range Performance Incentive Plan column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Long-Term Cash Incentives (LRPIP). The long-term cash incentive LRPIP awards made under our LRPIP are based on cumulative divisional performance targets for a multi-year period. The program is designed to motivate our named executive officersNEOs and other key Associates to achieve or exceed long-term financial goals, as well as to foster teamwork and collaboration across the company and promote retention. As our LRPIP awards have overlapping multi-yearthree-year cycles, in each fiscal year we complete a cycle, continue our performance under an ongoing cycle and grant awards for a new cycle.

CompletionKey Features of LRPIP:

Broad-based program that extends throughout our global organization, emphasizing team-based execution of our company-wide business strategies over a longer time horizon

Performance tied to objective long-term business goals

Performance results must be certified by the ECC

No discretionary increases for fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP payments to our NEOs

Maximum individual payout limits apply to all awards (no more than $5,788,125, and no more than 200% of each NEO award opportunity, for the fiscal 2016-2018 cycle)

Fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP – Completed Cycle.

Performance conditions: LRPIP goals and awards for the fiscal 2013-20152016-2018 cycle were granted in fiscal 2013, with individual target opportunities and company-wide performance goals. Our named executive officers’ target award opportunities for this cycle were pre-establishedestablished by the ECC as follows:

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP: Target Opportunities

Name

Target

Carol Meyrowitz

$  1,400,000

Ernie Herrman

$  1,100,000

Michael MacMillan

$     700,000

Richard Sherr

$     400,000

Scott Goldenberg

$     300,000

The ECC pre-established theduring fiscal 2016. LRPIP performance goals including multi-year performance targets and weightings for each division, amounts payable at different levels of performance, specified rates for converting foreign income (to remove the intra-cycle impact of currency exchange rates) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent (but objectively determinable) events that may affect performance. For fiscal 2013-2015 cycle, the LRPIP target (shown in column A in the table below) was based on pre-tax income targets for our four major divisions for the three-year period, adjusted to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense and U.S. e-commerce andare generally intended to reflect the pre-established exchange rates. Adjusted pre-tax income overcompany’s longer-term strategic planning, which is built from Board-approved company business plans and starts with our operating divisions, taking into account a multi-year period was considered by the ECC to be an appropriate metric to use as a basis for plan targets to motivate and reward long-term performance, as it is a core business metric used across our company to plan long-term growth, manage our divisions and evaluate our long-term performance. The ECC also established divisional weightings (shown in column B in the table below), designed to maintain focusvariety of factors at the smaller divisions, and a maximum LRPIP payout percentage of 150%, with each division contributing between 0% and 150% towardtime the final payout for performance ranging from 33% to 133% of the divisional performance target.goals are established. In setting these levels,the fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP goals, the ECC believed that the targets were challenging but reasonably achievable and reflected the long-term growth goals for our primary divisions. The ECC determined that the payout formulas reflected an appropriatepay-for-performance sensitivity for a long-term incentive program; that cumulative three-year adjustedpre-tax income was an appropriate and effective metric to motivate, focus, and reward operational performance across the company over a longer time horizon; and that using thea weighted combination of performance of our mainfour major divisions helps towould promote our team-based approach to achieving our long-term goals. The fiscal 2016-2018 goals also included specified rates for converting foreign income (to remove the impact of translational foreign exchange) and automatic adjustments to reflect certain contingent but objectively determinable events that may affect performance.

2018 Proxy Statement    37


LOGO

Performance results for the fiscal 2016-2018 cycle:After the end of fiscal 2015, divisional2018, LRPIP performance results for this cycle were certified by the ECC.

Fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP Goals and Results

(AdjustedPre-Tax Income1 in 000s)

  Performance Goals  Actual Performance Results 
Division 

Threshold2

60%
performance

(Payout% = 0%)

  

Cumulative 3-Year
Performance
Target

(Payout% = 100%)

  

Maximum2

140%
performance

(Payout% = 200%)

  Divisional
Weighting
  Actual
Cumulative
3-Year
Performance
  Unweighted
Divisional
Contribution
to Award
Payout%
  Weighted
Divisional
Contribution
to Award
Payout%
 
       (A)      (B)  (C)  (D)  (B x D) 

Marmaxx

  $5,084,581   $  8,474,301   $  11,864,021   68.5 $9,129,890   119.35  81.75

HomeGoods

  $   943,765   $  1,572,942   $    2,202,119   10.5 $1,820,857   139.40  14.64

TJX Canada

  C$ 760,066   C$1,266,777   C$  1,773,488   10.5 C$1,737,064   192.95  20.26

TJX Europe

  £   465,012   £     775,020   £    1,085,028   10.5 £604,430   44.98  4.72
               100  Total Payout:3   121.37

1 Fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP performance was measured by adjustedpre-tax income goals for our four major divisions for the three-year cycle (shown in column C inperiod as shown above. (TJX Europe was renamed TJX International at the table below) was measured against each divisional targetend of fiscal 2016.) Under the termspre-established by the ECC at the beginning of fiscal 2016, LRPIP performance goals and results were adjusted to reflectpre-established currency exchange rates (to remove the impact of translational foreign exchange) and to exclude capitalized inventory costs, interest income and expense,mark-to-market impact of inventory derivatives, and certain new businesses (Austria, the Netherlands, U.S.e-commerce, and Trade Secret). Fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP performance results were certified by the ECC. Participants are eligible to receive their target award if the LRPIP performance target at each division is met and the payout formulas pre-establishedfurther adjusted downward by the ECC determineto exclude certain transactional foreign exchange gains at TJX Europe during fiscal 2017.

2 The threshold and maximum amounts shown assume that each division performs at the same level against its target. Because each division contributes toward the final payout percentageswithout a divisional threshold or maximum (to reflect aggregate company results), there is no single level of performance for divisionalthreshold or maximum payouts.

3 To calculate the total payout, the actual performance above or below target. The resulting(column C) is measured against the performance target for each division (column A). Apre-established payout percentages (shown in column D informula determines the table below) areunweighted contribution of each division to the award payout (column D). Each unweighted contribution (column D) is then weighted according to thepre-established divisional weightings (column B)B x column D) and added together to determine the overall LRPIP award payout percentage.

   

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP

Performance Goals

 

      

Fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP

Performance Results

 

 
    

Cumulative 3-Year
Performance Target

(in 000s)

   Divisional
Weightings
      

Cumulative 3-Year
LRPIP Performance

(in 000s)

   Unweighted
Contribution to
Award Payout %
   Weighted Contribution 
to Award Payout %
 
    (A)   (B)      (C)   (D)   (D x B) 

Marmaxx

     $    6,947,870     68.5%           $    7,896,454     120.48 %     82.53 %  

HomeGoods

     $863,164     10.5%           $1,170,626     150.00 %     15.75 %  

TJX Europe

     £362,328     10.5%           £516,489     150.00 %     15.75 %  

TJX Canada

  C$1,173,756     10.5%        C$1,245,458     109.17 %     11.46 %  
     

 

 

        
                 
         100%               Total Payout     125.49%  

The payoutAward opportunities and payouts:At the beginning of eachthe fiscal 2016-2018 cycle, the ECC approved individual LRPIP award opportunities based on a variety of factors, including an assessment of overall competitiveness, mix of compensation elements, contractual obligations, and individual responsibilities at the time of the grant. The actual LRPIP award earned for each individual is determined by applying the overall payout percentage to the individual’s target opportunity for that cycle. The actual LRPIP amounts earnedthe cycle multiplied by the named executive officers fortotal payout percentage of 121.37%, as shown below.

    

Fiscal 2016-2018

Target Opportunities

   Fiscal 2016-2018
LRPIP Actual
Award Earned
 

Ernie Herrman*

   $1,100,000         $1,335,070   

Carol Meyrowitz*

   $1,575,000         $1,911,577   

Michael MacMillan

   $   700,000         $   849,590   

Richard Sherr

   $   500,000         $   606,850   

Scott Goldenberg

   $   500,000         $   606,850   

* In fiscal 2016 when these awards were granted, Mr. Herrman served as the President of the company and Ms. Meyrowitz as the CEO. The CEO transition occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2017, when Mr. Herrman became CEO and President and Ms. Meyrowitz became Executive Chairman.

 

38    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP – New Cycle

At the beginning of fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP awards are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

New LRPIP Cycle. During fiscal 2015,2018, the ECC established the followingnew LRPIP dollar target award opportunities and performance goals for the fiscal 2015-20172018-2020 cycle for our named executive officers: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,575,000; Mr. Herrman, $1,100,000; Mr. MacMillan, $700,000; Mr. Sherr, $500,000;NEOs. These opportunities were set after consideration of a variety of factors, including an assessment of overall competitiveness, mix of compensation elements, contractual obligations, and Mr. Goldenberg, $500,000. Theindividual responsibilities at the time of the grant and are as follows:

Fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP Target Opportunities

Ernie Herrman

$1,600,000

Carol Meyrowitz

$1,040,000

Michael MacMillan

$   700,000

Richard Sherr

$   700,000

Scott Goldenberg

$   500,000

As part of the company’s long-term strategic planning process for fiscal years 2018 through 2020, the ECC also established the LRPIP performanceadjustedpre-tax income target for this new three-year cycle based on aggregate targets for each division for the new cycle,all divisions (without divisional weightings,weightings), payout formulas, and a maximum LRPIP payout percentage of 200%. The target is intended to be consistent with the Board-approved business plans for the fiscal 2015-2017 cycle, with each division contributing toward the final payout without a divisional threshold or maximumour divisions, to reflect aggregate company results. Assuming that each division performs at the same level against its target performance, thelong-term growth goals for these divisions, and to be challenging but reasonably achievable. The minimum (threshold) level for any payout is 60% of the performance target and the maximum payout level is achieved if performance is at or above 140% of the performance target.

Consistent with our past disclosure practice, we plan to provide additional detail about the performance goals for this cycle, which are based on business targets forthrough fiscal 2015 and future periods (fiscal 2016 and fiscal 2017),2020, once the performance cycle is complete.

Equity Incentives

 

Equity awards are made under the SIP, generally in the form of stock options and performance-based stock awards. Stock options do not deliver value unless the value of our stock appreciates and then only to the extent of such appreciation, thus linking the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. Performance-based stock awards include vesting conditions requiring achievement of pre-established performance criteria, linked to TJX’s financial performance. Both stock options and performance-based stock awards also have service-based vesting conditions that provide important retention incentives. Our equity incentives granted to our named executive officers during fiscal 2015 were intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m).

Stock Option Grants. The ECC determined the number of stock options granted to our named executive officers in September 2014 by setting a fixed dollar value for each named executive officer and dividing this value by the stock price on the grant date. The fixed dollar value for named executive officers is a function of internal compensation levels and historical practices and is reviewed by the ECC for overall market competitiveness. All option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the NYSE on the date of grant.

Performance Based Stock Awards.

Vesting of Performance-Based Stock Awards. Each named executive officer held performance-based stock awards with performance-based vesting criteria that were satisfied based on fiscal 2015 MIP performance or fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP performance, as follows:

Equity Grant Practices

•      All of our equity awards are made under our shareholder-approved Stock Incentive Plan (SIP).

•      The exercise price of each stock option grant is the closing stock price on the NYSE on the grant date.

•      The ECC does not have any programs, plans or practices of timing these equity grants in coordination with the release of material non-public information.

•      Virtually all of our equity awards are granted at regularly scheduled ECC meetings held at approximately the same times each year and scheduled in advance.

 

The MIP-based award held by Ms. Meyrowitz fully vested upon ECC certification of achievement of a fiscal 2015 payout of 119.62% of the corporate MIP target awards (as described underAnnual Cash

Incentives (MIP), above). The performance condition for full vesting was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the corporate MIP target payout, which required us to achieve 96% of the targeted performance reflected in the fiscal 2015 plan.

LRPIP-based awards held by our other named executive officers contained performance-based vesting conditions that were satisfied upon ECC certification of achievement of a payout of 125.49% of the fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP target awards (as described underCompletion of LRPIP Cycle, above). The performance condition for full vesting of these awards was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP target payout, which, reflecting the weighting of the divisions and assuming that each division performed at the same level against its target performance, required us to achieve 78% of the targeted cumulative performance reflected in that plan. These awards remained subject to service-based vesting conditions after fiscal 2015 year end, as described in footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards table.

Grants of New Performance-Based Stock Awards. The ECC awarded new performance-based stock awards in fiscal 2015 to our named executive officers based on factors including the executive’s responsibilities, the potential value of each grant and the overall competitiveness and mix of executive compensation. Ms. Meyrowitz’s performance-based stock award was granted at the end of fiscal 2015 in connection with her entering into a new employment agreement as described below and includes vesting conditions requiring satisfaction of MIP-based performance goals and service requirements for fiscal 2016. The other named executive officers received fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-based stock awards.

These awards are reflected in the compensation tables below. Full vesting of these awards is subject to satisfaction of performance-based conditions requiring achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the target corporate MIP or LRPIP payout for the performance period, which will require us to achieve 96% of targeted performance under MIP (for the fiscal 2016 MIP-based award) or 87% of targeted cumulative performance under LRPIP (for fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-based awards), taking into account divisional weightings and assuming that each division performs at the same level against its target performance. Performance resulting in a payout below this target level reduces the number of shares that would otherwise vest, pro rata, with no shares vesting if no payout is achieved. Vesting of these awards is also subject to satisfaction of service requirements specified in the awards. The ECC believes that, in addition to linking individual compensation to our target performance, these awards perform an important retention function.OTHER COMPENSATION PRACTICES, POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

 

Reporting of Performance-Based Stock Awards

Our performance-based stock awards include vesting conditions requiring satisfaction of performance and service requirements pre-established by the ECC. Under SEC rules, these awards are reported in the proxy statement in the year of grant, as determined for accounting purposes under ASC Topic 718. As a result, the equity compensation of our named executive officers shown in the Summary Compensation Table and in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table as granted for a particular year sometimes reflects awards intended by the ECC to compensate the executives for service and performance in other years. See footnote 3 to the Outstanding Equity Awards table for further detail on the vesting terms for stock awards held by our named executive officers.

Other Compensation ComponentsRETIREMENT BENEFITS

Retirement Benefits.All of our named executive officersNEOs, other than Mr. MacMillan, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan and also participate in aour broad-based pension plan for U.S. Associates under which benefits are accrued based on compensation and service. We also maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). Ms. Meyrowitz is a vested participant in our primary SERP benefit program, a nonqualified pension benefit based on final average earnings. We have not offered primary SERP benefits to new participants for many years. Mr. Herrman, Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg participate in our alternative SERP benefit program, which

is intended to restore pension benefits that would otherwise not be available due to Internal Revenue Code restrictions. Mr. MacMillan was eligible to participate in our U.S. retirement benefit programs for a portion of fiscal 2018, and, following his move to Canada, became eligible to participate in our Canadian retirement benefit programs for the balance of fiscal 2018. Long term incentives are not included in defined benefit pension calculations, and we do not have a policy of granting extra years of credited service for purposes of our pension plans. These programs are discussed underPension Benefits, below.Benefits.

Deferred Compensation. Our named executive officers canDEFERRED COMPENSATION

During fiscal 2018, our NEOs could defer compensation under our Executive Savings Plan (ESP), an elective deferred compensation plan, intended to help us compete for and retain talent by providing participants with additional opportunities for personal financial planning and by rewarding and encouraging retention.retention while emphasizing performance-based pay. Participants in the ESP, other than those eligible for our primary SERP benefit, are eligible to receive an employer match based in part on our performance under our MIP. Mr. Herrman, Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg received thisan ESP match for fiscal 2015. Amounts deferred2018. Mr. MacMillan received an ESP match for a portion of fiscal

2018 Proxy Statement    39


LOGO

2018, and, following his move to Canada, became eligible to participate and receive a match under our Canadian Executive Savings Plan (CESP) for the balance of fiscal 2018.

Under his employment agreement, Mr. Herrman is eligible for additional performance-based company credits under the ESP for each of fiscal 2017, fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019. The credits are notionally investedmade to Mr. Herrman’s ESP account after the end of the applicable fiscal year if he remains employed through the end of the year and to the extent applicable MIP performance goals are met for the year, with no credit provided if no MIP payout is achieved for the year. Mr. Herrman received the full additional ESP credit for fiscal 2018, which required achievement of at least 96% of the targeted corporate MIP performance (resulting in mutual funds ora MIP payout of at least 67%) for the year. The additional credits (and any earnings under the ESP) are payable to Mr. Herrman following his separation from service with the company if he complies with applicable post-employmentnon-competition,non-solicitation, and other market investments selected bycovenants intended to protect the participant. company. In determining the magnitude, duration, and conditions of the additional credits under ESP, the ECC undertook a holistic look at Mr. Herrman’s career compensation opportunities at the time of his transition to CEO, with the objective of ensuring the long-term retention of Mr. Herrman for the duration of his career as CEO while emphasizing performance-based pay. The additional performance-based ESP credits for Mr. Herrman are not intended to continue beyond fiscal 2019.

Ms. Meyrowitz has amounts previously deferred under our General Deferred Compensation Plan (GDCP), now closed to new deferrals, which earn notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on U.S. Treasury securities. Mr. MacMillan also has amounts previously saved under our Canadian Executive Savings Plan (CESP). Our deferred compensation plans for named executive officersNEOs are discussed with the compensation tables below underNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.Plans. Company-provided amounts under these programs are included below as All Other Compensation and detailed in footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table.

Relocation and Expatriate-Related Expenses.EXPATRIATE-RELATED BENEFITS

As part of our global mobility program, our policies provide that executive officers and other eligible Associates who relocate at our request are eligible for certain relocation and expatriate benefits to facilitate the transition and international assignment, including moving expenses, allowances for housing and goods and services, and tax assistance. These policies are intended to recognize and compensate Associates for higherthe costs associated with living and working outside the Associates’ home countries, with the goal that Associates are not financially advantaged or disadvantaged as a result of their international assignment and related taxes. During fiscal 2015,2018, Mr. MacMillan continued his leadership of our European division as Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, after relocating from the U.S. to the U.K. in fiscal 2013, and wasbe eligible for expatriate benefits under this program.program in connection with his prior assignments in the U.K. and Canada. These expensesbenefits are detailed in footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table.

Perquisites.PERQUISITES

We provide limited perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers.NEOs, which are reviewed every year by the ECC. These benefits consist generally of automobile allowances, financial and tax planning services, payment of life insurance premiums, and, for Mr. MacMillan, certain Canada-based benefits, none of which is grossed up for taxes. The amounts are included below as All Other Compensation and detailed in footnote 5 to the Summary Compensation Table, consist generally of automobile allowances, financial and tax planning services and payment of insurance premiums. None of these perquisites is grossed up for taxes.Table.

> Related Policies and ConsiderationsSTOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

Stock Ownership Guidelines.We have stock ownership guidelines that apply to all of our executive officers. Our ChiefCEO and President and our Executive Officer isChairman are expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times annual base compensation. Our President, Chief Financial Officer and each Senior Executive Vice President are expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value of at least three times annual base compensation. At age 62, the ownership guidelines are reduced by fifty percent. These guidelines are designed to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholdersshareholders and to encourage a long-term focus. Our policies also prohibit our executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to TJX stock. As of April 14, 2015,9, 2018, each of our executive officers was in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines and policies. Our policies also prohibit our executive officers from engaging in pledging or hedging transactions with respect to TJX stock.

Employment Agreements.40    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

The ECC has reviewed and approved, after consultation with its independent compensation consultant,Pearl Meyer, individual employment agreements for our named executive officersNEOs that set their terms of employment, including compensation, benefits, and termination and change of control provisions discussed below underSeverance, Retirement, and Change of Control Provisions.Provisions. We believe that these employment agreements help retain our executives and support our succession planning process.process, including our CEO transition at the start of fiscal 2017. The ECC takes the terms of these agreements into account when approving compensation for our named executive officers, including the performance-based stock award granted toNEOs.

Each of our NEO employment agreements has a three-year term. Our agreements with Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, unless terminated earlier in connectionaccordance with her entering into a new employment agreement during fiscal 2015.

their terms, continue until February 2, 2019. In January 2014,February 2018, we entered into a new employment agreementagreements with Mr. MacMillan,Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr, which became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2015 and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, continues until January 28, 2017. In January 2015, we entered into new employment agreements, effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016, with Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Goldenberg, and Mr. Sherr. The agreements replace the existing two-year agreement with Ms. Meyrowitz and the existing three-year agreements with Mr. Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr,2019 and, unless terminated earlier in accordance with their terms, will continue until January 28, 201730, 2021. Mr. MacMillan is scheduled to retire from TJX in April 2018, and in January 2018 we entered into a letter agreement with him confirming the caseterms of Ms. Meyrowitz and until February 3, 2018 in the case of Mr. Goldenberg and Mr. Sherr.his retirement.

The agreements with our named executive officersNEOs establish a minimum level of base salary and provide for participation in the SIP, MIP and LRPIP, at levels commensurate with the executive’s position and responsibilities and subject to terms established by the ECC, and also entitle the executives to participate in TJX’s fringe benefit and deferred compensation plans. Consistent with her prior agreements,plans, including, in the agreement withcase of Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, reflectsan automobile allowance commensurate with their respective positions and, in the understanding that she has delegatedcase of Mr. MacMillan, the company’s executive life insurance program. Mr. Herrman’s and is expected to continue to delegate certain day-to-day responsibilities while retaining responsibility for all executive functions associated with her duties and responsibilities as CEO of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreementagreements also providesprovide for minimum MIP and LRPIP target award levels during the term of the agreements. Mr. Herrman’s agreement as well as limited perquisitesprovides for enhanced benefits to him under our ESP, including an increased company match and specifiedthe additional performance-based company credits described above in Deferred Compensation. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreement provides for annual performance-based stock awards with a grant date value of $5 million that will be subject to satisfaction of performance criteria with a three-year performance vesting period and also specifies interest rate assumptions for determining her SERP benefit. Mr. MacMillan’s agreement includes expatriate-related benefits and other provisions related to his assignment with TJX Europe.move to Canada during 2017 and his prior international assignments.

Severance and Change of Control Provisions.SEVERANCE, RETIREMENT, AND CHANGE OF CONTROL PROVISIONS

We provide severance termsbenefits to our executive officers, includingin connection with certain terminations of employment and in connection with a change of control inof TJX, under the terms of our employment agreements and plans. In connection with these terms, each named executive officerEach NEO has agreed to post-employmentnon-competition,non-solicitation and other covenants intended to protect our business. We believe that severance, retirement, and change of control protections assist in attracting and retaining high quality executives and in keeping them focused on their responsibilities during any period in which a change of control may be contemplated or pending and that, more generally, it is important to define the relative obligations of TJX and our named executive officers,NEOs, including obtaining protection against competition and solicitation. We seek to achieve these objectives in a manner consistent with our shareholder-friendly pay practices,other compensation objectives described above, taking into account contractual obligations and current market practice, among other considerations. These provisions are described in more detail underPotential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.Control.

Clawback Policy. CLAWBACK POLICY

We have a clawback policy that, in the event of a material restatement of financial results, allows the Board, based on available remedies, to seek recovery or forfeiture from any current or former executive officer of the portion of incentive compensation that was received by or vested in the executive officer during the three-year period prior to the determination that a restatement was required and that would not have been earned had performance been measured on the basis of the restated results where the Board reasonably determines that the executive engaged in knowing or intentional fraudulent or illegal conduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement.

Annual Compensation Risk Assessment.2018 Proxy Statement    41


LOGO

ANNUAL COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

As discussed inCompensation Program Risk Assessment, above, on p. 11, we consider our compensation policies and practices, including our executive officers’ compensation program, as part of our annual enterprise risk assessment process. The ECC considers, among other things, what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive compensation plans and arrangements and how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated and managed. In fiscal 2015,2018, the ECC determined that our overall compensation policies and practices do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX.

Tax and Accounting Considerations.TAX AND ACCOUNTING CONSIDERATIONS

We generally structurehave historically structured incentive compensation arrangements with a view towardstoward qualifying them as performance-based compensation exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)), butalthough we have viewed and continue to view the availability of a tax deduction as only one relevant consideration. Further, theThe ECC believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains, and rewards the executive talent necessary for our success. Consequently,

Federal tax legislation enacted in December 2017 eliminated the ECC authorizesSection 162(m) performance-based compensation in excess of $1 million that is not exempt from the deduction limitations underexemption prospectively and made other changes to Section 162(m)., but with a transition rule that preserves the performance-based compensation exemption for certain arrangements and awards in place as of November 2, 2017. We intend to continue to administer arrangements and awards subject to this transition rule with a view toward preserving their eligibility for the performance-based compensation exemption to the extent practicable and consistent with thenon-tax

compensation program objectives noted above.

Compensation Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on these reviews and discussions, we recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015.February 3, 2018.

Executive Compensation Committee

Alan M. Bennett,ChairChairman

José B. Alvarez

John F. O’BrienJackwyn L. Nemerov

Willow B. Shire

William H. Swanson*

* Mr. Swanson joined the ECC in February 2015.42    The TJX Companies, Inc.


Summary Compensation TableLOGO

COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and our three other most highly paid executive officers during fiscal 20152018 (collectively, our named executive officers)officers (NEOs)):

 

Name and

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 

Salary(1)

 

Bonus

 

Stock

Awards(2)

  

Option

Awards(2)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compen-

sation(3)

 

Change in

Pension Value

and Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)

 

All Other

Compen-

sation(5)

 

Total

 

Carol Meyrowitz(6)

 2015 $1,575,002   $16,485,000   $636,000 $4,582,886 $5,369,489 $  44,014  $  28,692,391  

Chief Executive Officer

 2014   1,475,001   13,898,400     680,528   4,623,832   1,793,231     43,041     22,514,033  
 2013   1,426,924   10,872,000     654,630   6,050,370   2,716,326     48,550     21,768,800  

Ernie Herrman(7)

 2015   1,327,693     7,954,700     530,760   2,968,577    963,397   361,869       14,106,996  

President

 2014   1,260,002     6,158,100     567,934   2,876,223    286,123    356,994       11,505,376  
 2013   1,205,770     7,312,350     546,279   2,999,808    416,056    340,672       12,820,935  

Michael MacMillan(8)

 2015      962,308     2,447,600     287,520   1,352,483    470,719   1,980,244        7,500,874  

SEVP, Group President

 2014      912,310     1,894,800     307,586   1,216,798    225,462  1,968,434        6,525,390  
 2013      886,732     1,594,800     295,961   1,416,231    236,223  3,287,710        7,717,657  

Richard Sherr

 2015      812,309     2,141,650     331,680   1,003,716    514,560    237,658        5,041,573  

SEVP, Group President

 2014      762,308     1,421,100     307,586      926,275    157,923    232,728        3,807,920  
 2013      733,849     1,196,100     295,961   1,099,700    263,712    220,858        3,810,180  

Scott Goldenberg

 2015      663,463     1,835,700     287,520      812,969    371,148    178,764        4,149,564  

SEVP, Chief Financial Officer

 2014      592,310        947,400     236,729      563,098    131,796      84,193        2,555,526  
 2013      560,578        558,180     159,340      612,198    172,147      80,723        2,143,166  

Name and

Principal Position

 

Fiscal

Year

 Salary(1) Bonus 

Stock

Awards(2)

 

Option

Awards(2)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compensation(3)

 

Change in

Pension Value

and Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings(4)

 

All

Other

Compen-
sation(5)

 Total

Ernie Herrman(6)

 

 2018

 

 $ 1,619,232

 

 

 

 $  9,000,001

 

  

 

$ 618,910

 

 

 

 $ 3,069,753

 

 $ 1,286,199

 

 $ 1,286,076   

 

 $ 16,880,171

 

Chief Executive

Officer and President

 2017

 

     1,525,001

 

 

 

     9,000,025

 

  

 

    613,574

 

 

 

     5,036,974

 

       793,306

 

 1,567,986

 

   18,536,866

 

 2016     1,382,309    14,106,551      527,072      3,614,627       160,103   390,093   20,180,755

Scott Goldenberg

 

 2018

 

       905,770

 

 

 

     3,068,400

 

  

 

    279,813

 

 

 

         962,645

 

       483,738

 

   133,767

 

     5,834,133

 

SEVP, Chief

Financial Officer

 2017

 

       813,462

 

 

 

     2,751,700

 

  

 

    277,323

 

 

 

     1,293,405

 

       374,162

 

   245,798

 

     5,755,850

 

 2016       738,463      2,101,500      285,546      1,151,396       131,427   226,875     4,635,207

Carol Meyrowitz(7)

 

 2018

 

     1,053,846

 

 

 

     5,000,035

 

  

 

 

 

 

     3,040,563

 

     4,217,594

 

     43,190

 

   13,355,228

 

Executive

Chairman

 2017

 

     1,000,002

 

 

 

     5,000,075

 

  

 

 

 

 

     4,226,712

 

     4,232,666

 

     43,514

 

   14,502,969

 

 2016     1,575,002    10,000,030      631,618      5,706,608     1,597,465     48,974   19,559,697

Michael MacMillan(8)

 

 2018

 

     1,114,648

 

 

 

     3,068,400

 

  

 

    279,813

 

 

 

     1,280,382

 

       213,073

 

   260,891

 

     6,217,207

 

SEVP, Group

President

 2017

 

     1,052,309

 

 

 

     3,144,800

 

  

 

    277,323

 

 

 

     1,730,730

 

       413,079

 

   562,149

 

     7,180,390

 

 2016     1,003,847      2,802,000      285,546      1,613,318       185,561 1,182,833     7,073,105

Richard Sherr

 

 2018

 

     1,070,195

 

 

 

     3,068,400

 

  

 

    322,773

 

 

 

     1,027,233

 

       563,104

 

   150,210

 

     6,201,915

 

SEVP, Group

President

 2017

 

       921,232

 

 

 

     3,144,800

 

  

 

    319,955

 

 

 

     1,393,079

 

       410,892

 

   272,812

 

     6,462,770

 

 2016       855,540      3,511,600      329,420      1,313,292         90,222   256,620     6,356,694

 

(1)Reflects salary earned during the fiscal year, including any salary adjustments made during the fiscal year. Fiscal 20132018 was a53-week year. Fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 were 52-week years.

 

(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of stock and option awards.awards, determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding the effects of estimated forfeitures. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note IH to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2015.2018.

 

(3)Reflects amounts earned under both MIP and LRPIP. For fiscal 2015,2018, MIP amounts were: Mr. Herrman, $1,734,683; Mr. Goldenberg, $355,795; Ms. Meyrowitz, $2,826,026; Mr. Herrman, $1,588,187;$1,128,986; Mr. MacMillan, $474,053;$430,792; and Mr. Sherr, $501,756 and Mr. Goldenberg, $436,499.$420,383. For the fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP cycle, for fiscal 2013-2015, the amounts were: Mr. Herrman, $1,335,070; Mr. Goldenberg, $606,850; Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,756,860; Mr. Herrman, $1,380,390;$1,911,577; Mr. MacMillan, $878,430;$849,590; and Mr. Sherr, $501,960 and Mr. Goldenberg, $376,470.$606,850. Amounts earned were paid in 2015calendar 2018 following the ECC’s certification of performance results.

 

(4)

Reflects the change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit obligations under our broad-based retirementpension plan and our SERP. Under SEC rules, these pension values reflect actuarial assumptions described underPension Benefits,, below. For fiscal 2015, the change in our named executive officers’ pension values over fiscal 2014 was primarily driven by lower interest rate assumptions (due to the low interest rate environment at the end of fiscal 2015) and new mortality assumptions (in light of new mortality

tables issued by the Society of Actuaries). In particular, approximately 61% of the fiscal 2015 change in pension value for Ms. Meyrowitz was due to these changes in interest rate and mortality assumptions. Refer toPension Benefits, below, for more information. Our named executive officersNEOs did not receive above-market or preferential earnings onnon-tax qualified deferred compensation.

 

(5)The table below provides additional details about the amounts listed under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2015.2018. Perquisites and other personal benefits are valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost to the Company.company.

 

  

Automobile

Benefit

  

Reimbursement

for Financial
Planning and
Legal Services

  

Employer

Contributions or

Credits Under

Savings Plans(a)

  

Company Paid
Amounts for
Life

Insurance(b)

  

Expatriate-
Related
Expenses(c)

  

Tax
Equalization(c)

  

Total

All Other

Compensation

 

  Carol Meyrowitz

  $35,904    $3,585    $3,484    $1,041            $44,014  

  Ernie Herrman

  35,904    1,500    323,424    1,041            361,869  

  Michael MacMillan

  35,578    –      235,501    1,041    $1,010,739    $697,385    1,980,244  

  Richard Sherr

  35,904    1,500    199,213    1,041            237,658  

  Scott Goldenberg

  35,904    1,500    140,319    1,041            178,764  

2018 Proxy Statement    43


LOGO

Name

 

Automobile

Benefit

  

Reimbursement

for Financial

Planning

Services

  

Employer

Contributions

or Credits

Under Savings

Plans(a)

  

Company

Paid

Amounts for

Insurance/

Health(b)

  

Expatriate-

Related

Expenses(c)

  

Total All

Other

Compensation

 

Ernie Herrman

  $ 36,594   $ 1,500   $ 1,246,941   $ 1,041      $ 1,286,076 

Scott Goldenberg

  36,594   1,500   94,632   1,041      133,767 

Carol Meyrowitz

  36,594   1,500   4,055   1,041      43,190 

Michael MacMillan

  37,756      87,877   6,178   129,080   260,891 

Richard Sherr

  36,594   1,500   111,075   1,041      150,210 

 

 (a)Reflects matching contributions under our 401(k) plan as well as, for Mr. Herrman, Mr. MacMillan, Mr. Sherr and Mr. Goldenberg,each NEO, matching credits under our ESP.ESP for each NEO (other than Ms. Meyrowitz), matching credits under our CESP and broad-based Canadian retirement savings program for Mr. MacMillan, and additional performance-based company credits under our ESP for Mr. Herrman. More information about ESP and CESP company credits can be found above in the Deferred Compensation section of the CD&A and under Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans below.

 

 (b)Reflects company-paid amounts under our U.S. management life insurance program, or,plus, for Mr. Herrman, paymentMacMillan, company-paid amounts under our life, AD&D, and long-term disability insurance programs and executive health assessment program in lieu of participation in that program.Canada.

 

 (c)Reflects expenses pursuant to our global mobility program in connection with Mr. MacMillan’s assignment with TJX Europe during fiscal 2015 after his relocation from the U.S. to the U.K. during fiscal 2013.prior international assignments. Amounts listed under Expatriate-Related Expenses include a U.K. housing allowance ($395,858), a goods and services allowance, and administrative and living expenses, as well as tax reimbursement in connection with such benefits ($497,663). Mr. MacMillan was also eligible for expatriate coverage under our medical plans, but was not eligible for payments for any loss on the sale of his home. Amounts listed under Tax Equalization reflect estimated net amounts payable under our tax equalization policy arising from additional taxes payable in respect of Mr. MacMillan’s compensation as a result of his relocation toprior international assignments ($108,625), plus administrative costs under our global mobility program, including the U.K. and prior relocation from Canada.cost of tax assistance services. The policies in our global mobility program are designed to enable us to relocate talent where needed throughout our global business.

 

(6)Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awardsMr. Herrman has served as Chief Executive Officer and total compensation reported above includePresident since the grant date valuebeginning of the following awards: for fiscal 2015, 250,000 shares of a2017 and served as President during fiscal 2016 MIP-based stock award; for fiscal 2014, 240,000 shares of a fiscal 2015 MIP-based stock award, including the value of accrued dividends from the date the ECC awarded the shares to the grant date for accounting purposes; and for fiscal 2013, 240,000 shares of a fiscal 2014 MIP-based stock award. These stock awards contained service and performance conditions for the related fiscal year and were intended by the ECC as compensation for that fiscal year. Under SEC rules these stock award values are reported in the Summary Compensation Table by grant date as determined for accounting purposes. Refer to the CEO Pay for Performance chart on page 17 ofCompensation Discussion and Analysis, above, to see the grant date value of stock awards attributed to the fiscal year of the respective service and performance conditions.

(7)2016. Mr. Herrman’s stock awards and total compensation reported above for fiscal 2016 include the grant date value of the following awards: for fiscal 2015, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2015-2017 LRPIP-basedperformance-based restricted stock award; for fiscal 2014, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2014-2016 LRPIP-based stock award; for fiscal 2013, 130,000 shares of a fiscal 2013-2015 LRPIP-based stock award, plus a fiscal 2013 MIP-based stock award and a fiscal 2014 MIP-based stockunit (career shares) award of 25,00070,186 shares each.granted in connection with Mr. Herrman’s transition to CEO and scheduled to vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026 withpro-rated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to continued employment with the company.

(7)Ms. Meyrowitz served as Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 2016. Since the beginning of fiscal 2017, Ms. Meyrowitz has served as Executive Chairman of the Board and as an active and integral member of our executive management team. For more information, refer to p. 29 in the CD&A.

 

(8)Amounts received byFor Mr. MacMillan, that wereamounts paid in U.K. pounds sterling were converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars at the average annual exchange rate of $1.6364$1.3021 per pound for fiscal 2015; $1.56932018, $1.3391 per pound for fiscal 2014;2017, and $1.5888$1.5225 per pound for fiscal 2013. Amounts received by Mr. MacMillan that were2016 and amounts denominated and paid in Canadian dollars were converted to U.S. Dollarsdollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.9628$0.7753 per Canadian dollar for fiscal 2014.2018. Under his employment agreement, Mr. MacMillan is eligible to receive certain cash benefits (otherwise denominated in U.S. dollars) in Canadian dollars. Mr. MacMillan is retiring from TJX, with a scheduled retirement date in April 2018.

Our named executive officersNEOs were entitled under their employment agreements to participate in our SIP, MIP and LRPIP and received cash incentives and equity incentives only pursuant to these plans during fiscal 2015.2018. The employment agreements with Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreement providesMeyrowitz and Mr. Herrman provide for target award opportunities during the term of the agreement of at least 150% of hertheir respective base salarysalaries for MIP and at least 100% of hertheir respective base salarysalaries for LRPIP, payment of reasonable fees of her legal and financial advisors incurred in negotiating her agreementtheir agreements and an automobile allowance commensurate with her position. In connection with entering into her newtheir positions. These employment agreement, on January 30, 2015 Ms. Meyrowitz received 250,000 shares ofagreements also provided for performance-based restricted stock with service and performance conditions relating toawards during fiscal 2016. Mr. MacMillan’s agreement provides2016 for specified vacation/holiday benefits and benefits under our global mobility policieseach executive in connection with our CEO transition and, starting in fiscal 2017, annual performance-based stock awards for Ms. Meyrowitz during the term of the agreement as described in the CD&A on p. 41. Under his assignment with TJX Europe.employment agreement, Mr. MacMillan also remains entitled towas eligible for the company’s executive life insurance program and for any remaining benefits in connection with his prior relocation to the U.S. from TJX Canada,international assignments, including service credit for vesting purposes, supplemental amounts under our ESP, and applicable tax equalization benefits.benefits, and also was eligible to receive certain cash benefits (otherwise denominated in U.S. dollars) in Canadian dollars.

In fiscal 2015, all of our named executive officers participated in our alternative SERP benefit except Ms. Meyrowitz, who participated in our primary SERP benefit. All of our named executive officers participatedNEOs were eligible to participate in ourtax-qualified defined benefit plan and were eligible to make deferrals to our 401(k) plan and our ESP.ESP for all or part of fiscal 2018. All of our named executive officersNEOs except Ms. Meyrowitz received matching credits under the ESP and were eligible to participate in our alternative SERP benefit for all or part of fiscal 2018. Mr. Herrman received additional performance-based company credits for fiscal 2018 under our ESP in connection with his employment agreement that became effective at the time of his transition to CEO, as described in the CD&A on p. 40. Ms. Meyrowitz participated in our primary SERP benefit. Mr. MacMillan was also eligible to participate in Canada-based retirement and savings programs, including the CESP, during fiscal 2015.2018. Our named executive officersNEOs were also entitled to receive an automobile benefit and to participate in fringe benefit plans and programs made available to executives generally.

generally (including Canada-based benefits for Mr. MacMillan).

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 201544    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN FISCAL 2018

The following table reports potential payouts under our cash incentive plans and all other stock and option awards that were granted during fiscal 20152018 to our named executive officers:NEOs:

 

Name and

Award Type

 

Grant

Date

 Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards($)(1)
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(#)
 

All
Other

Stock

Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units

 

All Other

Option

Awards:
Number  of
Securities
Under-
lying
Options(#)

  

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

Awards($)(2)

  

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock

and Option

Awards($)(3)

  

Grant

Date

 

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive Plan

Awards($)(1)

 

     

Estimated Future Payouts

Under

Equity Incentive Plan

Awards(#)

 

 

All

Other

Stock

Awards:

Number

of

Shares

of

Stock

or

Units

 

  

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Under-

lying

Options(#)

 

  

Exercise

or

Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($)(2)

 

  

Grant
Date

Fair Value
of

Stock and

Option

Awards

($)(3)

 

 
 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

   

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

   

Threshold

 

 

Target

 

 

Maximum

 

 

Carol Meyrowitz

                

Ernie Herrman

                        

MIP(4)

       $2,362,503   $4,725,006                  $ 2,428,848  $ 4,857,696         

LRPIP(5)

        1,575,000    3,150,000                  1,600,000  3,200,000         

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             53,000   $59.70   $636,000   9/14/17          43,220  $ 73.21  $618,910 

Stock Awards(6)

 1/30/2015              250,000                16,485,000   4/4/17             117,325         9,000,001 

Ernie Herrman

                

Scott Goldenberg

            

MIP(4)

     498,173  996,347         

LRPIP(5)

     500,000  1,000,000         

Stock Options

 9/14/17          19,540  73.21  279,813 

Stock Awards(6)

 4/4/17             40,000         3,068,400 

Carol Meyrowitz

            

MIP(4)

        1,327,693    2,655,387                  1,580,770  3,161,539         

LRPIP(5)

        1,100,000    2,200,000                  1,040,000  2,080,000         

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             44,230    59.70    530,760                  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014              130,000                7,954,700   4/4/17             65,181         5,000,035 

Michael MacMillan

                            

MIP(4)

        529,270    1,058,539                  603,181  1,206,363         

LRPIP(5)

        700,000    1,400,000                  700,000  1,400,000         

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             23,960    59.70    287,520   9/14/17          19,540  73.21  279,813 

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014              40,000                2,447,600   4/4/17             40,000         3,068,400 

Richard Sherr

                            

MIP(4)

        446,770    893,539                  588,607  1,177,214         

LRPIP(5)

        500,000    1,000,000                  700,000  1,400,000         

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             27,640    59.70    331,680   9/14/17          22,540  73.21  322,773 

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014              35,000                2,141,650   4/4/17             40,000         3,068,400 

Scott Goldenberg

                

MIP(4)

        364,905    729,810             

LRPIP(5)

        500,000    1,000,000             

Stock Options

 9/10/2014             23,960    59.70    287,520  

Stock Awards(6)

 4/01/2014              30,000                1,835,700  

 

(1)Non-Equity Incentive Plan amounts above reflect short-term cash incentives granted under our MIP and long-term cash incentives granted under our LRPIP. Our MIP and LRPIP are discussed above inCompensation Discussion and Analysis. the CD&A.

 

(2)All option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant.

 

(3)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair market value of stock and option awards on the grant date.awards. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date.date, $76.71. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note IH to our consolidated financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2015.2018.

 

(4)Reflects award opportunities under the fiscal 20152018 MIP. Actual amounts earned under the fiscal 20152018 MIP awards are discloseddiscussed in the CD&A and footnote 3 to the Summary Compensation Table. CAD-denominated amounts for Mr. MacMillan are converted from Canadian dollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.7753 per Canadian dollar.

 

(5)Reflects award opportunities under the fiscal 2015-20172018-2020 LRPIP cycle.cycle discussed on p. 37 in the CD&A.

 

(6)Reflects performance-based restricteddeferred stock awards granted under SIP discussed on p. 35 in the SIP or, for Mr. MacMillan, a performance-based deferred stock award granted under the SIP.CD&A.

2018 Proxy Statement    45


LOGO

In fiscal 2015,2018, we granted all equity incentives, including stock options and performance-based stock awards, under our SIP. StockOur stock options have a maximum term of ten years from the grant date and generally vest in equal annual installments over three years upon a change of control and in the event of certain terminations of employment. In the event a named executive officer’san NEO’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, or retirement at or after age 65 with five or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for up to five years following termination, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. Following a retirement at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or a retirement at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for five years following termination and unvested options continue to vest for the three-year period following retirement on the same basis as if the named executive officerNEO had not retired and generally remain exercisable for five years following retirement, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. In the event of any other termination, other than a termination for cause, vested options for our named executive officersNEOs generally remain exercisable for up to six months following termination (as specified under the terms of the option), unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. All options, whether or not then vested, are forfeited on a termination for cause.

The performance-based stock awards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except thatconditions. For performance-based stock awards fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability. For stock awardedgranted to our named executive officersNEOs in fiscal 2015,2018, the service-based conditions are satisfied by continuous employment through the scheduled vesting dateone or more specified dates or in the event of certain terminations of employment (as described below) and the performance-based conditions are tied to achievement of the corporatetargeted cumulativepre-tax income performance target under our MIP orfor the fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP cycle, as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis, with full vesting subject to achievement of a payout of at least 67% of the target payout under the applicable plan. If the payout is less than 67% for the performance period, a prorated portion of the CD&A on p. 39. The unvested award will be forfeited. If no payout is achieved forforfeited in whole or in part if achievement is below the performance period, the entire unvested award will be forfeited.specified vesting level. When a participant’s performance-based stock award vests, the participant is entitled to any dividends (or dividend equivalents) for the restricted period.

46    The TJX Companies, Inc.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2015 Year End


LOGO

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2018YEAR-END

The following table provides information on outstanding option and stock awards held as of January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 by our named executive officers:NEOs:

 

  Option Awards    Stock Awards 
Name 

Number of

Securities
Underlying
Unexercised

Options
Exercisable(#)(1)

  

Number of Securities
Underlying
Unexercised Options

Unexercisable(#)(1)

  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned

Options

 

Option
Exercise

Price ($)

  Option
Expiration
Date
    Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(#)(3)
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested($)(2)(3)
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards:
 
         

Number of

Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested(#)(3)

  Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested($)(2)(3)
 
                                   

Carol Meyrowitz

  

 
 11,383   0  $18.870  9/17/19 
 116,546   0   20.565  9/09/20 
 108,320   0   26.555  9/07/21 
 42,454   21,226   45.170  9/20/22 
 18,595   37,186   56.720  9/19/23 
 0   53,000   59.700  9/10/24 
  240,000  $15,825,600   250,000  $16,485,000  
                                   

Ernie Herrman

  

 
 91,560   0   20.565  9/09/20 
 90,380   0   26.555  9/07/21 
 35,427   17,713   45.170  9/20/22 
 15,518   31,034   56.720  9/19/23 
 0   44,230   59.700  9/10/24 
  130,000   8,572,200   260,000   17,144,400  
                                   

Michael MacMillan

  

 
 16,320   0   26.555  9/07/21 
 9,597   9,596   45.170  9/20/22 
 8,404   16,808   56.720  9/19/23 
 0   23,960   59.700  9/10/24 
  40,000   2,637,600   80,000   5,275,200  
                                   

Richard Sherr

  

 
 0   9,596   45.170  9/20/22 
 8,404   16,808   56.720  9/19/23 
 0   27,640   59.700  9/10/24 
  30,000   1,978,200   65,000   4,286,100  
                                   

Scott Goldenberg

  

 
 5,026   0   26.555  9/07/21 
 10,334   5,166   45.170  9/20/22 
 6,468   12,936   56.720  9/19/23 
 0   23,960   59.700  9/10/24 
  14,000   923,160   50,000   3,297,000  
                                   
  

Option Awards

 

     

Stock Awards

 

 

  Name

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)(1)

 

  

Number of

Securities

Underling

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)(1)

 

  

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

 

  

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

  

Option

Expiration

Date

 

     

Number
of

Shares
or

Units of
Stock

That
Have
Not

Vested

(#)(3)

 

  

Market
Value

of Shares or

Units of
Stock

That Have
Not

Vested

($)(2)(3)

 

  

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:

 

 
    

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Unearned

Options

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       



 

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other
Rights

That Have

Not
Vested

(#)(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

  



 

Market or

Payout
Value

of Unearned

Shares,
Units

or Other

Rights That

Have Not

Vested

($)(2)(3)

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Ernie

  Herrman

                                        
  53,140   0     $45.17   9/20/22      
  46,552   0      56.72   9/19/23      
  44,230   0      59.70   9/10/24      
  24,267   12,133      72.54   9/17/25      
  14,057   28,113      75.04   9/15/26      
  0   43,220      73.21   9/14/27      
                          200,186  $ 15,708,595   231,800  $18,189,346 

  Scott

  Goldenberg

          
  6,468   0      56.72   9/19/23      
  15,973   0      59.70   9/10/24      
  13,147   6,573      72.54   9/17/25      
  6,354   12,706      75.04   9/15/26      
  0   19,540      73.21   9/14/27      
                           30,000   2,354,100   75,000   5,885,250 

  Carol

  Meyrowitz

          
  108,320   0      26.555   9/07/21      
  17,666   0      59.70   9/10/24      
  29,080   14,540      72.54   9/17/25      
                          0   0   128,779   10,105,288 

  Michael

  MacMillan

          
  7,986   0      59.70   9/10/24      
  13,147   6,573      72.54   9/17/25      
  6,354   12,706      75.04   9/15/26      
  0   19,540      73.21   9/14/27      
                          40,000   3,138,800   80,000   6,277,600 

  Richard

  Sherr

          
  15,167   7,583      72.54   9/17/25      
  7,330   14,660      75.04   9/15/26      
  0   22,540      73.21   9/14/27      
                          40,000   3,138,800   80,000   6,277,600 

2018 Proxy Statement    47


LOGO

(1)All option awards have a ten-year maximum term of ten years from the grant date and vest in equal annual installments over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and upon certain employment terminations. Option awards granted prior to September 2015 vest upon a change of control. Option awards granted in or after September 2015 will vest upon a change of control and certainif the options are not continued or assumed in the transaction or in the event of a qualifying termination of employment terminations.following the change of control.

 

(2)Market values reflect the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 30, 2015February 2, 2018 (the last business day of fiscal 2015)2018), which was $65.94.$78.47.

(3)The stock awards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except thatas further described in the following table and under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control below. For performance-based stock awards granted since September 2015, performance conditions are deemed satisfied upon a change of control of TJX (with settlement of the award to the extent the original service conditions were satisfied) and the awards will vest in full upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control. Performance-based stock awards granted before September 2015 fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability.TJX. The following table shows the performance vesting conditions and scheduled vesting dates for our named executive officers’NEOs’ unvested performance-based stock awards as of January 31, 2015:February 3, 2018:

 

Name 

Number of

Unvested Shares


Shares/Units
  

Performance

Conditions(a)

 Vesting Date(b)
   

Carol Meyrowitz  Ernie Herrman

130,000Fiscal2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
 240,000114,475 Fiscal 2015 MIP (Corporate)2017-19 LRPIP3/03/154/19(c)
 250,000117,325 Fiscal 2016 MIP (Corporate)2018-20 LRPIP3/16(c)20(c)
   70,186  Fiscal 2017 MIP (Corporate)

Prorated annual vesting

beginning 2/01/20(d)

   

Ernie Herrman  Scott Goldenberg

30,000Fiscal2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
 130,00035,000 Fiscal 2013-152017-19 LRPIP4/15/15
 130,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
130,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/1719(c)
   40,000  Fiscal2018-20 LRPIP3/20(c)
   

Michael MacMillan  Carol Meyrowitz

 40,00063,598 Fiscal 2013-152017-19 LRPIP4/15/15
 40,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
40,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/1719(c)
   65,181  Fiscal2018-20 LRPIP3/20(c)
   

Richard Sherr  Michael MacMillan

40,000Fiscal2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
 30,00040,000 Fiscal 2013-152017-19 LRPIP4/15/15
 30,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
35,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/1719(c)
   40,000  Fiscal2018-20 LRPIP3/20(c)
   

Scott Goldenberg  Richard Sherr

40,000Fiscal2016-18 LRPIP4/15/18
 14,00040,000 Fiscal 2013-152017-19 LRPIP4/15/15
 20,000Fiscal 2014-16 LRPIP4/15/16
30,000Fiscal 2015-17 LRPIP4/15/1719(c)
   40,000  Fiscal2018-20 LRPIP 3/20(c)

 (a)Performance-based vesting conditions will be satisfied if performance under the applicable plan, as certified by the ECC, results in a payoutpayment of at least 67% of the target award payout for the performance period. If the payout is less than 67% for the performance period, a prorated portion of the unvested award will be forfeited. If no payout is achieved for the performance period, the entire unvested award will be forfeited.

 

 (b)Each of Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awards has service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the end of the fiscal year immediately preceding the vesting date or earlier involuntary termination. Each otherLRPIP-based performance-based stock award shown above has service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the last day of the three-year performance period or, for fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based stock awards, through the vesting date. StockPerformance-based stock awards scheduled to vest in April 2016 and April 2017 willmay also accelerate or remain outstanding and eligible to vest (prorated, if applicable, based on years completed in the LRPIP cycle) in the event of a termination due to death or disability (and,(or, for Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, involuntary termination) prior to the scheduled vesting date.date, as described further under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control below. Fiscal 2017-2019 LRPIP-based stock awards and fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP based-stock awards will also remain outstanding and eligible to vest upon retirement at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or retirement at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, prior to the scheduled vesting date, as described further under Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control below.

 

 (c)Expected date of ECC certification of the applicable performance results, which typically occurs in March or April after the end of the performance cycle.

(d)Mr. Herrman’s performance-based career shares, granted in fiscal 2016 MIP performance results.in connection with his transition to Chief Executive Officer, are restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest in full at the end of fiscal 2026 withpro-rated annual vesting beginning at the end of fiscal 2020, subject to his continued employment with TJX.

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested during Fiscal 2015

48    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK AWARDS VESTED DURING FISCAL 2018

The following table provides information relating to option exercises and performance-based stock award vesting for our named executive officersNEOs during fiscal 2015.2018:

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards  Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name  

Number of Shares

Acquired on Exercise(#)

  

Value Realized

on Exercise($)(1)

   

Number of Shares

Acquired on Vesting(#)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting($)(2)

  

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Exercise(#)

 

Value Realized

on Exercise($)(1)

 

Number of Shares

Acquired on

Vesting(#)

 

Value Realized

on Vesting($)(2)

 
            

Ernie Herrman

 70,380  $  3,695,090  130,000  $   9,985,300 

Scott Goldenberg

 0  0 30,000  2,304,300 

Carol Meyrowitz

52,123$2,197,545   240,000  $14,769,600   91,115  1,905,345  140,371  11,005,086 

Ernie Herrman

42,346 1,721,087   135,000   8,193,500  

Michael MacMillan

    30,000   1,834,500   16,391  333,547  40,000  3,072,400 

Richard Sherr

22,017 555,723   20,000   1,223,000   9,213  116,913  40,000  3,072,400 

Scott Goldenberg

    7,000   428,050  

 

(1)Represents the stock price on the NYSE at exercise minus the option exercise price multiplied by the number of shares acquired on exercise.

(2)Represents the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, calculated as the closing stock price on the NYSE on the vesting date (or the previous business day if vesting occurred onduring a weekend) multiplied by the number of shares vesting.

Pension Benefits

PENSION BENEFITS

In the U.S., we have atax-qualified defined benefit plan, or Retirement Plan, and a nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. We do not have a policy of granting extra years of credited service for purposes of these plans. Our Retirement Plan was closed to new hires as of February 1, 2006, although participants employed prior to that date continue to accrue benefits. We have not offered primary SERP benefits to any new participants in many years and do not currently intend to do so in the future, although we continue to offer an alternative SERP benefit.benefit to eligible participants whose Retirement Plan benefits are affected by certain limitations, as described below.

Under our Retirement Plan, participants accrue a benefit payable as an annuity at retirement. Once participation commenceshas commenced, after an initialone-year eligibility period, the amount accrued each year, expressed as a life annuity commencing at age 65, is 1% of eligible compensation (base salary and MIP awards) up to a periodically adjusted limit ($116,000128,000 in calendar 20152018 and $111,000$124,000 in calendar 2014)2017) and 1.4% of eligible compensation in excess of that limit. For years of service in excess of 35, the accrual rate is 1% per year of eligible compensation. Compensation for any year in excess of another periodically adjusted limit, currently $265,000,$275,000, is disregarded for these purposes. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental credits. Benefits under the Retirement Plan generally vest after five years of vesting service. A vested participant who retires or whose employment terminates prior to age 65 with at least ten years of vesting service may elect to receive a reduced annuity benefit commencing at age 55 or later. If the participant dies before commencing his or her benefit, apre-retirement death benefit is payable to the participant’s surviving spouse.

Under our SERP, the primary benefit provides participants who retire at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service a benefit equal to the value of an annuity commencing at age 65 providing annual payments up to a maximum of 50% of the participant’s final average earnings, less other employer-provided retirement benefits and social security benefits. The primary SERP benefit is adjusted for interest for participants who retire after age 65. Ms. Meyrowitz is the only one of our named executive officersNEOs eligible for a SERP primary benefit and has accrued the full benefit except for any increases related to final average earnings. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz is entitled to specified interest rate averaging assumptions if more favorable than her primary benefit under existing SERP terms. In determining final average earnings, the primary SERP includes base salary and MIP, but not LRPIP, and uses the highest average of five years over the preceding ten years. The alternative SERP benefit provides participants whose Retirement Plan benefits are affected by Internal Revenue Code benefit restrictionslimitations with the amount of the benefits lost by reason of those restrictions.limitations. Participants who are eligible for the primary benefit are eligible to receive the alternative benefit in lieu of the primary benefit if it provides a greater benefit at the time of retirement or other termination of employment.

2018 Proxy Statement    49


LOGO

Benefits under SERP are payable following retirement or other termination of employment in installments or in certain other forms of actuarially equivalent value, including a lump sum. If the participant dies prior to retirement or other termination of employment, apre-retirement death benefit is payable to the participant’s surviving spouse.

Pension Benefits for Fiscal 2015PENSION BENEFITS FOR FISCAL 2018

The following table provides information on pension benefits for our named executive officersNEOs eligible for these benefits as of January 31, 2015.February 3, 2018. All of our named executive officersNEOs are fully vested in their Retirement Plan and SERP benefits.

 

Name                  Plan Name                   Number of Years of
Credited Service(1)
  

Present

Value of

        Accumulated        

Benefit(2)

   

Payments

    Made During    

Last Fiscal

Year

  Plan Name  

Number of

Years of

Credited

Service(1)

  

Present Value of

Accumulated

Benefit(2)

  

Payments Made

During Last Fiscal

Year

Carol Meyrowitz

  Retirement Plan
SERP (Primary)
  28   $    763,090    
  20   26,512,949    
            

Ernie Herrman

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
25 520,493    Retirement Plan  28   $670,268    —  
25 2,406,099    SERP (Alternative)  28   4,495,932    —  

Scott Goldenberg

  Retirement Plan  25   799,888    —  
  SERP (Alternative)  25   1,532,791    —  

Carol Meyrowitz

  Retirement Plan  31   977,840    —  
              SERP (Primary)  20    36,345,924    —  

Michael MacMillan

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
10 237,345    Retirement Plan  12   335,611    —  
10 1,134,491    SERP (Alternative)  12   1,847,938    —  
            

Richard Sherr

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
22 585,889    Retirement Plan  25   755,010    —  
22 1,200,108    SERP (Alternative)  25   2,095,205    —  
            

Scott Goldenberg

Retirement Plan
SERP (Alternative)
22 614,351  
22 729,001  
            

(1)Participants in our Retirement Plan and our alternative SERP benefit program began to accrue credited service upon participation in the plans, generally after one year of service with TJX. Participants underService credited for purposes of our primary SERP benefit began to accrue creditedis based on years of service immediately and are eligible to be creditedwith TJX but with a maximum of 20 years of service.

 

(2)Under SEC rules, for purposes of calculating the present value of the accumulated pension benefits in the Pension Benefits table we assumed that each named executive officerNEO commences his or her benefit at age 65 (or current age, if older than 65) and we used the same assumptions used and described in Note JI to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2015,2018, including a post-retirement mortality assumption based on the sex distinctRP-2014 Tables projected generationally with Scale BB-2DMP-2017 from 2006. For our SERP, consistent with the assumptions used to determine the values in our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2018, the present value of accumulated benefits assumes payment forms consistent with executive elections and has been converted to the applicable payment forms using IRS-prescribed mortality assumptions and an interest rate of 2.41% for the primary SERP benefit and 3.30% for the alternative SERP benefit. Actual amounts payable to our named executive officersNEOs under our Retirement Plan and SERP would be determined based on the governing terms (including actuarial assumptions and form and timing of benefit payments) specified in our plans and agreements, which are not the same as, and could produce benefit values higher than those produced by, the assumptions used for purposes of the values reported in the Pension Benefits table or Summary Compensation Table.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

We have an Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan available to key employees and our directors. Under the ESP, our named executive officersNEOs and other eligible Associates can elect to defer up to 20% of base salary and up to 100% of any MIP and LRPIP awards and our directors can elect to defer annual retainers. Our named executive officersNEOs (other than Ms. Meyrowitz) were eligible during all or a portion of fiscal 20152018 to receive matching credits on base salary deferrals of up to 10% of base salary, with an enhanced level of matching credits generally based on the executive’s job level, age and/or pension eligibility for a period of up to 15 years. For calendar 2014,2017, the potential match for Senior Executive Vice Presidentsthese executives was 100% (or, for Mr. Herrman, 150%) of their eligible deferrals, plus, if our MIP performance resulted in a payout of between 90% and 125% (or higher) of the target corporate award opportunities for fiscal 2015,2018, an additional match ranging from 50% to 150% (or, for Mr. Herrman, ranging from 50% to 200%) of their eligible deferrals. Our named executive officers (other than Ms. Meyrowitz) earned thisNo additional performance-based match at 139.24%was earned based on fiscal 2015 corporate MIP results. For a portion of fiscal 2015, Mr. Goldenberg earned an ESP match at the Executive Vice President level equal to 20% of his eligible deferrals plus an additional performance-based match of 45.70% of his eligible deferrals based on fiscal 20152018 corporate MIP results. Matching employer credits are 50%100% vested after five years of plan participation and are 100% vested after ten years of plan participation, at age 55, or upon a change of control or separation from service by reason of death or disability. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental employer credits.

50    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

As of January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, all named executive officersNEOs with ESP employer credits were fully vested. For fiscal 2018, under his employment agreement, Mr. Herrman was eligible for additional performance-based employer credits and received the full credit of $1 million based on fiscal 2017 corporate MIP results as discussed above in the CD&A. All amounts deferred or credited to a participant’s account under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments available onselected by the market.participant. Although not required by the ESP, it has been our practice to purchase the investments notionally invested under the participants’ accounts to help meet our future obligations under the ESP.

Under the ESP, amounts deferred (and earnings on those amounts) are generally distributed following termination of employment unless the participant has elected an earlier distribution date, which may be no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. Vested employer matching credits (and earnings on those amounts) are generally distributed at, or on a deferred basis following, a participant’s separation from service. Distributions are generally made in a lump sum payment, but a participant may elect to be paid in annual installments over a period of not more than ten years. Amounts vested under the ESP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) can be distributed at the participant’s request prior to termination of employment in a lump sum distribution of 85% of the vested account, with the remaining 15% forfeited.

In connection with his prior service with TJX Canada, Mr. MacMillan participatedwas eligible to participate in the Canadian Executive Savings Plan, or CESP, a deferred compensation plan for eligible employees of TJX Canada. Under the CESP, participants can contribute a portion of their base earnings to a trust fund maintained in Canada and receive notional matching employer credits, including a performance-based match based on TJX Canada MIP results. Supplemental amounts may also be contributed or credited to CESP. CESP contributions are invested, and matching credits are notionally invested, in mutual funds or other market investments available onselected by the market.participant. Mr. MacMillan holds amounts previously deferred under the CESP but was notin connection with his prior service with TJX Canada, and again became eligible to make new contributions or receive matching credits under the CESPparticipate in this plan during fiscal 2015.2018 in connection with his move to Canada. Mr. MacMillan has a current right to his participant contributions to the CESP (and earnings on those amounts) and a right to employer matching credits (and earnings on those amounts) upon termination of employment. Distributions of matching credits are generally made in a lump sum or up to ten annual installments.

Through December 31, 2007, we offered eligible key employees and directors the opportunity to participate in the General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, another U.S. nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Ms. Meyrowitz is a vested participant in this plan. Under the GDCP, participants could defer all or a portion of base salary and MIP and LRPIP awards and,or, in the case of directors, retainers and meeting fees, which deferrals are credited with notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on an average yield of Treasury securities during the prior year. For calendar 2014,2017, this rate was 2.36%1.82%. No further deferrals were permitted beginning with fiscal 2009 compensation, but previously deferred amounts continue to be credited with notional interest amounts.

Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) that had not been distributed prior to January 1, 2009 are distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prior to that date)amounts) are distributed in a lump sum atduring employment or following termination of service as elected by the participant, or, for participants whose employment terminates at or after age 55, in a lump sum or in installments upon an event or at a date (no later thanfollowing termination as elected by the participant (with all payments completed by the tenth anniversary of termination of service) and in a lump sum or in monthly installments as elected by the participant.. Upon a change of control, each participant receives the entire amount credited to his deferred account in a lump sum payment.

2018 Proxy Statement    51

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2015


LOGO

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2018

The following table provides information on fiscal 20152018 nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our named executive officers:NEOs:

 

Name and

Plan Name

  Executive
Contributions
  in Last FY(1)  
   Registrant
Contributions

  in Last FY(2)  
   Aggregate
Earnings in

  Last FY(3)  
   Aggregate
Withdrawals/
  Distributions  
   Aggregate Balance at
  Last FYE(4)  
  

Executive

Contributions

in Last FY(1)

 

 

Registrant

Contributions

in Last FY(2)

 

 

Aggregate

Earnings

in Last FY(3)

 

 

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

 

 

Aggregate

Balance

at Last FYE(4)

 

 

Ernie Herrman

     

ESP

 $ 161,923  $ 1,242,885  $221,651     $6,925,286 

Scott Goldenberg

     

ESP

 90,577  90,577  508,570     3,451,270 

Carol Meyrowitz

               

GDCP

   –             –             $  14,269         –         $   617,381         12,017     657,276 

ESP

   $315,000     –                   159,580     –                 2,777,345   210,769      595,248      4,288,180 
     

Ernie Herrman

ESP

       132,770   $319,940   128,978   –       2,918,991  
     

Michael MacMillan

     

ESP

 96,231   232,017   208,569   –       2,235,975   16,308  16,308  523,920     3,818,584 

CESP(5)

 –           –           39,702   $697   365,061   46,682  54,362  101,471     483,202 
     

Richard Sherr

     

ESP

 121,846   195,729   166,706   –       2,884,737   192,635  107,020  610,428     4,758,181 
     

Scott Goldenberg

ESP

 66,346   136,835   132,967   –       1,884,379  
     

(1)Reflects notional credits to participant accounts.accounts in ESP or after-tax participant contributions to CESP. Amounts are also included as Salary orNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, as applicable, in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(2)Reflects notional credits to participant accounts. Amounts include the performance-based matching credits earned by Mr. Herrman under the ESP for fiscal 2015.2018 but not credited until after the close of fiscal 2018, and the performance-based credits earned by Mr. MacMillan under the CESP for fiscal 2018 but not credited until after the close of fiscal 2018. The amounts in this column are also included in All Other Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

(3)Reflects notional market-based earnings on deferrals and other amounts credited to the account of plan participants under the ESP, notional interest under the GDCP as described above, and earnings under the CESP as described above. It has been our practice to purchase the specified notional investments under the ESP to help meet our future obligations under the ESP.

 

(4)The aggregate balance includes deferrals of income for prior fiscal years. Amounts deferred by individuals who were named executive officersNEOs for the fiscal year of the deferral were included in the compensation reported for those individuals in the compensation tables in prior proxy statements. The aggregate balance also includes earnings on amounts deferred and performance-based matching credits earned under the ESP and the CESP for fiscal 20152018 but not credited until after the close of fiscal 2015.2018.

 

(5)CESP amounts for Mr. MacMillan are converted from Canadian dollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.8982$0.7753 per Canadian dollar.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

52    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

We believe that providing severance and change of control benefits helps us attract and retain high quality executives and protect our other business interests, as discussed further inCompensation Discussion and Analysis. the CD&A.

Potential Payments under our Employment Agreements. Each of our named executive officersNEOs in fiscal 20152018 was party to an employment agreement providing for payments in connection with the specified termination or change of control events, generally describedthe material terms of which are summarized below.

 

  

Termination Other than for Cause or Constructive Termination: If we terminate a named executive officer’san NEO’s employment other than for cause or the executive terminates employment in connection with a forced relocation of more than forty40 miles (a “constructive termination”)(referred to as a constructive termination), the executive would be entitled to twenty-four24 months (or, for Mr. Goldenberg, fifteen months) of continued base salary and any automobile allowance; cash payments during the same period in an amount sufficient after taxes to

cover the cost of any COBRA continuation of health benefits elected byduring the executive;salary continuation period (for executives other than Mr. MacMillan); cash incentive awards under MIP and LRPIP for each uncompleted year or award cycle, to the extent applicable performance goals are met and adjusted to reflect the executive’s period of service during the year or cycle; and equity awards in accordance with their terms (plus, forterms. In addition, both Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz are entitled to acceleration of outstanding and unvested stock options as provided under her agreement). Under his employment agreement, Mr. Herrman would also be entitledand to continued vesting of performance-based restrictedLRPIP-based stock awards granted in fiscal 2014 or later to the extent applicable performanceLRPIP goals are met and prorated,adjusted, if applicable, to reflect the executive’s period of service during the performance period (including, for Ms. Meyrowitz, service credit for the year in which termination occurs); salary continuation for Ms. Meyrowitz will continue to be based on her fiscal 2016 salary rate regardless of when termination occurs; and a constructive termination for Ms. Meyrowitz would also include a voluntary termination in connection with an involuntary removal or failure to be nominated or reelected to the completed portionBoard or as Chairman of the performance period. Under his new employment agreement (effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016), Mr. Goldenberg would be entitled to twenty-four months (instead of fifteen months) of salary continuation, automobile allowance, and health coverage-related payments described above.

Board.

 

  Death or Disability: Upon a termination of employment by reason of death or disability, each named executive officerNEO (or his or her legal representative) would be entitled to the same benefits as are described above, except that salary continuation would be subject to adjustment for any long-term disability benefits, and the MIP award would be paid at target without proration.proration, any stock option acceleration would be determined under the terms of the applicable award, and Mr. Herrman would be eligible for the additional performance-based credit under the ESP for the year of termination if applicable performance goals are met.

 

  Retirement or Voluntary Termination: Our named executive officersNEOs would not be entitled to these separation benefits upon a voluntary termination (other than a constructive termination), except that ifupon retirement or other voluntary termination (other than a constructive termination) Ms. Meyrowitz voluntarily terminates her employment with 90 days’ notice and prior to a change of control, she would be entitled to salary continuation, automobile allowance,benefits under LRPIP and health coverage-related payments on the same basis as if she had been involuntarily terminated without cause, as well as prorated LRPIP benefits for any full fiscal yearsLRPIP-based stock awards, in a cycle completed prioreach case to the dateextent applicable LRPIP goals are met and adjusted, if applicable, to reflect her period of termination.service during the performance period (including, in the case of LRPIP-based stock awards, service credit for the year in which termination occurs).

 

  End of Contract Term: For each of our named executive officers,NEOs a termination occurring on the last day of the agreement term would be treated as a termination other than for cause unless we make an offer of continued service in a comparable position or, for Ms. Meyrowitz, unless the parties mutually agree to continue her employment.position.

 

  Change of Control: Upon a change of control (with or without a termination of employment), each named executive officerNEO would be entitled to receive a lump sum settlement at target of MIP and LRPIP awards for which the performance period or cycle had not ended, plus any benefits (including any acceleration of awards) under the SIP and our deferred compensation plans.plans (as described further below). We would also be obligated to pay legal fees and expenses the named executive officerNEO reasonably incurs in seeking enforcement of contractual rights following a change of control.

The events that constitute a change of control under the agreements in effect during fiscal 2015 generally consist of the following, subject to the qualifications set forth in those agreements: (i) a change of control required to be reported under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; (ii)

The events that constitute a change of control under the agreements in effect during fiscal 2018 generally consist of the following, subject to the qualifications set forth in those agreements: a change of control required to be reported under the Exchange Act; the acquisition of 20% or more of our common stock followed by a change in a majority of our Board of Directors; (iii) a proxy solicitation or solicitations followed by a change in a majority of our Board of Directors; and (iv) the execution of certain agreements of acquisition, merger or consolidation followed by consummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreement.

2018 Proxy Statement    53


LOGO

 

  Change of Control Followed by Qualifying Termination: Upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change of control, each named executive officerNEO would be entitled to receive alternative severance benefits instead of the separation-related benefits described above. The alternative severance benefits consist of a lump sum severance payment equal to two times the sum of the executive’s annual base salary, any annual automobile allowance and target MIP award amount; and two years of continued participation in medicalhealth and life insurance programs, except to the extent of replacement coverage.coverage; and any benefits (including any acceleration of awards) under the SIP and our deferred compensation plans (as described further below). For this purpose, base salary and the target MIP amount would be determined by reference to the higher of the executive’s base salary immediately prior to termination or the change of control (except that base salary for Ms. Meyrowitz would continue to be based on her fiscal 2016 salary rate), and base salary would be adjusted for any long-term disability benefits. Ms. Meyrowitz would also be entitled to a lump sum payment of her vested SERP benefit determined, if more favorable to her, under actuarial assumptions specified in her agreement representing early commencement of her unreduced benefit.

A qualifying termination for these purposes includes a termination by us other than for cause, by the executive for good reason (as defined in the agreements), or a termination by reason of death or disability, in each case within 24 months following a change of control.control without regard to the scheduled term of the agreement. A qualifying termination does not include a voluntary termination without good reason.

In addition to the amounts described above, the executives would remain entitled to vested and accrued, but unpaid, compensation and benefits (including earned but unpaid amounts under MIP and LRPIP) and to any SIP or deferred compensation benefit asbenefits (as described below. We have reserved the right to determine the extent to whichbelow). Mr. MacMillan would be entitled toeligible for any compensation andremaining expatriate benefits under our global mobility programassociated with his prior international assignments following completion of his assignment with TJX Europe or a termination of employment. In connection with his move to Canada, Mr. MacMillan would be eligible under his employment agreement to receive certain cash benefits (otherwise denominated in U.S. dollars) in Canadian dollars and for any reason.continued coverage under TJX’s executive life insurance program. Our named executive officersNEOs would not be entitled to any taxgross-up payment for any “golden parachute” excise tax on change of control benefits, but payments and benefits to each executive would be reduced if and to the extent such a reduction would have put the executive in a betterafter-tax position.

Potential Acceleration or Continued Vesting of Unvested Equity Awards.Awards. Under the terms of awards granted under ourthe SIP, each of our named executive officers would be entitled to partial vesting of stock options upon a termination due to death or disability (foreach of our NEOs would be entitled to partial acceleration of stock options granted more than three months prior to the date of termination) and fulltermination; Mr. Herrman would be entitled to continued vesting of bothhis fiscal 2016-2018 LRPIP-based stock optionsaward to the extent applicable performance goals are met and acceleration of his other LRPIP-based stock awards upon a change of control.awards; Ms. Meyrowitz would also be entitled to fullacceleration of her stock awards; and each of our NEOs, other than Mr. Herrman and Ms. Meyrowitz, would be entitled to continued vesting of unvested stock awards upon termination of employment by reason of death or disability.to the extent applicable performance goals are met. In the event of a termination without cause or a constructive termination, Ms. Meyrowitz’s options vest in fullMr. Herrman and her stock awards remain subject to the satisfaction of the applicable performance conditions but applicable service-based conditions would be deemed satisfied. Each of the executives, other than Ms. Meyrowitz would be entitled to full acceleration of unvested stock options and continued vesting of LRPIP-based stock awards granted in April 2013 or later upon termination of employment by reason of death or disability (and, for Mr. Herrman, in the event of a termination without cause or a constructive termination), to the extent applicable performance goals are met and prorated, if applicable, based on the completed portion of the performance period.met. Following a termination of employment at the end of fiscal 2015,2018, each of the executives would have been able to exercise vested options in accordance with applicable post-termination exercise periodsperiods. Upon retirement at the end of fiscal 2018, Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Goldenberg, Mr. Sherr, and (upon an eligible retirement)Mr. MacMillan would have been eligible for continued vesting of outstanding options, in each case in accordance with the terms described above under the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table.

The following table, sets forthand for continued vesting of fiscal 2017-2019 LRPIP-based stock awards and fiscal 2018-2020 LRPIP-based stock awards to the aggregate estimated valueextent applicable goals are met. In each of these circumstances, the potential acceleration or continued vesting of unvested equityLRPIP-based stock awards held by each of our named executive officers assumingNEOs would be subject to proration, if applicable, based on the triggering events occurred on January 31, 2015, all pursuantrules described in footnote 3 to the table below. Similar terms of TJX’s plansapply to PSUs and each executive’s awards as in effect on such date. These amounts are also includedRSUs under our new compensation program for fiscal 2019 described above in the potential payment table below.CD&A.

As described in the CD&A, new equity awards granted in September 2015 or later do not include automatic full accelerated vesting upon a change of control of TJX. Instead, performance conditions for performance-based stock awards will be deemed satisfied upon the change of control (with settlement of the award to the extent the original service conditions were satisfied), and stock options and performance-based stock awards will vest in full upon the change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of

 

  Triggering Event(1) 
   Death/Disability(2)  Termination without Cause(3)  Change of Control(4) 
Name 

Option

      Awards      

  Stock
      Awards      
  Option
      Awards      
  Stock
      Awards      
  Option
      Awards      
  Stock
      Awards      
 

Carol Meyrowitz

 $266,496   $16,485,000   $1,114,439   $16,485,000   $1,114,439   $16,485,000  

Ernie Herrman

  222,402    8,690,717        8,690,717    930,028    26,131,950  

Michael MacMillan

  120,473    2,674,067            503,789    8,040,600  

Richard Sherr

  123,469    2,116,325            526,752    6,362,775  

Scott Goldenberg

  80,415    1,558,583            376,078    4,279,920  

54    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

 

(1)

For purposes of these estimates, we valued performance-based stock awards and stock options using $65.94, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on January 30, 2015, the last business day of the fiscal year. We included the full value of all accelerated performance-based stock awards ($65.94 per share), plus the value of any accumulated dividends that would have been paid upon the vesting of such awards, and the spread value ($65.94 per share minus the option exercise price) for all stock options that would have been accelerated upon a termination of employment (including by reason of death or disability) or change of control. We did not include any amounts in respect of outstanding equity awards that were earned based on service and performance as of January 31, 2015, or that would not have accelerated upon the triggering

employment following the change of control. A qualifying termination for these purposes includes an involuntary termination without cause or a termination for good reason within 24 months following the change of control. Equity awards granted before September 2015 vest in full upon a change of control of TJX.

event. See the Outstanding Equity Awards table for more information about these equity awards. We further assumed that each executive would satisfy his or her non-competition, non-solicitation, or confidentiality agreements with us following termination.Except as described above in connection with a change of control of TJX, Mr. Herrman’s performance-based career shares award is not eligible for acceleration or continued vesting in connection with any termination of employment.

(2)Assumes, for executives other than Ms. Meyrowitz, that the performance conditions applicable to the executives’ unvested stock awards granted in April 2013 or later would have been satisfied.

(3)Assumes that the performance conditions applicable to Ms. Meyrowitz’s unvested stock award and Mr. Herrman’s unvested stock award granted in April 2013 or later would have been satisfied.

(4)Assumes that all awards would have been cashed out at closing, and that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A).

Potential Acceleration of Unvested Deferred Compensation. As noted above underNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans,, any unvested employer credit accounts under the ESP also vest in full upon a change of control or termination of employment due to death or disability.disability, and any accounts under GDCP will be paid upon a change of control.

Related Provisions.Provisions. Each named executive officerNEO agreed tonon-solicitation andnon-competition provisions that operate during the term of employment and for twenty-four24 months thereafter, (or, in the case of Mr. Goldenberg’s non-competition provision, for fifteen months thereafter), and to confidentiality provisions during and after employment. Under his new employment agreement (effective at the beginning of fiscal 2016) Mr. Goldenberg’s non-competition provision operates for twenty-four months (instead of fifteen months) after employment. Benefits under the employment agreements and SERP, as well as benefits attributable to the enhanced employer match forcredits at or above the Senior Executive Vice PresidentsPresident level under the ESP (including Mr. Herrman’s additional performance-based credits), are also conditioned on compliance with restrictive covenants. Upon a change of control, our named executive officersNEOs would no longer be subject to any covenant not to compete following a termination of employment. In accordance

For LRPIP awards starting with TJX policy regarding expatriatethe fiscal 2019-2021 LRPIP cycle, under terms established by the ECC, NEOs and tax equalizationother LRPIP participants who retire at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or who retire at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, will be eligible for benefits TJX hasunder LRPIP to the discretionextent applicable LRPIP goals are met and adjusted, if applicable, to require repayment by Mr. MacMillanreflect the participant’s period of all or a portion of his assignment-relatedservice during the performance period. These LRPIP benefits if he resigns before completion of his assignmentare conditioned on compliance with TJX Europe, if his employment is terminated for cause, or if he fails to comply withapplicable restrictive covenants.

The agreements and plans include terms designed to comply with the deferred compensation provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A), including provisions that would delay certain termination-related benefits for six months beyond termination of employment and alternative payment provisions that could apply in connection with a change of control not described in Section 409A.

2018 Proxy Statement    55


LOGO

The following table sets forth aggregate estimated payment obligations to each of our named executive officers,NEOs, assuming that the triggering events had occurred on January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, all pursuant to the terms of TJX’s plans and each executive’s employment agreement as in effect on such date.

Triggering Event and Payments(1)

Triggering Event and Payments(1)

 C. Meyrowitz  E. Herrman  M. MacMillan  R. Sherr  S. Goldenberg 

Death/Disability

               

Severance

  $     3,150,000     $    2,680,000     $    1,940,000     $    1,640,000     $    843,750  

MIP/LRPIP(2)

    3,870,833      2,440,000      1,233,500      951,000      804,583  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

    16,751,496      8,913,119      2,794,540      2,239,794      1,638,998  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

    110,775      120,069      110,775      120,069      77,352  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total(4)

  $     23,833,104     $    14,153,188     $    6,078,815     $    4,950,863     $    3,364,683  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Voluntary Termination with 90 Days’ Notice

               

Severance

  $     3,150,000     $    —       $    —       $    —       $    —    

LRPIP(2)

    1,508,333      —        —        —        —    

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

    110,775      —        —        —        —    
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  $     4,769,108     $    —       $    —       $    —       $    —    
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination

               

Severance

  $     3,150,000     $    2,680,000     $    1,940,000     $    1,640,000     $    843,750  

MIP/LRPIP(2)

    1,508,333      1,100,000      700,000      500,000      433,333  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

    17,599,439      8,690,717      —        —        —    

Health, Life and/or Automobile Benefits

    110,775      120,069      110,775      120,069      77,352  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  $     22,368,547     $    12,590,786     $    2,750,775     $    2,260,069     $    1,354,435  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Change of Control

               

Settlement of MIP/LRPIP

  $     3,050,000     $    2,200,000     $    1,400,000     $    1,000,000     $    900,000  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(3)

    17,599,439      27,061,978      8,544,389      6,889,527      4,655,998  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  $     20,649,439     $    29,261,978     $    9,944,389     $    7,889,527     $    5,555,998  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination

               

Change of Control Benefits (see above)

  $     20,649,439     $    29,261,978     $    9,944,389     $    7,889,527     $    5,555,998  

Severance

    7,875,000      5,360,000      3,007,000      2,542,000      2,092,500  

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

    7,122,271      —        —        —        —    

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

    115,584      115,912      115,584      115,912      115,584  

Reduction to Maximize After-Tax Benefit(6)

    —        —        —        —        (1,058,184)  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total(4)

  $     35,762,294     $    34,737,890     $    13,066,973     $    10,547,439     $    6,705,898  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

   

Ernie

Herrman

  

Scott

Goldenberg

  

Carol

Meyrowitz

  

Michael

MacMillan

  

Richard

Sherr

 

Death/Disability

                    

Severance

 $3,200,000   $1,800,000  $3,150,000  $2,199,185  $2,100,000 

MIP/LRPIP(2)

  3,978,848    998,173   2,594,103   1,303,181   1,155,274 

Acceleration of Option Awards(3)

  75,517    36,597   32,884   36,597   42,222 

Acceleration or Continued Vesting of Stock Awards(3)

  19,812,355    5,374,500   8,566,873   6,455,533   6,455,533 

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

  145,113    124,909   124,909   74,491   124,909 

Total(4)

  27,211,833    8,334,179   14,468,769   10,068,987   9,877,938 

Retirement or Voluntary Termination

                    

LRPIP(2)

  —       1,013,333       

Continued Vesting of Option Awards(3)

  —    185,340   86,222   185,340   213,811 

Continued Vesting of Stock Awards(3)

  —    2,935,875   8,566,873   1,058,767   3,204,033 

Total

  —    3,121,215   9,666,428   1,244,107   3,417,844 

Termination without Cause/Constructive Termination

                    

Severance

  3,200,000    1,800,000   3,150,000   2,199,185   2,100,000 

MIP/LRPIP(2)

  1,550,000    500,000   1,013,333   700,000   566,667 

Acceleration of Option Awards(3)

  395,713       86,222       

Continued Vesting of Stock Awards(3)

  19,812,355       8,566,873       

Health, Life and/or Automobile Benefits

  145,113    124,909   124,909   74,491   124,909 

Total

  25,103,181    2,424,909   12,941,337   2,973,676   2,791,576 

Change of Control

                    

Settlement of MIP/LRPIP

  3,125,000    1,000,000   2,040,000   1,400,000   1,200,000 

Settlement or Acceleration of Stock Awards(3)

  10,567,375    5,374,500   8,566,873   6,455,533   6,455,533 

Total

  13,692,375    6,374,500   10,606,873   7,855,533   7,655,533 

Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination

                    

Change of Control Benefits (see above)

  13,692,375   6,374,500   10,606,873   7,855,533   7,655,533 

Acceleration of Option Awards(3)

  395,713   185,340   86,222   185,340   213,811 

Acceleration of Stock Awards(3)

  24,186,739   3,056,088   1,725,287   3,190,167   3,190,167 

Severance

  8,000,000   2,790,000   6,270,000   3,408,737   3,255,000 

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

        2,373,125       

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

  140,314   130,566   130,566   80,673   130,566 

Reduction to MaximizeAfter-Tax Benefit(6)

     (305,599         

Total(4)

  46,415,141   12,230,895   21,192,073   14,720,450   14,445,077 

56    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

 

(1)We used the following assumptions to calculate the payments set forth in the table:

 

We assumed in each case that the termination was not for cause; the executive does not violate his or hernon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, or other obligations to us following termination; the executive (other than Mr. MacMillan) receives COBRA continuation of medicalhealth coverage for up to 18 months (or, in the case of Mr. Goldenberg, up to 15 months) but does not receive medicalhealth or life insurance coverage from another employer within the relevant periods; and the executive does not incur legal fees requiring reimbursement from us. We also assumed that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A.

 

For health care benefits, we estimated an amount sufficient after taxes to cover the cost of continuation of medicalhealth coverage based on the COBRA rates in effect as of January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 and assumed, in the case of a qualifying termination following a change of control, that employee contributions for medicalhealth coverage will continue at rates in effect as of January 31, 2015.February 3, 2018.

 

In the case of payments following termination by reason of disability, the amounts shown assume salary continuation and/or long-term disability payments, coordinated to avoid duplication.

We valued performance-based stock awards and stock options using $78.47, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 2, 2018, the last business day of the fiscal year. For equity awards that would have accelerated or settled upon or continued vesting following the triggering event, we included the full value of all performance-based stock awards ($78.47 per share), plus the value of any accumulated dividends as of February 3, 2018 that would be payable upon the vesting of such awards, and the spread value ($78.47 per share minus the option exercise price) for allin-the-money stock options. See the Outstanding Equity Awards table on p. 47 for more information about these equity awards. Actual amounts that will be earned with respect to these equity awards may be different from the values included in the table.

In addition to the SERP enhancement described in footnote 5 of this table, our NEOs were eligible for benefits described above under Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

Amounts for Mr. MacMillan that are denominated in Canadian dollars are converted from Canadian dollars at the average annual exchange rate of $0.7753 per Canadian dollar.

We did not include any amounts in respect of accrued but unpaid base salary or benefits,benefits; any amounts in respect of bonuses under MIP and LRPIP for performance periods ending on January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 that were

earned but remained unpaid as of that datedate; any amounts in respect of stock options that were notin-the-money or outstanding equity awards that were earned based on service and performance as of February 3, 2018 or that would not have accelerated upon or continued vesting following the triggering event; or, for Mr. MacMillan, any remaining tax equalization benefits or other expatriate-related amounts under our global mobility program. For additional assumptions applicable to equity awards, seePotential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards, above. In addition to the SERP benefits described in footnote 5 of this table, our named executive officers were eligible for benefits described above underPension Benefits andNonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.

 

(2)The amount, for each executive, includes a prorated award for each LRPIP cycle ending after January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, based on the portion of the cycle completed as of January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 and assuming target performance, plus, in the event of termination due to death or disability, the fiscal 20152018 MIP award at target without proration. Proration for purposes of the LRPIP amount would have been determined based on the number of completed months ofin the cycle or, in the event of Ms. Meyrowitz’s retirement or voluntary termination, with 90 days’ notice,the number of completed years in the cycle.

 

(3)SeePotential AccelerationThe value of Unvestedcontinued vesting of stock awards included in this table assumes that applicable performance conditions are satisfied. In the event of termination due to death or disability, retirement, or termination without cause or constructive termination, the potential acceleration, settlement, or continued vesting of LRPIP-based stock awards held by our NEOs would be subject to proration, if applicable, based on full fiscal years completed during the performance period, except that Ms. Meyrowitz’s LRPIP-based stock awards would be proratedone-third if the triggering event occurs before the end of the first fiscal year of the performance period ortwo-thirds if the triggering event occurs before the end of the second fiscal year of the performance period. Equity Awards, above for additional detail about these amounts.awards granted before September 2015 vest in full upon a change of control of TJX and are included under “Change of Control” in this table. Equity awards granted in September 2015 or later do not include automatic full accelerated vesting upon a change of control of TJX. These awards would vest in full upon a change of control of TJX if not continued or assumed in the transaction or, if continued or assumed, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment following the change of control, and are included under “Change of Control followed by Qualifying Termination” in this table, except that stock awards are included under “Change of Control” in this table to the extent the applicable service conditions were satisfied and the award would have been settled in connection with a change of control on February 3, 2018.

 

(4)In the event of death on January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, the beneficiaries of our named executive officersNEOs would also have been entitled to the following amounts under our management- and executive-level life insurance programs: $520,000 for Mr. Herrman; $1,075,000$720,240 for Mr. MacMillan and $975,000 for each other named executive officer.NEO. Company-paid amounts for these programs are included and described above in the Summary Compensation Table under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2015.2018.

 

(5)For Ms. Meyrowitz, the amount represents the estimated value of any enhancement under our SERP in the case of a qualifying termination following a change of control. The enhancement value represents the difference between (a) the estimated amount payable to Ms. Meyrowitz under SERP using the post-change of control actuarial assumptions specified in her employment agreement representing early commencement of her unreduced benefit and (b) the estimated amounts payable to Ms. Meyrowitz under SERP using thepre-change of control actuarial assumptions specified in the plan and her employment agreement (which as of January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 would have produced higher lump sum benefit values than those shown in the Pension Benefits table above by $3,723,138)$1,096,023).

 

(6)In the case of a change of control (both with and without a termination)termination of employment) occurring on January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, we estimated the mandatory reductions to benefits that would apply in order to maximize the executive’s benefit afterchange-of-control excise and other taxes. We determined that no mandatory reduction to benefits would apply in the case of a change of control, without a qualifying termination, occurring on January 31, 2015 and that such reduction would only apply to Mr. Goldenberg’s benefits in the case of a change in control, with an accompanying termination, occurring on January 31, 2015. For purposes of this determination, we assumed that all equity awards would have been cashed out at closing in the amounts described above underPotential Accelerationin footnote 3 of Unvested Equity Awards;this table; that only a portion of the value of stock options, performance-based stock awards with performance periods ending on January 31, 2015,February 3, 2018, accumulated cash dividends with respect to such stock awards, and certain other payments, would have been treated as contingent upon a change of control; and that none of the payments would be exempt under a special rule for reasonable compensation or treated as contingent upon a change of control under a special presumption applicable to agreements entered into or amendments made during fiscal 2015.2018. Applying these assumptions we determined that the only case in which a mandatory reduction to benefits would have been required would have been a reduction to Mr. Goldenberg’s benefits in the case of a change of control with a qualifying termination occurring on February 3, 2018.

2018 Proxy Statement    57


LOGO

CEO PAY RATIO

At the end of fiscal 2018, we operated over 4,000 retail stores, including more than 1,000 stores outside the U.S., and employed approximately 249,000 Associates worldwide. More than 86% of these Associates worked in our retail stores. Our total number of Associates, which is subject to seasonal variations, includes full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees. This workforce supports the execution of our flexibleoff-price business model, including the timing and frequency of store deliveries and the management of a rapidly changing mix of store inventory, throughout our global business.

Our CEO’s annual total compensation for fiscal 2018 was $16,880,171 as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above. In accordance with SEC rules, the median of the annual total compensation of all employees (other than the CEO) was estimated to be $11,243 for fiscal 2018, which resulted in an estimated ratio of 1,501:1. The median employee for purposes of this estimate was a part-time hourly retail store Associate. To identify the median employee in accordance with these rules, we included all employees in our global operations as of the last day of fiscal 2018, including full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary employees, and estimated annual total compensation for all of these employees based on calendar 2017 payroll records in each jurisdiction, converting foreign currencies to U.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate for calendar 2017. As part of this process, we annualized earnings for employees, other than seasonal and temporary employees, who were hired during the fiscal year.

SEC rules allow companies to use a variety of methods and assumptions to estimate median employee compensation, and factors such as industry, geography, business model, and workforce composition will vary across companies. Accordingly, the information above may not be comparable to information reported by other companies.

58    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

OVERVIEW

For fiscal 2015,2018, ournon-employee directors were entitled to the following payments:

 

Annual retainer of $75,000$80,000 for eachnon-employee director

 

Additional annual retainer of $28,000 for the Audit Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $15,000 for each Audit Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

Additional annual retainer of $26,000 for the Chairman of the subcommittee of the Audit Committee

 

Additional annual retainer of $23,000 for the Executive Compensation Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Executive Compensation Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Corporate Governance Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Corporate Governance Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

 

Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Finance Committee ChairChairman

 

Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Finance Committee member (other than the Chair)Chairman)

 

Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director

 

Two annual deferred stock awards for eachnon-employee director, each representing shares of our common stock valued at $70,000$80,000

Employee directors do not receive separate compensation for their service as directors. Members of the Executive Committee do not receive committee-specific compensation. Directors are reimbursed for customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings. The deferred stock awards (and(including deferred dividends on thosedividend awards) are granted under ourthe SIP. One of the deferred stock awards vests immediately and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at the earlier of separation from service as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on a director’s continued service until the annual meeting next following the grant of the award (subject to possible earlier vesting in the event of a change of control if not continued or assumed in the transaction or if a qualifying termination of service as a director occurs following the change of control and prior to the scheduled vesting date), and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock upon vesting or, if an irrevocable advance election is made, at the same time as the first award. In the event that anon-employee director separates from service as a director prior to vesting in the second award, that award will beis forfeited.

Ournon-employee directors are eligible to defer their retainers and fees under the ESP (described above in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans) but are not eligible for matching credits. Amounts deferred by directors under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments. Participatingnon-employee directors may select a distribution date earlier than retirement from the Board, but no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. During fiscal 2015,2018, Mr. Bennett and Ms. ShireNemerov deferred amounts under the ESP. Prior to January 1, 2008, ournon-employee directors were eligible to defer their retainers and fees in our GDCP (described above in Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans), under which amounts deferred earn interest at a periodically adjusted market-based rate. Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) will be distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prioramounts) are scheduled to that date) will be paid onupon or after leaving the Board. Mr. Bennett and Ms. Shire currently participate inhave amounts previously deferred under the GDCP. We do not provide retirement, health or life insurance benefits to ournon-employee directors.

2018 Proxy Statement    59


LOGO

The following table provides information concerning compensation for ournon-employee directors for fiscal 2015. Compensation for2018. Information about Mr. Cammarata as an employeeHerrman’s and executive officer of TJX for fiscal 2015 is included below, although it is our policy that employee directors are not paid additional compensation for their service as directors. Ms. Meyrowitz’s compensation for fiscal 2018 is shown above in the Summary Compensation Tableprovided with that of the other named executive officers.

Directors Compensation for Fiscal 2015NEOs in the CD&A and in the accompanying tables above.

 

Name

 Fees Earned
or Paid
In Cash
  Stock
Awards(1)(2)
  Option
Awards(2)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
 Change in
Pension Value and

Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

Zein Abdalla

 $    83,000   $  143,058             $  226,058  

José B. Alvarez

  100,000    160,891              260,891  

Alan M. Bennett

  106,000    160,891              266,891  

Bernard Cammarata

  500,000(3)         $   306,040(4)   $ 41,929(5)   847,969  

David T. Ching

  98,000    154,268              252,268  

Michael F. Hines

  111,000    162,226              273,226  

Amy B. Lane

  108,000    159,932              267,932  

Dawn Lepore(6)

  29,281    1,712          10,915    41,908  

John F. O’Brien

  155,000    170,625              325,625  

Willow B. Shire

  103,000    170,733              273,733  

DIRECTORS COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2018

Name

 

 

Fees Earned or Paid In Cash

 

 

Stock Awards(1)(2)

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Zein Abdalla

 

 

 

$  96,000

 

 

 

$ 169,031

 

 

 

$

 

 

 265,031

 

 

 

 

 

José B. Alvarez

 

 

 

  105,000

 

 

 

   203,647

 

 

 

 

 

 

308,647

 

 

 

 

 

Alan M. Bennett

 

 

 

  111,000

 

 

 

   206,307

 

 

 

 

 

 

317,307

 

 

 

 

 

David T. Ching

 

 

 

  129,000

 

 

 

   189,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

318,793

 

 

 

 

 

Michael F. Hines

 

 

 

  116,000

 

 

 

   208,780

 

 

 

 

 

 

324,780

 

 

 

 

 

Amy B. Lane

 

 

 

  113,000

 

 

 

   200,284

 

 

 

 

 

 

313,284

 

 

 

 

 

Jackwyn L. Nemerov

 

 

 

    90,000

 

 

 

   160,602

 

 

 

 

 

 

250,602

 

 

 

 

 

John F. O’Brien

 

 

 

  150,000

 

 

 

   220,089

 

 

 

 

 

 

370,089

 

 

 

 

 

Willow B. Shire

 

 

 

  108,000

 

 

 

   223,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

331,269

 

 

 

 

(1)For non-employee directors, reflectsReflects the grant date fair value of annual deferred share awards totaling $140,000 and/or$160,000 and annual credits of additional deferred shares in the amount of dividends accrued on deferred shares.shares, determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718, disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures and valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date.

 

(2)The following table shows the number of shares subject to outstanding stock awards and option awards for ournon-employee directors as of January 31, 2015 (other than Ms. Meyrowitz, whose outstanding equity awards are shown with the named executive officers above):February 3, 2018:

 

Name

          Outstanding Stock Awards(a)                  Outstanding Option Awards(b)        

Zein Abdalla

    6,146  

José B. Alvarez

  37,118  

Alan M. Bennett

  37,118  

Bernard Cammarata

    

David T. Ching

  24,722  

Michael F. Hines

  39,330  

Amy B. Lane

  34,109  8,500

Dawn Lepore

    

John F. O’Brien

  51,829  

Willow B. Shire

  53,425  

NameOutstanding Stock Awards*

Zein Abdalla

9,486

José B. Alvarez

41,640

Alan M. Bennett

45,177

David T. Ching

28,770

Michael F. Hines

47,473

Amy B. Lane

39,049

Jackwyn L. Nemerov

3,224

John F. O’Brien

56,911

Willow B. Shire

59,865

 

 (a)*1,249Includes awards of 1,082 deferred shares for eachnon-employee director werethat are unvested as of the end of fiscal 20152018 and that are scheduled to vest on the day before the 20152018 Annual Meeting.

 

(b)All options were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the NYSE on the date of grant, have a ten-year term, vest after one year or upon a change of control, and remain exercisable for the lesser of the term of the option or up to five years after cessation of Board service. Upon death within the last year of such five-year period, options remain exercisable for one year following death or until the earlier term of the option. Stock option grants for non-employee directors were eliminated in June 2006.

60    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

 

(3)Represents Mr. Cammarata’s salary under his employment agreement earned in fiscal 2015.

(4)Represents the increase in the actuarial present value of Mr. Cammarata’s accumulated benefit obligations under our Retirement Plan using the same assumptions as used in the Pension Benefits table, above. Non-employee directors do not receive retirement benefits. We do not pay above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation.

(5)Consists of an automobile benefit of $35,904; a matching contribution under our 401(k) plan of $3,484; payment of $1,041 in lieu of participation in our management life insurance program and reimbursement for financial planning of $1,500.

(6)Ms. Lepore did not stand for reelection in June 2014. After her departure from the Board, she served as a consultant to the Company and received consulting fees, reported in the All Other Compensation column.

PROPOSAL 22: RATIFICATION OF AUDITOR

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS AS

TJX’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2019

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 30, 2016.February 2, 2019. PwC has been retained as the Company’sTJX’s independent registered public accounting firm since 1962. We are asking stockholdersshareholders to ratify PwC’s appointment. RepresentativesA representative of PwC willis expected to attend the Annual Meeting where theyand will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so andso. The representative will also be available to answer questions from the stockholders.shareholders. The members of the Audit Committee and Board believe that the continued retention of PwC to serve as the Company’scompany’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Companycompany and its stockholders.shareholders.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends athat you vote FOR Proposal 2, Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.2.

PROPOSAL 33:SAY-ON-PAY

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF TJX’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TheCompensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), compensation tables, and narrative discussion beginning on page 16p. 21 of this proxy statement describesdescribe our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs for fiscal 2015, including2018. This year it includes a discussion of the focused shareholder engagement effort on executive compensation during fiscal 2018, a discussion of changes made by our ECC to the executive compensation program for fiscal 2019 in response to that engagement effort, as well as an overview of our fiscal 2018 program design and details of the various elements of the program. It also provides details of our fiscal 2015 performance to provide context for the compensation.compensation described in the CD&A and in the tables that follow it.

The Board of Directors, as required pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, is asking stockholdersshareholders to cast anon-binding, advisory vote indicating their approval of that compensation by voting FOR the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to its named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.

RESOLVED    That the shareholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the company’s named executive officers (NEOs), as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), compensation tables, and narrative discussion.

As described in more detail in theCompensation Discussion CD&A, we believe a key component of our continued success is developing and Analysis,retaining talent that can execute the fundamentals of ouroff-price business model throughout our complex global operations and drive our long-term strategy. To support this strategy, our overall compensation philosophyprogram is intended to create a program that attracts, motivatesattract and rewardsretain top talent; motivate executives to achieve our executives while maintaining shareholder-friendlybusiness objectives; reward performance; emphasize variable, performance-based compensation; support succession planning and effective leadership transitions; and maintain pay practices that help align the interest of our Associates and shareholders. We have designed a program that seeks to:

attract top talent in the highly competitive retail environment,

maintain an extremely high talent level in our company and provide for succession broadly across our management team,

reward objective achievement of our short- and long-term financial objectives with plans based on core business goals, and

enhance shareholder value by directly aligning the interests of our Associates and stockholders.
shareholders.

The Board is asking stockholdersshareholders to support this proposal. We believe TJX’s performance demonstrates the effectiveness of our compensation program. We received a strong supporting vote in the past several years (more than 97% of votes cast) expressing support for our compensation policies and practices and believe our program continues to be effective. We continue to focus on pay for performance in our compensation program, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which we encourage you to review.review the CD&A, including the design changes to our fiscal 2019 program that respond to the shareholder feedback we received. Although the vote we are asking you to cast isnon-binding, the ECC and the Board value the views of our stockholders. As with past years, theshareholders. The Board and ECC will consider the outcome of this vote when determining future compensation arrangements for our named executive officers. Our Board of Directors currently intends to conduct an annual advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation each year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of our say-on-pay advisory votes is held, which will be no later than the annual meeting of stockholders in 2017.NEOs, as they have done every year.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends athat you vote FOR Proposal 3 to approve,

Advisory Approvalon an advisory basis, executive compensation.

2018 Proxy Statement    61


LOGO

PROPOSAL 4: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

REPORT ON COMPENSATION DISPARITIES BASED ON RACE, GENDER, OR ETHNICITY

We received the following proposal from Zevin Asset Management, LLC, 11 Beacon Street, Suite 1125, Boston, Massachusetts 02108, on behalf of David Fenton, a beneficial owner of 860 shares of our common stock.

In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. The shareholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

As explained below, your Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal.

Shareholder Proposal

Whereas: The median income for women working full time in the U.S. is reportedly approximately 80 percent of that of their male counterparts. According to Economic Policy Institute, average hourly wages for black men are 78 percent of those of similarly situated white men. Wages for black women are 66 percent of those of comparable white men and 88 percent of those received by white women.

Women hold just over one half of retail industry positions, but women are underrepresented in higher paying retail management positions and overrepresented in low paying front line jobs. According to Demos, “retail employers pay Black and Latino full-time retail salespersons just 75 percent of the wages of their white peers.”

Stubborn pay gaps have attracted attention from national media and policymakers. Regulatory risk exists as the Paycheck Fairness Act, pending in Congress, would aim to improve company-level transparency and strengthen penalties for equal pay violations. California, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York have passed strong equal pay legislation.

Proper attention to inclusion and equity promotes effective human capital management. According to McKinsey, companies in the top quartiles for gender and racial/ethnic diversity were more likely to have financial returns above the industry median (“Why diversity matters,” McKinsey, 2015). In a Catalyst report, racial and gender diversity were positively associated with more customers, increased sales revenue, and greater relative profits. (“Why Diversity Matters,” Catalyst, 2013).

Leading companies are addressing diversity and inclusion via pay equity. In 2014, Gap Inc released data showing wage parity between male and female workers. Amazon, Apple, Costco, Intel, and Starbucks have committed to report on gender pay gaps. Intel and Microsoft have begun publishing pay gap data covering gender and race.

TJX reports that people of color account for 56 percent of the Company’s U.S. workforce but only 32 percent of its managers. TJX has taken steps to promote diversity; however, there is no reporting on gender, race, or ethnic pay gaps.

Investors seek clarity on how TJX manages risks and opportunities related to pay equity.

Resolved: Shareholders request that TJX prepare a report (at reasonable cost, in a reasonable timeframe, and omitting proprietary and confidential information) on the Company’s policies and goals to identify and reduce inequities in compensation due to gender, race, or ethnicity within its workforce. Gender-, race-, or ethnicity -based inequities are defined as the difference, expressed as a percentage, between the earnings of each demographic group in comparable roles.

Supporting Statement: A report adequate for investors to assess strategy and performance would include: (1) an aggregated, anonymized chart ofEEO-1 data identifying employees according to gender and race in the major EEOC-defined job categories, listing numbers or percentages in each category; (2) the percentage pay gap between groups (using a similar chart or square matrix); (3) discussion of policies addressing any gaps and quantitative reduction targets; and (4) the methodology used to identify pay inequities, omitting proprietary information.

62    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL 4

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this Shareholder Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes this proposal because we have designed a compensation structure intended to pay our Associates competitively and equitably based on their skills, qualifications, roles, and abilities and because this proposal would not enhance our existing commitment to fostering a diverse and inclusive culture.

As a large, complex, and global business, we believe it is important to our success in the long-term that our workforce be inclusive and reflect the diversity of our customers and the communities we serve. We have broadnon-discrimination policies, and we strive for diversity at all levels of our organization. We continue to work on initiatives that further embed inclusion as one of our core values, as it impacts not only our ability to recruit and retain Associates, but also reflects our team-based culture. To that end, in addition to our existing learning and training initiatives on diversity and inclusion, we recently developed additional inclusion pilot programs that are currently underway. These include an online unconscious bias training and diversity and inclusion guides for Associates, managers, and human resources.

Women and people of color are an important part of our workplace diversity and represent an increasing percentage of our leadership team. We are proud to report that, around the world, women hold approximately 65% of our managerial positions, which we define as Assistant Store Manager and above, and approximately 51% of our leadership positions, which we define as Assistant Vice President and above. Averaged over the past three years, women earned 76% of all our promotions globally. In our more senior leadership positions, over the past three years, on average, women earned 51% of the promotions into Senior Vice President roles, 40% of the promotions into Vice President roles, and 58% of the promotions into Assistant Vice President roles. In the United States, approximately 56% of all our Associates and 32% of our Associates in managerial positions are members of racially or ethnically diverse groups.

We are proud of the recognition we have received for our diversity and inclusion efforts. In 2017, we received a score of 100 on the Corporate Equality Index of the U.S.-based Human Rights Campaign, and we were listed as a top 50 employer by Equal Opportunity magazine. As discussed in further detail in our annual corporate responsibility report, which is available on our website, tjx.com, in the Responsibility section, we provide and promote inclusion-related learning and training initiatives on diversity; sponsor several Associate Resource Groups organized for networking and career development, including Women Adding Value Everyday (WAVE) and The Multicultural Coalition; and partner with organizations, including the National Council of La Raza and the National Urban League, to supplement our internal training and recruitment initiatives, among other efforts.

We believe it is imperative that we focus on attracting and retaining the best talent at all levels and in all functions, and we strive to provide compensation that is both competitive in the market and equitable across our diverse workforce. We set objective pay targets by position and conduct general periodic compensation reviews to ensure that our compensation structure is working as intended. Furthermore, our incentive plans emphasize objective, performance-based pay and team-based execution of our business goals across the company.

We remain committed to our ongoing efforts to maintain fair pay practices, promote diversity, and to foster a diverse and inclusive culture where all Associates feel welcomed, valued for their contributions, and fully engaged with our business. Given our approach to our compensation program and our multipronged diversity and inclusion efforts, we believe the requested report would not offer shareholders meaningful additional information or further our diversity, inclusion, and pay equity goals.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 4.

2018 Proxy Statement    63


LOGO

PROPOSAL 5: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

AMENDING TJX’S CLAWBACK POLICY

We received the following proposal from Comerica Bank & Trust, National Association, 411 W. Lafayette Boulevard, MC 3464, Detroit, Michigan 48226, in its capacity as trustee of the Trowel Trades Large Cap Equity Index Fund, a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 of our common stock.

In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. The shareholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

As explained below, your Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal.

Shareholder Proposal

RESOLVED: Shareholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. (the “Company”), urge the Board of Directors’ Executive Compensation.Compensation Committee to amend the company’s compensation clawback policy, as applied to senior executives, to add that the Committee will review and determine whether to seek recoupment of incentive compensation paid, granted or awarded to a senior executive if, in the Committee’s judgment, certain conduct resulted in a violation of law or company policy and caused financial or reputational harm to the company, and if a senior executive either engaged in the conduct or failed in his or her responsibility to manage or monitor the conduct or risks, with the company to disclose to shareholders the circumstances of any recoupment or decision not to pursue recoupment in these situations.

“Recoupment” includes both recovery of compensation already paid and forfeiture, recapture, reduction or cancellation of amounts awarded or granted over which the company retains control. This policy should operate prospectively and be implemented so as not to violate any contract, compensation plan, law or regulation.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT: As long-term shareholders, we believe that compensation policies should promote sustainable value creation. We agree with former GE general counsel Ben Heineman Jr. that recoupment policies are “a powerful mechanism for holding senior leadership accountable to the fundamental mission of the corporation: proper risk taking balanced with proper risk management and the robust fusion of high performance with high integrity.” (http//: blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2010/08/13/making-sense-out-of-clawbacks/)

The company’s current clawback policy allows recoupment of certain incentive pay from a corporate officer if financial results are required to be restated due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement as a result of misconduct.

In our view, a recoupment policy that is limited to accounting and financial reporting noncompliance is too narrow.

We view recoupment as an important remedy for other kinds of conduct that may not lead to a restatement, but may nonetheless harm the company’s reputation and prospects, as well as its shareholders. We also believe a clawback policy should apply without regard to “materiality,” an element of the current policy.

The reason for a stronger policy is illustrated by the political and reputational risks TJX is incurring from its association with what a USA Today investigation calledmodem-day indentured serv[itude ]” in the Los Angeles and Long Beach port trucking industry. https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/news/rigged-forced-into-debt-worked-past-exhaustion-left-with-nothing/. The report documented how truck drivers, including those moving products destined for retail stores, are pressured to violate hours of service standards, pay for their own insurance, repairs, and fuel, and to sign“lease-to-own” agreements that do not allow them to keep the truck or recover their investment if they quit or are fired. The report prompted four U.S. Senators to write to TJX asking about its knowledge of labor violations in the port trucking industry and its plans to cut ties with offending companies.

64    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL 5

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this Shareholder Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes this proposal because the company has already adopted a customary recoupment policy and implemented compliance programs that adequately address senior executive conduct.

Our existing incentive compensation clawback policy, which is described above on p. 41, was adopted by our Board of Directors after a review of market practice and proposed SEC rules. The policy allows the Board (or a Committee of the Board) to seek recovery or forfeiture of incentive compensation from a current or former executive officer in the event of a material restatement of our financial results if the Board reasonably determines such officer engaged in knowing or intentional fraudulent or illegal conduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement. Under this policy, the Board will evaluate the circumstances and may seek recoupment of the portion of such executive officer’s incentive compensation that would not have been earned had performance been measured on the basis of the restated results. The policy covers incentive compensation received by or vested in the executive officer during the three-year period leading up to the determination that the restatement was required.

Under our clawback policy, the Board has reasonable discretion to act. This helps ensure that recoupment would be in the best interests of the company and our shareholders, while avoiding the vague and imprecise standards advocated by the proposal. Public disclosure of determinations under our clawback policy would be made in compliance with SEC rules and other applicable laws and otherwise at the Board’s discretion in order to balance investors’ interest in receiving the information with applicable legal, commercial, and privacy concerns.

Our clawback policy is not the sole basis for remedies the company may have in the event of executive misconduct and does not limit the company’s ability to pursue, under the terms of our executive agreements and compensation plans, the adjustment or recovery of compensation in other circumstances. Further, we have implemented compliance policies that extend throughout our organization, such as our Associate Global Code of Conduct, as well as those that apply specifically to our executive officers, such as our Code of Ethics for TJX Executives. These policies require our executive officers to commit themselves to, among other things, acting with honesty and integrity; proactively promoting ethical behavior; and providing constituents with information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely, and understandable. We believe that the reputational risks described in the proposal are adequately managed by our current practices. Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our enterprise risk management function, which includes oversight of matters that may present material risk to our reputation, among other things.

The Board believes that our current compensation structure strikes the right balance to motivate executive officers to drive long-term profitable and sustainable growth, while discouraging illegal or unethical conduct through our clawback policy and other means. Further, the proposal’s imprecise standards could undermine our ability to compete for and retain executive talent, in part because we do not believe it is consistent with prevalent peer practices. Accordingly, as we believe our current policy and practices are effective, we believe that the amendment requested by the proposal is unnecessary and would not add meaningful value to the policies and processes already in place.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5.

2018 Proxy Statement    65


LOGO

PROPOSAL 6: SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

SUPPLY CHAIN POLICY ON PRISON LABOR

We received the following proposal from NorthStar Asset Management, Inc. Funded Pension Plan, P.O. Box 301840, Boston, Massachusetts 02130, a beneficial owner of 819 shares of our common stock.

In accordance with SEC rules, we are reprinting the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. The shareholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

As explained below, your Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST the shareholder proposal.

Shareholder Proposal

WHEREAS:Financial and operational risks related to the sale of goods produced with prison labor, including reputational damage, litigation, and supply chain disruption, can adversely affect shareholder value;

Our company’s Vendor Code of Conduct appears to prohibit forced prison labor: “Our vendors must not use involuntary or forced labor, whether in the form of prison labor, indentured labor, bonded labor, labor acquired through slavery or human trafficking, or otherwise”;

However, prison labor in the United States and other countries where TJX goods are sourced can be both forced and voluntary. Although slavery and involuntary servitude were abolished by the 13th Amendment, an exception was made for “punishment for crime”;

Some U.S. prisoners are paid$0.23-$1.15 per hour, however in the U.S. and worldwide many inmates are often forced to work for no compensation, in unsafe or unhealthy conditions;

Companies enjoy low overhead costs when inmates make consumer products on their behalf, including furniture, clothing, food products, and packaging materials;

Watchdogs assert that prison labor is often deployed in an inhumane manner, failing to balance company cost savings with prisoner mistreatment. These issues can undermine a retailer’s reputation. In 2015, Whole Foods experienced significant backlash when customers learned that prisoner-made products were sold in stores;

Our Company has a factory auditing program which appears to only apply to factories manufacturing products that TJX designs, and it is unclear whether the Company also surveys forvoluntaryprison labor or verifies the absence of all forms of prison labor in the entire vendor supply chain;

Careful review of our supply chain for voluntary and involuntary prison labor would help ensure that TJX suppliers are consistent with Company policies and minimize risks to TJX’s reputation and shareholder value.

RESOLVED:Shareholders of TJX urge the Board of Directors to adopt a policy committing the Company to: a) Survey all suppliers to identify sources of prison labor in the Company’s supply chain; b) Develop and apply additional criteria or guidelines for suppliers regarding the use of prison labor; and c) Report to shareholders no later than June 30, 2019, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on TJX’s progress in implementing the policy.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:The Proponent recommends that the company’s progress report include:

Summary of results of the supplier survey, including actual and/or potential sources of prison labor identified, and in particular any use of:

a) Suppliers using prison labor with compulsory, uncompensated, or severely undercompensated work programs,

b) Suppliers using prison labor fromprivately-run prisons;

66    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

Summary of new criteria and guidelines for the use of prison labor;

Methodologies to be used to track, audit, and measure supplier performance;

Nature and extent of consultation with relevant stakeholders in connection with the policy development and implementation.

Examples for possible guidelines or criteria could include: consideration of a minimum wage and/or overtime pay for inmate laborers, safety/health conditions, supplier-providedjob-matching programs for inmates upon release.

STATEMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL 6

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this Shareholder Proposal.

The Board of Directors opposes this proposal because it believes the adoption of the requested policy and report is an inefficient use of company resources that would not result in useful information to shareholders.

We prohibit all of our vendors from using prison labor when manufacturing products that we sell in our stores. Our Vendor Code of Conduct, which embraces internationally recognized principles designed to protect the interests of the workers who manufacture products for sale in our stores, prohibits our vendors from using “voluntary or involuntary prison labor…or any forms of involuntary or forced labor.” The Vendor Code of Conduct applies to all of our vendors as well as all subcontractors and any other third parties our vendors may use in the production or distribution of goods offered for sale in our stores. It applies even if a vendor applies its own code of conduct, monitoring, or ethical sourcing guidelines.

A vendor’s violation of our Vendor Code of Conduct may result in corrective action, our cancellation of purchase order(s), and/or termination of our business relationship with the vendor. Moreover, there are several issues that we consider‘zero-tolerance’ issues, including the use of prison labor in the manufacturing of products for sale in our stores. Our policy is to terminate immediately our relationship with a factory where prison labor is found.

Our Vendor Code of Conduct has historically required that vendors not use prison labor in any form. Nevertheless, upon receipt of this proposal, we amended our Vendor Code of Conduct to make more explicit our position. We immediately posted the amended Vendor Code of Conduct to our publicly-available website and to our vendor intranet site, which centralizes our communications of our business standards and requirements to our vendors. We also updated our Global Social Compliance Manual, which is distributed to our vendors and buying agents. Our long-running social compliance trainings with our buying agents, vendors, and factory management that cover many topics, including our policy prohibiting the use of any prison labor, continue.

We believe the actions we have taken to prohibit the use of prison labor in the manufacture of products that we sell in our stores are sufficient and that the shareholder’s request that we survey each of our over 20,000 vendors around the globe regarding this practice would be costly, time-consuming, unnecessary, and impracticable in light of our existing policies, practices, and sourcing model. Accordingly, we do not believe that the requested policy and report is an effective or prudent use of corporate resources that would serve the best interest of our shareholders.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 6.

2018 Proxy Statement    67


LOGO

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides certain information as of January 31, 2015February 3, 2018 with respect to our equity compensation plans:

 

Plan Category  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights(a)
   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(b)
  Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column(a)) (c)
  

Number of securities to be

issued upon exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights(a)

 

 

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding

options, warrants

and rights(b)

 

 

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under

equity compensation

plans (excluding

securities reflected in

column(a))(c)

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

   30,586,031    $    34.91   40,393,448   

 

 

 

 

29,187,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$55.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,557,537

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   N/A        N/A   N/A       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

Total

 30,586,031  $    34.91 40,393,448   

 

 

 

 

29,187,510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$55.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

26,557,537

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

 

We use one equity compensation plan, the Stock Incentive Plan (or SIP). The number of securities available for issuance under the SIP was most recently approved by shareholders in 2013. Securities reported in column (a) include outstanding options and restricted stock unit awards as well as outstanding deferred stock awards where the underlying shares have not been issued. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) takes into account option awards but not the 1,557,703 shares subject to other awards.

(1)We use one equity compensation plan, the Stock Incentive Plan (or SIP), which was most recently approved by shareholders in 2013. Securities reported in column (a) include outstanding options as well as outstanding performance-based deferred stock awards and director deferred share awards where the underlying shares have not been issued. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) takes into account option awards but not the 507,802 shares subject to performance-based deferred stock awards and director deferred share awards.

For additional information concerning our equity compensation plan see Note IH to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for fiscal 2018.

68    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIESPRACTICES

The nominees

VOTING REQUIREMENTS

Quorum: A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting is required for a quorum for the meeting.

Election of directors: A nominee receiving a majority of the votes properly cast at the meeting for the nominee’s election (meaning he or she receives more votes cast ‘for’ than cast ‘against’) will be elected directors.director. As described above in Majority Voting in the Board Service at TJX section, we require any incumbent director standing for election to provide an irrevocable contingent resignation to be considered by the Board if the director receives a greater number of votes ‘against’ his or her election than votes ‘for’ such election. You may vote ‘for’ or ‘against’ each of the nominees for director in Proposal 1 or abstain from voting for one or more nominees for director.

Other proposals: All other proposals require the approval of thea majority of the votes properly cast.cast at the meeting (meaning the proposal is approved if there are more votes properly cast ‘for’ than cast ‘against’). You may vote ‘for’ or ‘against’ one or more of the other proposals. You may also abstain from voting on any of the proposals.

VOTING YOUR SHARES

If you owned TJX common stock at the close of business on April 9, 2018, our record date, you are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 626,927,947 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote. There are multiple ways to vote your shares.

If you are a shareholder of record (meaning you hold TJX shares registered in your name) please follow the instructions on the enclosed proxy card to indicate how you would like your shares voted. You may vote online or by telephone (using the toll-free telephone number provided) or sign and return the proxy card by mail.

If you are a street name holder, sometimes referred to as a beneficial holder, (meaning you own TJX shares through a bank, broker, or other third party), please refer to the voting instruction card or other enclosures provided by that third party with this proxy statement to see how and when to provide voting directions for your shares. (Online or telephone voting may be permitted.)

Both shareholders of record and street name holders may vote in person at the meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote in person at the meeting with proper documentation that demonstrates you were a TJX shareholder at the close of business on April 9, 2018 or hold a valid proxy for the annual meeting from such a shareholder. If you are a street name holder, you will need to bring proof of your beneficial ownership as of April 9, 2018, such as a brokerage account statement showing your ownership on that date or similar evidence of ownership.

If you vote your shares by mail, telephone, or Internet,online, your shares will be voted in accordance with your directions.

If you are a record holder and vote your proxy for the 2018 Annual Meeting by mail, telephone, or Internet,online, but do not indicate specific choices for some or all proposals as part of that process, your shares will be voted foras follows:

FOR the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1), for

FOR the ratification of the appointment of thePricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019 (Proposal 2), and for

FOR the advisory approval of ourTJX’s executive compensation (thesay-on-pay vote) (Proposal 3), and

AGAINST each of the shareholder proposals (Proposal 4 through Proposal 6).

The persons named as proxies will also be able to vote your shares at postponed or adjourned meetings. If any director nominee should become unavailable, your shares will be voted for another nominee selected by the Board or for only the remaining nominees.

2018 Proxy Statement    69


LOGO

However, if you are a street name holder, note that banks, brokers, and other third parties are not permitted to vote your shares on any matter other than the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered

public accounting firm (Proposal 2) without instruction from you. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or nomineeother third party and you do not instruct the bank, broker, or nomineeother third party on how to vote your shares with respect to the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1), or the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3),any of Proposals 3 through 6, or if you abstain or withhold authority to votefrom voting on any matter, your shares will not be counted as having been voted on that matter,matter. Your shares will therefore have no effect on the outcome of the vote, but will be counted as in attendance at the meeting for purposes of a quorum.

CHANGING OR REVOKING YOUR PROXY

If you are a shareholder of record, you may change or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by voting plan shares,later online or by telephone, returning a later-dated proxy card by mail, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of TJX at our corporate offices at:

Corporate Secretary

c/o Legal Department

The TJX Companies, Inc.

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

If you must provideare a street name holder, you should refer to the voting instruction card provided with this proxy statement or contact your broker, bank, or other third party holder of record for instructions on how to change or revoke your vote. You also should have a choice of methods to change or revoke your voting instructions bybefore the deadline described above in theIntroduction so that the plan trustee may vote your plan shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not timely provide your voting instructions, your plan shares will not be voted.meeting.

STOCKHOLDER

PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS FOR THE NEXT ANNUAL MEETING

PROPOSALS TO BE INCLUDED IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT

A stockholdershareholder who intends to present a proposal for business other than director nominations at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting pursuant to Rule14a-8 under the Exchange Act must submit the proposal in writing to us so that we receive it no later than December 26, 2015. 27, 2018 and must otherwise comply with SEC rules in order to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy materials for that meeting.

A stockholdershareholder who wishes to nominate a director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and who wishes the nomination to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting must notify us in writing no earlier than November 27, 2018 and no later than December 27, 2018. The notice must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by our by-laws. Our by-laws, which are available on our website, tjx.com, describe the requirements for nominating directors at the annual meeting.

70    The TJX Companies, Inc.


LOGO

PROPOSALS NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN NEXT YEAR’S PROXY STATEMENT

A shareholder who intends to present a proposal for business at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders but who does not wish the proposal to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting must provide written notice of the proposal to us no earlier than February 12, 20165, 2019 and no later than March 13, 2016.7, 2019. Notices must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by ourby-laws. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Our by-laws, which are available onrequirements of our website, www.tjx.com, describe the requirements for submitting proposals at the Annual Meeting.by-laws. A stockholdershareholder who wishes to nominate a director at the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders but who does not wish the nomination to be included in our proxy materials for that meeting must notify us in writing no earlier than February 12, 20165, 2019 and no later than March 13, 2016. The notice must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by our by-laws.7, 2019.

OTHER MATTERS

At the time of mailing of this proxy, we do not know of any other matter that may come before the Annual Meeting and do not intend to present any other matter. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by the proxies in accordance with their own judgment, including the authority to vote to adjourn the meeting.

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. We have retained Morrow & Co.,Sodali LLC to assist in soliciting proxies by mail, telephone, and personal interview for a fee of $11,500, plus expenses. Our officers and other Associates may also assist in soliciting proxies in those manners.

2018 Proxy Statement    71


LOGO

DIRECTIONS TO THE TJX ANNUAL MEETINGAPPENDIX A

TJX CORPORATE HEADQUARTERSDEFINITIONS

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, MA 01701

From Exit 13We define comparable store sales (comp sales) to be sales of stores that have been in operation for all or a portion of two consecutive fiscal years, or in other words, stores that are starting their third fiscal year of operation. We calculate comp sales on a 52-week basis by comparing the current and prior year weekly periods that are most closely aligned. Relocated stores and stores that have changed in size are generally classified in the same way as the original store, and we believe that the impact of these stores on the Massachusetts Turnpikeconsolidated comp percentage is immaterial. Sales excluded from comp sales consists of: new stores (stores that have not yet met the comp sales criteria); stores that are closed permanently or for an extended period of time; and sales from our e-commerce businesses, meaning Sierra Trading Post (including stores), tjmaxx.com and tkmaxx.com. We determine which stores are included in the comp sales calculation at the beginning of a fiscal year and the classification remains constant throughout that year unless a store is closed permanently or for an extended period during that fiscal year. Comp sales of our foreign segments are calculated by translating the current year’s comp sales of our foreign segments at the same exchange rates used in the prior year. This removes the effect of changes in currency exchange rates, which we believe is a more accurate measure of segment operating performance. The method for calculating comp sales varies across the retail industry, therefore our measure of comp sales may not be comparable to other retail companies.

AfterWe define customer traffic to be the tollbooth, bear leftnumber of transactions in stores included in the comp sales calculation.

The way we define these financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities.

NOTES ON CHARTS

Annual Sales Growth, p. 30. Peer group averages are based on sales reported for the comparable period to TJX’s fiscal year-end. TJX’s fiscal 2018 revenue is reported on a 53-week basis. Peer group data is on a reported basis and may include 52-week figures. Nike and Starbucks figures are based on the exit ramp acrosslast four quarters reported; Procter Gamble figures are excluded because it experienced a corporate event that resulted in restated financial statement. TJX’s adjusted growth for fiscal 2018 on a52-week basis is 6.3%, with an overpassestimated impact of approximately 170 basis points from the 53rd week.

Earnings Per Share, p. 30. For the EPS and onto RouteAdjusted EPS chart on p. 30, / Cochituate Road. Atsee below for reconciliations of TJX adjusted EPS to GAAP EPS.

RECONCILIATIONS

Earnings Per Share.Adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of TJX excludes from diluted EPS from continuing operations computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) the following positive and negative effects of items that affect comparability between periods. Several of the peer group members also report adjusted EPS, which were used in calculating the five-year adjusted EPS growth rate for our fiscal 2018 peer group. Peers might not calculate adjusted EPS in the same way we do. Adjusted EPS for our peers includes GAAP EPS for years in which no adjusted EPS was reported.

For TJX EPS:

Fiscal 2012 adjusted EPS of $1.99 excludes the negative impact of $0.06 per share from the A.J. Wright consolidation from GAAP EPS of $1.93.

Fiscal 2013 adjusted EPS of $2.47 excludes an estimated $0.08 per share benefit from the 53rd week from GAAP EPS of $2.55.

Fiscal 2014 adjusted EPS of $2.83 excludes an $0.11 per share tax benefit from GAAP EPS of $2.94.

Fiscal 2015 adjusted EPS of $3.16 excludes the negative impact of a second setquarter debt extinguishment charge of lights, turn left into The TJX Companies, Inc. facility.$0.01 per share on GAAP EPS of $3.15.

From Logan International Airport (FromFiscal 2017 adjusted EPS of $3.53 excludes the East)negative impact of $0.07 from a third quarter debt extinguishment charge and a pension settlement charge from GAAP EPS of $3.46.

Leaving the Airport, follow the signs for the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W). Follow the Massachusetts Turnpike West for approximately 20 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

From the West

Take Massachusetts Turnpike East (I-90E) to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

From the North

Take I-95 South to exit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike I-90). Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

From the South

Take I-95 North to exit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike). Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above forFrom Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

Parking

TJX offers free parking. Follow the parking lot directory signageFiscal 2018 adjusted EPS of $3.85 excludes $0.17 from benefits related to the visitor parking areas.2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, offset by charges from a special, discretionary bonus to eligible,non-bonus plan Associates; incremental contributions to TJX’s defined contribution retirement plans; and contributions to TJX’s charitable foundations; an estimated $0.11 benefit from the 53rd week; and a $0.10 impairment charge related to Sierra Trading Post from GAAP EPS of $4.04.

Building Entrance

Enter the building through the Northeast Entrance (facing the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90)).


LOGO

LOGO

Mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
 LOGO

        LOGO

Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies for record holders submitted online or by the Internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 11, 2015.5, 2018. See reverse for more information.

 

    LOGO

LOGO 

Vote Online

 Vote by Internet

• Go towww.envisionreports.com/TJX

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

 

• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories &and Canada on a touch tone telephone

 

• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Mark your votes with anX as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.x

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED ONLINEOR VIA TELEPHONE, PLEASE VOTE, DATE, AND SIGN ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS CARD,q

FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, AND DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

 

LOGO

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, PLEASE VOTE, DATE AND SIGN BELOW, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.   q

  A   Management Proposals —The Board recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees andFOR Proposals 2 and 3.

The Board recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees:

+

1.  Election of Directors: For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  For Against Abstain  +

 

     01 - Zein Abdalla

 ¨ ¨ ¨ 02 - José B. Alvarez¨¨¨03 - Alan M. Bennett ¨ ¨ ¨ 
     0403 - David T. Ching ¨ ¨ ¨
     04 - Ernie Herrman 05 - Michael F. Hines ¨ ¨ ¨ 06 - Amy B. Lane ¨ ¨ ¨  
     07 - Carol Meyrowitz ¨ ¨ ¨ 08 - Jackwyn L. Nemerov09 - John F. O’Brien ¨ ¨ ¨09 - Willow B. Shire¨¨¨  
     10 - William H. SwansonWillow B. Shire ¨ ¨ ¨          

The Board recommends a voteFOR Proposals 2 and 3:

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain

  For Against Abstain          For Against Abstain
2.  Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers as TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019     3.  Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the say-on-pay vote)   

2. Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016.

¨¨¨

3. Say-on-Pay: Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation.

¨¨¨

 

  B   Non-Voting ItemsShareholder Proposals 

Change of Address — Please print new address below.

    Comments— Please print your comments below.

 The Board recommends a voteAGAINST Proposals 4, 5, and 6:

  For Against Abstain          For Against Abstain
4.  Shareholder proposal for a report on compensation disparities based on race, gender, or ethnicity     5.  Shareholder proposal for amending TJX’s clawback policy   
6.  Shareholder proposal for a supply chain policy on prison labor         

LOGO


The TJX Companies, Inc.

2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Tuesday, June 5, 2018, 9:00 a.m. (local time)

Hilton Garden Inn Montreal Centre-Ville

380 Sherbrooke St. West,

Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0B1, Canada

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement online at: www.envisionreports.com/TJX
Your vote is important. Please vote online, by telephone, or by mail.

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED ONLINEOR VIA TELEPHONE, PLEASE VOTE, DATE, AND SIGN BELOW,q

FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, AND DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.

– – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –  – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Proxy — THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

+

2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting - June 5, 2018

Ernie Herrman, Scott Goldenberg, and Alicia C. Kelly, or any of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized as Proxies to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned with respect to all of the matters indicated on the reverse side of this card and any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. to be held at the Hilton Garden Inn Montreal Centre-Ville, 380 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0B1, Canada on Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. (local time) and at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the Proxies subject to the directions indicated by the shareholder on the reverse side of this card. If no directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR each nominee; FOR Proposals 2 and 3; and AGAINST Proposals 4, 5, and 6. In their discretion, the Proxies are hereby authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any postponement or adjournment thereof.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)

 C  

 

Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

Below

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the books of the Company. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title to indicate the capacity in which you are signing.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

 

Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.

 

Signature 2 — Please keep     signature within the box.

     /      /       

LOGO


The TJX Companies, Inc.

2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Thursday, June 11, 2015, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time

TJX Corporate Headquarters

770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

 

 D  

Non-Voting Items

Change of Address— Please print new address below.Comments— Please print your comments below.

IF VOTING BY MAIL, PLEASE COMPLETE BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

 

+

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at:www.envisionreports.com/TJX

Your vote is important. Please vote by internet, by telephone or by mail.

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.  q

LOGO

Proxy — THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting - June 11, 2015

Carol Meyrowitz, Scott Goldenberg and Mary B. Reynolds, or any of them, each with the full power of substitution, are hereby authorized as Proxies to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned with respect to all of the matters indicated on the reverse side of this card and any other matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. to be held at TJX Corporate Headquarters, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts on Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. (local time), or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Shares represented by this proxy will be voted by the Proxies subject to the directions indicated by the stockholder on the reverse side of this card. If no directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR each nominee and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. In their discretion, the Proxies are hereby authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

However, if you are voting shares held in the TJX stock fund available through The TJX Companies, Inc. General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan, our U.S. 401(k) plan, or The TJX Companies, Inc. General Savings/Profit Sharing Plan (P.R.), our Puerto Rico savings plan, (collectively, “plan shares”), your plan shares will be voted by the plan trustee in accordance with your instructions. Your voting instructions must be received by11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, Sunday, June 7, 2015to allow time for tabulation and voting.Please note that if your instructions are not received by this time, your plan shares will not be voted.

(Items to be voted appear on reverse side.)